Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

С любовью, Аня Иванова

@ann_is_hot

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

771subscribers

+14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002019745359
TypeChannel
Username@ann_is_hot
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ann_is_hot

Growth

7577717646 August 2026 — 757 subscribers6 August 2026 — 757 subscribers6 August 2026 — 766 subscribers15 August 2026 — 771 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 9 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 755–773 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 00:25771+5
6 Aug 2026, 19:37766+9
6 Aug 2026, 15:52757no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:01757first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
80.2%
avg views ÷ 771 subscribers
Avg views / post
618
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (26 June 20264 August 2026)
Views total6,181
Reactions total487
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

814 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
49761.1%
🔥13116.1%
👍10312.7%
❤‍🔥455.53%
😢131.60%
🙏70.86%
💯60.737%
🤪60.737%
😁40.491%
🤔10.123%
🥰10.123%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 814reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ann_is_hot. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC674 views90 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Есть знакомства, которые меняют жизнь. Таким знакомством для меня стала встреча с Олей Соколовой. Не помню уже, как и где, я наткнулась на рекламу Радостного курса в начале 2025 года. А я была тогда не просто на дне эмоционально и физически. Это было как в том анекдоте, когда снизу постучали. Я выгорела до такой степени, что банальное ОРВИ дало осложнения, и я не слышала одним ухом месяца полтора - врачи даже став

69❤‍🔥13🔥8

31 Jul 2026, 06:00 UTC≈1,310 views39 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Я училась в Университете Печати на факультете книжного дела и рекламы. И в начале студенчества подрабатывала в типографиях. А потом повысила сама себя и пошла работать продавцом-консультантом в книжный магазин “Москва”. До сих пор сердечко ёкает, когда прохожу мимо. Легендарный магазин, место книжной силы. Работая там, я регулярно встречала известных людей. Часто захаживал Никас Сафронов, который, по слухам, жил в

28👍6🔥5

28 Jul 2026, 18:08 UTC≈1,030 views32 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ничего не могу с собой поделать - люблю научные доказательства 🤓 Поэтому вот вам обещанные исследования об эффективности фрирайтинга по мотивам вчерашнего поста. Психолог Джеймс Пеннебейкер ввёл экспрессивное письмо как метод психотерапии ещё в 80-х. Проводилось несколько исследований с тех пор, и все они показали: - снижение тревожности и депрессии, - изменения самооценки, - снижение агрессии. Механизм примерно т

15🔥11👍6

27 Jul 2026, 08:53 UTC786 views60 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Новая практика, которую я попробовала в этом году, и теперь это моя база - фрирайтинг. Впервые я заинтересовалась этой темой, когда одна девушка сказала: фрирайтинг разделил жизнь на до и после (Манэ, привет!) А потом я оказалась в одном онлайн-кружке (Марина, привет!), где мы сообща читаем Джулию Кэмерон. Кэмерон считается главным популяризатором фрирайтинга. Или, как она его называет, “утренних страниц”. Правила

38🔥15👍6❤‍🔥1

26 Jul 2026, 10:26 UTC517 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026

В эфире забытая рубрика #контентнавыходные. Наверно, многие уже посмотрели интервью Дудя с Анной Юдинцевой. Но если еще нет - посмотрите обязательно. Девочка из Нижнего Новгорода, которая сейчас работает в США в обсерватории Ligo. Здесь в 2015 году была доказана теория Эйнштейна. А чуваки, которые руководили проектом, получили Нобелевку. Тезисно, что меня впечатлило: - То, как Аня говорит про космос. Как уже в 15

13🔥7👍2

24 Jul 2026, 07:27 UTC472 views36 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Я закрыла для себя инстаграм в 2022. Подумала, что блокировка - отличный способ борьбы с инста-зависимостью. И несколько лет не заходила туда вообще. А сейчас, с учетом того, что у меня теперь Громче, понимаю, что без инстаграма никак. Люблю телеграм всей душой. И правда считаю, что это социальная сеть здорового человека. Здесь ты решаешь, что хочешь читать и смотреть, а не алгоритмы Большого Брата, пытающиеся выж

21🔥10👍5

22 Jul 2026, 17:31 UTC443 views51 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Продолжаем про голоса в голове (про голоса бывших боссов тут) И прежде, чем я перейду к сути, долгая предыстория. У моей мамы была амбиция, что я обязательно должна выучиться в музыкальной школе. Я пошла туда в 7 лет и отмотала все 7 лет обучения. У меня не было особых музыкальных способностей. Да, мне, как и многим девочкам, хотелось научиться играть на пианино. Но! Играть мне хотелось какую-нибудь попсу, которая

29🔥16👍6

21 Jul 2026, 07:18 UTC368 views71 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Полтора года, как я ушла из найма. 8 месяцев Громче. А у меня до сих пор иногда в голове звучит хор всех моих бывших руководителей: “Ну что за херней Иванова занимается?! Что она, не может найти себе нормальную работу???” Прям каждого в лицо представляю с его/ее фирменной интонацией 😂 Поделилась этим как-то с одной мудрой женщиной. А она мне: а вдруг они все тебе просто ЗАВИДУЮТ! Че как думаете? 👍 завидуют 🤪 так

👍5312🤪6

15 Jul 2026, 05:05 UTC469 views38 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Хроники бездетного лета. Оно закончилось 😭. Рома вернулся, у нас были грандиозные планы на время вдвоем, но позавчера бабушка сообщила, что дети завшивели 😳. Егора даже остригли, и вот я мчу на поезде, чтобы вычесывать двух рапунцелей. Немного в шоке, что зараза, которую я высокомерно считала уделом маргиналов, коснулась и моих чистеньких деток 🤪. Ну это я утрирую, конечно. Знаю, что любое скопление любых детей м

27😢6👍5

9 Jul 2026, 09:55 UTC535 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Субъективное наблюдение. Людей, которые принципиально не ставят макс, и людей, которые перестали пользоваться телегой, потому что не хотят/не научились пользоваться VPN, - примерно равное количество. Сужу по своим хористкам и людям, которые к нам записываются на пробное (добавили в анкете пункт "удобный мессенджер") При этом первые не сдаются (по всей видимости, у них нет детей, которые учатся в гос школах 🤪). Но

16😢7😁4💯3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ann_is_hot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 154,249 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“С любовью, Аня Иванова” (@ann_is_hot), 771 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ann_is_hot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.