Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for انجمن ایران‌بان

Channel

انجمن ایران‌بان

@anjoman_iranban

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

735subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001306777051
TypeChannel
Username@anjoman_iranban
Created9 August 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/anjoman_iranban

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “انجمن ایران بان — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

7357457406 August 2026 — 745 subscribers6 August 2026 — 745 subscribers14 August 2026 — 744 subscribers21 August 2026 — 741 subscribers27 August 2026 — 739 subscribers5 September 2026 — 735 subscribers6 August 20265 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 30 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 734–747 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 01:59735-4
27 Aug 2026, 08:05739-2
21 Aug 2026, 06:15741-3
14 Aug 2026, 22:34744-1
6 Aug 2026, 16:05745no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:59745first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 30 November 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

319 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍17554.9%
😁7322.9%
👎226.90%
👏216.58%
🔥175.33%
61.88%
👌51.57%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 319 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 30 November 2023 to 23 December 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Dec 2023, 12:58 UTC≈5,350 views54 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

بله آتقی شوهر خاله نرگس رو می‌بینید که اینجوری جلوی شاه نروژ دولا شده!! همینا نگرانن مبادا ایران پادشاهی بشه و این چیزای ارباب رعیتی باب شه @anjoman_iranban

👍48👎3👌1🔥1😁1

22 Dec 2023, 10:13 UTC≈6,910 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

برای دومین بار در عرض کمتر از یک سال روس ها حقانیت حاکمیت ایران بر جزایر سه گانه را زیر سوال بردند. جزایری که شاه فقید آن ها را پس از یک و نیم قرن استعمار انگلیسی دوباره به ایران برگرداند و تحت حاکمیت ایران درآمدند. از نوچه های امت گرا و تهران نشین روس ها انتظار واکنش ویژه ای نداریم اما سکنه برج های دوبی و سکنه کاخ کرملین بدانند: شب دراز است و قلندر بیدار @anjoman_iranban

🔥15👌42👍1

20 Dec 2023, 05:42 UTC≈3,510 views29 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

اعتراف غیر مستقیم ولایتمدار ها به محبوبیت شاهان پهلوی در بین جوانان و شکست پروپاگاندای چهل ساله به گونه ای که از شدت عصبانیت آن را ناشی از بیسوادی و آگاهی نداشتن آنان می داند. اما بحث این حرف ها نیست، بیشینه نسل جوان و تازه نفس ایرانی برای گفتمان‌های رایج خلافت علوی اهمیتی قائل نیست تفاوت ندارد که گفتمان از رده ی مصباح یزدی و جلیلی و رییسی و احمدی نژاد باشد یا رفسنجانی و خاتمی و موسوی و روحانی آب را همان جا که می س

👍24😁31👎1

15 Dec 2023, 14:43 UTC≈3,220 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

شاید یادتون نیاد ولی موضوع چنگ زدن به سلبریتی هایی که گاها بدنام هم هستند و روی آوردن به افرادی که از نظر این ها هیز و هرزه اند بار نخست این جماعت نبوده این افراد سال 1396 تتلوی معلوم الحال رو معیار تشخیص حق از باطل می دونستند :) @anjoman_iranban

👍153

15 Dec 2023, 09:54 UTC≈4,290 views45 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

وقتی عمو استالین خودش لو میده ولی پان مقاومت می‌کنه @anjoman_iranban

😁33👎12

12 Dec 2023, 03:17 UTC≈1,210 views39 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

توئیت شاهزاده رضا پهلوی در بزرگداشت حماسه ملی ۲۱ آذر روز نجات آذربایجان از چنگال اهریمن @anjoman_iranban

👍33👎3😁3

11 Dec 2023, 18:23 UTC≈1,500 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

طرف تمام زور خود را میزند که در ایران پادشاهی برپا نشود و تاریخ ایران را کوفتی خوانده و پرچم ایران را تمسخر می‌کند، اما به نروژ می‌رود و مجیز شاه نروژ را می‌گوید @anjoman_iranban

👍21😁1

10 Dec 2023, 04:45 UTC≈3,230 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#سواد_رسانه_ای این اکانت پر مخاطب طرفدار ج ا مدعی شده که نیرو های حماس پوتین پوش بودند و این ها چون دمپایی دارند مردم عادی اند ( نگاره 1 ) در حالی که همین فرد در روز آغاز درگیری یهود و عرب غیر مستقیم گروه های فلسطینی را دمپایی پوش خوانده بود ( نگاره 2 ) در نگاره 3 و 4 هم پیداست که دمپایی و صندل به جای پوتین پای نیرو های فلسطینی است پی نوشت : راست گفتند کسی که دروغ می گوید کم حافظه است :) @anjoman_iranban

😁11👍3👎2

9 Dec 2023, 04:45 UTC≈2,100 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

حکومت زحمت‌کشان و یوتوپیای چپ ها به روایت چه‌ناگوارا @anjoman_iranban

👏21👎1

2 Dec 2023, 13:48 UTC≈2,030 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

نمی توان از کسانی که از میا خلیفه هم مایه می گذارند توقع داشت که به سمت انجام این کار با هنرمندان و سلبریتی های مشهور نروند حتی اگر مجبور شوند به فیک نیوز های تیک تاک چنگ بزنند ( نگاره چپ ) آن هم سلبریتی ای که چند ماه پیش اعلام شده بود قرار است در اسراییل کنسرت داشته باشد ( نگاره راست ) اما باید گفت که پرچم مورد استناد پرچم مکزیک است ( نک نخست - نک دوم ) و اگر هم این سلبریتی به راستی چنین کاری کرده بود هما

👍23

30 Nov 2023, 10:50 UTC≈1,140 views29 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

خب دلیل فحاشی های توکا نیستانی مشخص شد 😁😁 @anjoman_iranban

😁21👍7🔥1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @anjoman_iranban. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“انجمن ایران‌بان” (@anjoman_iranban), 735 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anjoman_iranban.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.