بله آتقی شوهر خاله نرگس رو میبینید که اینجوری جلوی شاه نروژ دولا شده!! همینا نگرانن مبادا ایران پادشاهی بشه و این چیزای ارباب رعیتی باب شه @anjoman_iranban
👍48👎3👌1🔥1😁1

Channel
@anjoman_iranban
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
735subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001306777051 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @anjoman_iranban |
| Created | 9 August 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/anjoman_iranban |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Recorded in 2019 as “انجمن ایران بان” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 01:59 | 735 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 739 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 741 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 744 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 745 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:59 | 745 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 30 November 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
319 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 175 | 54.9% | |
| 😁 | 73 | 22.9% | |
| 👎 | 22 | 6.90% | |
| 👏 | 21 | 6.58% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 5.33% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 1.88% | |
| 👌 | 5 | 1.57% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 319 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 30 November 2023 to 23 December 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
بله آتقی شوهر خاله نرگس رو میبینید که اینجوری جلوی شاه نروژ دولا شده!! همینا نگرانن مبادا ایران پادشاهی بشه و این چیزای ارباب رعیتی باب شه @anjoman_iranban
👍48👎3👌1🔥1😁1
برای دومین بار در عرض کمتر از یک سال روس ها حقانیت حاکمیت ایران بر جزایر سه گانه را زیر سوال بردند. جزایری که شاه فقید آن ها را پس از یک و نیم قرن استعمار انگلیسی دوباره به ایران برگرداند و تحت حاکمیت ایران درآمدند. از نوچه های امت گرا و تهران نشین روس ها انتظار واکنش ویژه ای نداریم اما سکنه برج های دوبی و سکنه کاخ کرملین بدانند: شب دراز است و قلندر بیدار @anjoman_iranban
🔥15👌4❤2👍1
اعتراف غیر مستقیم ولایتمدار ها به محبوبیت شاهان پهلوی در بین جوانان و شکست پروپاگاندای چهل ساله به گونه ای که از شدت عصبانیت آن را ناشی از بیسوادی و آگاهی نداشتن آنان می داند. اما بحث این حرف ها نیست، بیشینه نسل جوان و تازه نفس ایرانی برای گفتمانهای رایج خلافت علوی اهمیتی قائل نیست تفاوت ندارد که گفتمان از رده ی مصباح یزدی و جلیلی و رییسی و احمدی نژاد باشد یا رفسنجانی و خاتمی و موسوی و روحانی آب را همان جا که می س…
👍24😁3❤1👎1
شاید یادتون نیاد ولی موضوع چنگ زدن به سلبریتی هایی که گاها بدنام هم هستند و روی آوردن به افرادی که از نظر این ها هیز و هرزه اند بار نخست این جماعت نبوده این افراد سال 1396 تتلوی معلوم الحال رو معیار تشخیص حق از باطل می دونستند :) @anjoman_iranban
👍15❤3
وقتی عمو استالین خودش لو میده ولی پان مقاومت میکنه @anjoman_iranban
😁33👎12
توئیت شاهزاده رضا پهلوی در بزرگداشت حماسه ملی ۲۱ آذر روز نجات آذربایجان از چنگال اهریمن @anjoman_iranban
👍33👎3😁3
طرف تمام زور خود را میزند که در ایران پادشاهی برپا نشود و تاریخ ایران را کوفتی خوانده و پرچم ایران را تمسخر میکند، اما به نروژ میرود و مجیز شاه نروژ را میگوید @anjoman_iranban
👍21😁1
#سواد_رسانه_ای این اکانت پر مخاطب طرفدار ج ا مدعی شده که نیرو های حماس پوتین پوش بودند و این ها چون دمپایی دارند مردم عادی اند ( نگاره 1 ) در حالی که همین فرد در روز آغاز درگیری یهود و عرب غیر مستقیم گروه های فلسطینی را دمپایی پوش خوانده بود ( نگاره 2 ) در نگاره 3 و 4 هم پیداست که دمپایی و صندل به جای پوتین پای نیرو های فلسطینی است پی نوشت : راست گفتند کسی که دروغ می گوید کم حافظه است :) @anjoman_iranban
😁11👍3👎2
حکومت زحمتکشان و یوتوپیای چپ ها به روایت چهناگوارا @anjoman_iranban
👏21👎1
نمی توان از کسانی که از میا خلیفه هم مایه می گذارند توقع داشت که به سمت انجام این کار با هنرمندان و سلبریتی های مشهور نروند حتی اگر مجبور شوند به فیک نیوز های تیک تاک چنگ بزنند ( نگاره چپ ) آن هم سلبریتی ای که چند ماه پیش اعلام شده بود قرار است در اسراییل کنسرت داشته باشد ( نگاره راست ) اما باید گفت که پرچم مورد استناد پرچم مکزیک است ( نک نخست - نک دوم ) و اگر هم این سلبریتی به راستی چنین کاری کرده بود هما…
👍23
خب دلیل فحاشی های توکا نیستانی مشخص شد 😁😁 @anjoman_iranban
😁21👍7🔥1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @anjoman_iranban. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“انجمن ایرانبان” (@anjoman_iranban), 735 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anjoman_iranban.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.