ANIME 4DAY pinned «حسابي على الانستا»

Channel
ANIME 4DAY
@anime4day0
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
184,035subscribers
-10,486 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001882258853 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @anime4day0 |
| Description | صفحتنا على الفيسبوك : https://www.facebook.com/anime4day0 حسابنا على الانستقرام : https://www.instagram.com/anime.4day1/ |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 66 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/anime4day0 |
Topic
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 11:59 | 184,035 | -331 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 07:39 | 184,366 | -332 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 16:40 | 184,698 | -385 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:10 | 185,083 | -122 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 05:17 | 185,205 | -124 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 04:51 | 185,329 | -121 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 05:00 | 185,450 | -88 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 03:38 | 185,538 | -101 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 01:57 | 185,639 | -125 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 02:30 | 185,764 | -99 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 05:27 | 185,863 | -131 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 07:28 | 185,994 | -146 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 04:00 | 186,140 | -118 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:46 | 186,258 | -122 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 22:09 | 186,380 | -85 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 23:41 | 186,465 | -102 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 00:07 | 186,567 | -135 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 01:36 | 186,702 | -143 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 00:30 | 186,845 | -135 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 02:16 | 186,980 | first reading |
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 8 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 203 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.4%
- avg views ÷ 184,035 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 21,000
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.778%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (8 January 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 83,900 |
| Reactions total | 653 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Nov 2026, 14:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 188
- Videos
- 186
- Links
- 123
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 3h 17m
- Average length
- 17m 59s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
19,087 reactions across 22 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8,024 | 42.0% | |
| 🔥 | 6,443 | 33.8% | |
| 🤯 | 716 | 3.75% | |
| 😢 | 519 | 2.72% | |
| ❤🔥 | 432 | 2.26% | |
| 👍 | 420 | 2.20% | |
| 🥰 | 373 | 1.95% | |
| 😭 | 353 | 1.85% | |
| 🫡 | 253 | 1.33% | |
| 💔 | 250 | 1.31% | |
| 😱 | 207 | 1.08% | |
| ⚡ | 195 | 1.02% | |
| 👏 | 158 | 0.828% | |
| 🕊 | 140 | 0.733% | |
| 👀 | 107 | 0.561% | |
| 🎉 | 74 | 0.388% | |
| 🙏 | 69 | 0.362% | |
| 🏆 | 54 | 0.283% | |
| ✍ | 48 | 0.251% | |
| 🆒 | 47 | 0.246% | |
| 12 further kinds | 205 | 1.07% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19,087 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 8 January 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
حسابي على الانستا
❤29❤🔥7👏6👍4🥰3👨💻1
https://www.instagram.com/p/DfatpwtFyu8/?dlrf=MTBycHBxb3Q0eGVxNA==
🥰16❤9👀4🎉2😭1
ما كانت صدفة.
❤25🥰6🤯3😭1
وفاة مؤدي صوت شخصية غريشا ييغر والد ايرين من انمي هجوم العمالقة إثر ازمة قلبيه والذي اشتهر بأداء هذا المشهد الخالد 💔
😢335❤78😭33👍25💔20😱19🔥7👌6
ANIME 4DAY pinned a photo
نتمنى الاشتراك وتفعيل التنبيهات يا اقوى جمهور عربي افتخر بكم امام الجميع ❤️❤️🔗
❤345🔥38🥰26👍25🤯25👏10🕊8😱7
هذا القرار كان متأخر جداً للأسف ولكن الان اصبح لدينا قناة على اليوتيوب ونتمنى دعمكم … رابـ🔗ـط : http://www.youtube.com/@ANIME4DAYofficial❤️✋🏻
❤452🥰37👍34😱22🏆19🎉13😢12👀10
مشهد تدخل قوات الدعم السريع على احدى القرى 💔 من الانمي السوداني "تحت الرماد" (مشهد تشويقي) #السودان #انمي #اوتاكو #ANIME4DAY
😭318❤151💔119😢84🔥22😱13👏11✍10
بعد نجاح الصفحة ووصلها لأكثر من مليون متابع قررنا التوقف عن المحتوى الذي كنا ننشره على مدار هذه السنوات … قررنا ايضاً ان نبدأ بمحتوى افضل وله معنى وفكرة ويكون بوابة جديدة لكل محبي الانمي وهو ان نصنع وننتج فديوهات مشابهة للانمي الياباني بقصص عربية واقعية حدث بدولنا العربية … والبداية ستكون مع الانمي السوداني "تحت الرماد" وهو اول عمل ننتجه ونعمل عليه حالياً ونضع كل جهودنا فيه … وسنقوم بانتاج اعمال اخرى عن الجزائر وم…
❤341🔥40😢25👍18🥰10💔9👌8👏6
ANIME 4DAY pinned a photo
اتمنى منكم الدخول للصفحة ومتابعتها فهي صفحتي الاخرى والذي سوف يصدر عليها اول انمي عربي من انتاج ANIME 4DAY وتتحدث قصته عن احداث واقعية وقعت في ارض السودان الحبيبة رابط الصفحة : https://www.facebook.com/ANIME4DAYPLUS
❤336🔥34🫡25🤯22👍15💔10🤩4🥰3
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @anime4day0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@Animetoontv123 · 176,424#1
@E7teyaag1 · 2,437#2
@popprofx4admin · 4,695#3
@Horse4life · 4,084#4
@ZG_9P · 20,890#5
@shemas12 · 2,454#6
@zimabadk · 10,291#7
@drzeetelegram · 21,879#8
@anasss06 · 392#9
@ealaakhutaaalsalafnasir · 2,186#10
@yh_hi · 1,651#11
@ABAF6 · 648#12
@v_x_z1 · 615#13
@giathrefaie · 934#14
@As91om · 778#15
@bellieeilish · 1,725#16
@MedicalCollegeExams · 7,381#17
@RecipesPro · 698#18
@MHMADeibre · 1,144#19
@essoufia · 608#20
@Faith_facts · 3,317#21
@animewallpaperss · 4,250#22
@Eduyemen · 7,964#23
@TurkishlanguageSudan · 3,031#24
@kmtcor · 458#25
@smertnik1603 · 89#26
@WritersCaf · 1,096#27
@MDNNSY · 1,322#28
@AXYXV · 2,341#29
@hudalolohi67 · 374#30
@PH54MU · 1,439#31
@UUOOOOOOUO · 11,441#32
@l63_6 · 1,624#33
@PH55MU · 1,097#34
@first_209 · 1,221#35
@slamaaam · 3,183#36
@alwatanyaa · 2,523#37
@Cars_Clips · 2,933#38
@drmostafamohamed · 990#39
@feel_55 · 5,795#40
@F_K_S_B · 18,780#41
@aisru · 1,561#42
@faculty_of_pharmacy_students · 4,334#43
@sh7_97 · 2,166#44
@marketmaker218 · 21,200 (as read 24 September 2026)#45
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ZG_9P · 20,890
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 24 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ANIME 4DAY” (@anime4day0), 184,035 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anime4day0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.