Channel
@animalhosnolove
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
237subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003875781166 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @animalhosnolove |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 24 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/animalhosnolove |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 14:39 | 237 | -11 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 07:22 | 248 | -7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:33 | 255 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 259 | -7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 266 | +7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:27 | 259 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:31 | 256 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
73 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 32 | 43.8% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 9.59% | |
| 🤡 | 7 | 9.59% | |
| 🤝 | 6 | 8.22% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 6.85% | |
| 🐳 | 4 | 5.48% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 5.48% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 4.11% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 2.74% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 2.74% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 1.37% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
. 😻🥹🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 ╭──────༺♡༻──────╮ 🥹 🥹🥹 . 🥹 🥹 — я люблю джᥱст𝑒𝑝долл, но нигде не могу контент по ним ! — хочу поделиться своим артом, который я нарисовала по Рагата х Помни ! ﹄🥬накомо ? тогда добро пожаловать в наш ☺️☺️ ! Здесь вы можете поделиться контентом по нашему любимому пейрингу ♡ ⊹ 🤩 ☺️ժოíղs: ▻ [💘] лакрица — 🤩 — влд ▻ [🤩/🚨] Шазам — 🤩/🤩— тейкер ▻ В…
Signed прянек
Я ненавижу таких людей,которые сначала заходят на смену.. А ПОТОМ ЧЕРЕЗ ОДНУ СМЕНУ УХОДЯТ.. ╰┈➤ 「 @ahdontlikebot | @animalhosnolove 」
❤8🔥2
Signed Take AHDL
Раз уж насчет шипов… Не очень классно, что часто персонажи в пейрингах какие-то… неестественные. Характера нет. Или часто повторяющиеся характеры, к примеру секретный агент очень часто какой-то сигма-альфа-самец-волк-одиночка-холодный-мрачный. Люди, где фантазия? ╰┈➤ 「 @ahdontlikebot | @animalhosnolove 」
❤3🔥2✍1
Signed Take AHDL
Меня бесит такая особа как Чика… (я понимаю, она рейджбайтер и т. д., но все равно) Кто понял тот понял ╰┈➤ 「 @ahdontlikebot | @animalhosnolove 」
Signed Take AHDL
Раз тема зашла про пейры, мне не нравятся шипы с медсестрой Ну вообще все Она мне сама не нравится, не знаю почему, просто отталкивает. Но главмедсестру я наоборот оч люблю Насчет любимого шипа, мне понравился барни/интерн, из-за того что мне в тт часто попадается художник, который рисует их. И вот, подсел ╰┈➤ 「 @ahdontlikebot | @animalhosnolove 」
❤4🐳1
Signed Take AHDL
Мне не нравится что в игре дают приз если ты скрываешь маньяка. Это как-то неправильно, учитывая что 70% фд это дети. Было бы логичнее если бы за сдачу Барни тоже давали приз ╰┈➤ 「 @ahdontlikebot | @animalhosnolove 」
❤4
Signed Take AHDL
Мьэ мьэ тема шипов.. ну давайте я начну,есть вроде канон шип, главмедсестра и агент, и меня просто глаз дёргается когда из них делают омег -3-, Барни и Сталкер,он.. не популярный,но моя знакомая его обожает, боже,это пиздец :-P неанон КЕЙНИ ╰┈➤ 「 @ahdontlikebot | @animalhosnolove 」
❤1
Signed Take AHDL
Меня триггерит шип с агентом и стажером. В каком боке это начали шипперить? Типо "бесплатные и платные персонажи так хорошо вместе смотрятся!" ╰┈➤ 「 @ahdontlikebot | @animalhosnolove 」
❤2🤡2
Signed Take AHDL
Меня очень триггернул этот тип. Блат. Он ВСЕ ВРЕМЯ стоял на чек-ине и НИХЕРА не делал, кроме как брать кофе Из-за этого к нас сдохла медсестра, а я все время жило на 25-30 рассудка чисто из-за третьего уровня на секретном агенте И это создание, бляхт, убило пациента и катка кончилась, так как у нас до этого сдохло два пациента на скорой помощи, т. к. этот дебиллоид нихера не делал ╰┈➤ 「 @ahdontlikebot | @animalhosno…
Signed Take AHDL
Мы как то будем говорить то что щас в лобби стало сборище людей которые говорят и орут в войс? Не ну я недавно заходил там люди есть в любое время с войсом,нену мб это я невезучий но я там вижу - отдельный вид фудкорта нахуй неанон КЕЙНИ ╰┈➤ 「 @ahdontlikebot | @animalhosnolove 」
❤4🐳2👍1
Signed Take AHDL
А вас, случаем, ничего не бесит? 🥺
😱1
Учавствовать всем сейчас же
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @animalhosnolove. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“в Animal Hospital ☒ нᴇ ᴧюбяᴛ” (@animalhosnolove), 237 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/animalhosnolove.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.