Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for همسات إيمانيه

Channel

همسات إيمانيه

@anhar0000

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

371subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001207646336
TypeChannel
Username@anhar0000
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/anhar0000

Growth

371372371.56 August 2026 — 372 subscribers6 August 2026 — 372 subscribers14 August 2026 — 371 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 371–372 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 06:07371-1
6 Aug 2026, 20:33372no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:03372first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.70%
avg views ÷ 371 subscribers
Avg views / post
10.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (23 June 20263 August 2026)
Views total20
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 20:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 11:08 UTC27 viewsread 6 August 2026

أجر لك وأجر لي ساهم معي في التبرع لـ (صدقه بنية شفاء ابو عبدالرحمن) عبر #منصة_إحسان: https://ehsan.sa/campaign/5C8E1DBA7C

19 Jul 2026, 20:30 UTC50 viewsread 6 August 2026

حبايبي يااجمل حب في الله لعل منكم من هي اقرب منا إلى الله والدي عبدالله الحجيلي في العناية المركزه وحالته خطيره ارجوا منكم الدعاء له في ظهر الغيب بأن يرفع الله عنه الضر ويشفيه احبكم في الله

29 Jun 2026, 17:02 UTC77 viewsread 6 August 2026

🌸🌸 ‏لا شيءَ يطبطبُ على القلبِ مثلَ جُرعةِ إيمان فلاتحزني قوليها لقلبك لنفسك لاتحزني إن الله معنا لاتحزني يانفسي مادمتي صابرة فالله معك وعدك الله بمعيته بوجوده معك (إن الله مع الصابرين) لاتحزني يانفسي مادام ان جبهتي تصل للأرض وتتلذذ بالسجود والحديث مع رب العالمين والشكوى لأحكم الحاكمين لاتحزني يانفسي ردديها مع نفسك إذا إصابتك المصيبه أو صبرتي على طاعة الله أو تركتي ماأحببتي لأجل الله فالدنيا فانيه وغدا نلقى الأحبه مح

26 Jun 2026, 05:48 UTC56 viewsread 6 August 2026

"‌‌‏#مخطئ_من_يظن أن الابتلاء نقمة، بل هو نعمة من الله، ليطهرك وينقيك ويغسلك من ذنوبك، ليرفع منزلتك وينعم عليك بالأجر، ليعطيك أجر الصابرين ليجعلك في معيته تحت نظره محاط برحمته اصبر صبرا جميلا وتنعم بمعية الله معك وتلذذ بمناجاته وانت تشكوه وأنس به وانت تخلو به وتشكو إليه مطمئنا بسمع الرحمن لشكواك، ابتلاك ليستخرج من قلبك أجمل مافيه عبوديتك له، تذلل قلبك بين يديه وهو مكسوريبكي بين يديه، يسأله اغنني، ارحمني، أجبرني، عوضني

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @anhar0000. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 474,651 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“همسات إيمانيه” (@anhar0000), 371 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anhar0000.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.