Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for anguishxcvhq

Channel

anguishxcvhq

@anguish404

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

645subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002473944935
TypeChannel
Username@anguish404
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 October 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 9 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/anguish404

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

645658651.57 August 2026 — 657 subscribers8 August 2026 — 657 subscribers8 August 2026 — 658 subscribers22 August 2026 — 657 subscribers6 September 2026 — 658 subscribers14 September 2026 — 655 subscribers29 September 2026 — 645 subscribers7 August 202629 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 53 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 643–660 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Sept 2026, 17:20645-10
14 Sept 2026, 17:20655-3
6 Sept 2026, 19:16658+1
22 Aug 2026, 04:59657-1
8 Aug 2026, 05:18658+1
8 Aug 2026, 02:35657no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:32657first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

190 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 536202796336363211413973.2%
custom 53616824074748632103820.0%
custom 5346323591539468765105.26%
custom 536179698002245100231.58%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 190 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 20:09 UTC465 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

NQ 29.07.2025 idk why preview died 1h - https://www.tradingview.com/x/mFVhckVv/ 15M - https://www.tradingview.com/x/fAFlTUFX/ 1M - https://www.tradingview.com/x/qcOvh6zL/

custom 536202796336363211411

27 Jul 2026, 18:54 UTC521 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

NQ 24.07.2025 1h - https://www.tradingview.com/x/dqxMLwF9/ 15M - https://www.tradingview.com/x/GqvWFxQv/ 1M - https://www.tradingview.com/x/2Wcz2Pab/

custom 536168240747486321012

23 Jul 2026, 23:13 UTC669 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

NQ 23.07.2025 4h - https://www.tradingview.com/x/5X1WzLvF/ 1h - https://www.tradingview.com/x/B044xcYu/ 15M - https://www.tradingview.com/x/6JOJPNpd/ 1M - https://www.tradingview.com/x/7Ua0sutj/

custom 53616824074748632107custom 53463235915394687653custom 53617969800224510023

22 Jul 2026, 11:59 UTC556 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

NQ 22.07.2025(ik 2026) 4h - https://www.tradingview.com/x/ySz3YZtL/ 15M - https://www.tradingview.com/x/kJY3PGSK/ 5M - https://www.tradingview.com/x/qxPPx6pR/

custom 536202796336363211413

21 Jul 2026, 21:40 UTC561 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ES/NQ 20.07.2025 ES 4h - https://www.tradingview.com/x/6C4sUmj6/ 1h - https://www.tradingview.com/x/FyCNsMFB/ 15M - https://www.tradingview.com/x/WQtI8SgP/ 5M - https://www.tradingview.com/x/vIOvY6p9/ positions - https://www.tradingview.com/x/Tp9BK1Gu/ NQ 1h - https://www.tradingview.com/x/c3H3os3c/ 15M - https://www.tradingview.com/x/ws3vMfPN/ 1M - https://www.tradingview.com/x/nF4uVmaJ/

custom 536202796336363211412custom 53463235915394687653

18 Jun 2026, 14:19 UTC≈1,080 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ES 1h - https://www.tradingview.com/x/7roN9zbO/ 15M - https://www.tradingview.com/x/SX38xxKU/ 1M - https://www.tradingview.com/x/cLgDVcYH/

custom 53620279633636321149custom 53463235915394687654custom 53616824074748632103

10 Jun 2026, 09:51 UTC≈1,400 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Today I’ll be doing a live backtest in our Discord. Feel free to join if you’re interested/

custom 536202796336363211410

8 Jun 2026, 20:14 UTC≈1,130 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

typa ya

custom 536202796336363211417

8 Jun 2026, 12:52 UTC≈1,040 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

While everyone is discussing the info business which I have nothing to do with nor participate in and honestly don’t care Im still off the charts but lets talk about the them. ES 1h - https://www.tradingview.com/x/hTWqgbjh/ overall i still believe in intraday long scenario inside fvg 4h due to HTF factors (RB D -> PDL resweep + inside day move and possibility of fvg 1D forming for HTF short continuation idea) and t…

custom 53620279633636321144

5 Jun 2026, 21:08 UTC957 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

custom 53620279633636321144

30 May 2026, 16:38 UTC≈1,300 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 53620279633636321147custom 53616824074748632106

27 May 2026, 14:32 UTC≈1,340 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ES 1M - https://www.tradingview.com/x/xDxuixAH/

custom 53620279633636321143

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @anguish404. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“anguishxcvhq” (@anguish404), 645 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anguish404.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.