Channel
@angry_media1991
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
300subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001807334360 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @angry_media1991 |
| Created | 8 August 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/angry_media1991 |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 13:56 | 300 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:27 | 301 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 300 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:22 | 300 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
128 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 33 | 25.8% | |
| 😁 | 19 | 14.8% | |
| ❤ | 14 | 10.9% | |
| custom 5330202139736156329 | 13 | 10.2% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 10.2% | |
| 🤡 | 6 | 4.69% | |
| 🤯 | 6 | 4.69% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 3.91% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 3.91% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 3.13% | |
| 😭 | 4 | 3.13% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 2.34% | |
| 😈 | 2 | 1.56% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.781% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 March 2025 to 3 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Приватна клініка у Львові відмовила чоловіку в запису, бо він розмовляє російською мовою. Ось така «лагідна» українізація відбувається на західній Україні. Говори державною або здохни 🤯 Ще епічніше було б , якби хлопець виявився якимось військовим родом із Бахмуту або Волновахи. Ось така у нас ОДНА ЄДИНА СОБОРНА УКРАЇНА 🤷♂️
🤬3👍2😱2
Який жах ! Зірвали дівчині концерт 😭 Чи хлопцю 😁 так і не зрозумів
😁3
🔺Противники ЛГБТ сорвали концерт певца Melovin в Ровно, — СМИ Сообщается, что они пришли с плакатами и скандировали: "Не за гей-браки воюют герои". Напомним, на днях Melovin сообщил о расставании со своим парнем — военнослужащим Петром.
😁6❤3🤬2😭1
Просто зараз в моєму помешканні проводяться слідчі дії. Мені нічого приховувати, моя діяльність - на долоні. Втім, час та контекст цих подій наштовхують на однозначні висновки: вбачаю в цьому прямий тиск на опозицію та спробу заблокувати мою політичну діяльність через принципову позицію. ❗️Про подальший розвиток подій повідомлятиму. Telegram | Facebook | Youtube | Короткі нарізки Tik-Tok
😁3🤬2😭1
https://youtu.be/fygPhGIj-Yk Друзі, вийшов свіжий подкаст з адвокатом Тетяною Шупик. Особливо корисним він буде далі військових. Приємного перегляду 😉
Хозяин предприятия кому-то не заплатил? Решили наказать и отправить ОПГ.
🤬3
GTA на мінімалках. 🚓 Поліція вже бамперами збиває ухилянтів, за якими не може наздогнати ТЦК.
🔥2
https://youtu.be/jVDjfXRs4No?si=TE-J2a7MX4JxF5lx Подкаст с адвоката та народним депутатом ! Сергій Касянчук - адвокат та Георгій Мазурашу- депутат завітали в гості, щоб обговорити найболючіші але актуальні як ніколи теми. І як так сталося, що одна структура вчиняє терор проти цілого народу, а президент і влада цього не бачать. 🤷♂️ Ну і звісно задались питанням, як це можна виправити в куди слід рухатись далі.
🔥3🤡2
Мовний патруль курсує вже і в українських поїздах 🤯 Цікаво.🤔 Чому ця патріоткиня досі не в окопі ? Хлопцю респект. 🤝 Вчинив мудро, як справжній чоловік: не чіпай 💩 і смердіти не буде.
🤯4🤡2
Українські жінки найкращі 👏🫶💚 #вільні_люди_вільної_країни
❤6👍1
Сказочный долб@ёб !
custom 53302021397361563299👍4💯3🤡2
В Луцке настоящая жесть 15 (!!!) сотрудников ТЦК устроили охоту на мужчину. Кидали в него камнями, залили газом, после чего затащили в бусик, как скот. Поддержать Крокодила.
🤬7
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @angry_media1991. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЗЛИЙ ЖУРНАЛІСТ” (@angry_media1991), 300 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/angry_media1991.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.