Channel
@angelwildsuperstar
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
95subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002214726199 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @angelwildsuperstar |
| Description | don’t tell me our youth is running out it’s only just begun!!!!!!!!!! |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/angelwildsuperstar |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:30 | 95 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 95 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (26 July 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,306 |
| Reactions total | 130 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
130 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5296573709744642578 | 42 | 32.3% | |
| custom 5197218360135263365 | 31 | 23.8% | |
| custom 5296675466109821244 | 28 | 21.5% | |
| custom 5192916452172128303 | 22 | 16.9% | |
| custom 5296631429810133067 | 4 | 3.08% | |
| custom 5434130246536295877 | 3 | 2.31% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 130reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @angelwildsuperstar. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
one thing about me я буду делать миллион видео со своими френдами
custom 519721836013526336513custom 52965737097446425784custom 52966754661098212444custom 51929164521721283031
if someone writes a platonic version of casual by chappell roan lmk
custom 52966754661098212447custom 52965737097446425783custom 51929164521721283032
ранкинг вопросов к вселенной каким образом я стала одной из тысячи избранных на которых подписалась жюстин трие как заставить себя посмотреть саксешен почему мэшап раката с я тебя могну звучит как будто так и было задумано
custom 529657370974464257811custom 51929164521721283036custom 52966754661098212446
i don’t feel educated enough to write a proper review of sisi & ich considering that it’s a period drama but this film absolutely blew me away. the refined visuals in muted warm tones, the nineteenth century atmosphere, the wonderful women, the emotional rollercoaster, the fantastic soundtrack, the bold cinematography…… spectacular give me fourteen of them!!!!!!
custom 52966754661098212448custom 51929164521721283034
sandra hüller’s characters are a litmus test to see whether someone is worth your time. you could ask people “is eva stratt problematic?” and “do you think sandra voyter killed her husband or not?” and their reaction to these questions will tell you everything
custom 519721836013526336510
жюстин трие интересно играет с восприятием зрителя, представляя нам одну за другой различные теории и версии — некоторые из которых визуализируются, а другие остаются в аудиоформате или в виде простого повествования — заставляя нас погрузиться в судебный процесс и делать выводы, опираясь исключительно на тех же материалах, которыми располагают сами персонажи фильм не даёт однозначного ответа на главный вопрос — убил…
custom 52965737097446425786custom 52966314298101330673
#review anatomy of a fall (2023) dir. justine triet "stop. i did not kill him." "that’s not the point." я считаю, что мизогиния является центральной темой этого фильма (особенно с учётом того, что он был вдохновлен делом эмбер хёрд), хотя это и не говорится прямо. большинство людей автоматически считают главную героиню виновной, поскольку она не вписывается в стереотип послушной, незаметной и кроткой женщины. проку…
custom 52965737097446425786custom 51929164521721283032custom 52966754661098212442
оказывается разделение все таки мне не приснилось
custom 51972183601352633652
yes i will forever yap about my favourite fictional women idgaf
custom 51929164521721283036custom 52965737097446425784custom 51972183601352633651
something about red-headed female characters who perceive themselves as nothing more than an instrument, reject their own personhood for the sake of what they deem the greater good, and turn to religion as a coping mechanism is deeply compelling to me (helena eagan, marilyn thornhill and eva stratt i am looking straight at you)
custom 52965737097446425788custom 54341302465362958773custom 51972183601352633652custom 51929164521721283031custom 52966314298101330671custom 52966754661098212441
экзекуция была бы добрее
custom 51972183601352633653
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @angelwildsuperstar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,269,941 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“bachelorette party bar 𖦹” (@angelwildsuperstar), 95 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/angelwildsuperstar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.