Channel
@angel_wolf25
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
32subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004426217541 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @angel_wolf25 |
| Description | 𝗹𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗸𝗮𝘆𝗮𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹 || новости об экранизации поклонника 🌹 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 19 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/angel_wolf25 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 32 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 32 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (19 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 769 |
| Reactions total | 36 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
36 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 24 | 66.7% | |
| 💘 | 10 | 27.8% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ПОДРОБНОСТИ ПРО ЭКРАНИЗАЦИЮᡣ𐭩 —на кинопоиске появилась вкладка про экранизацию «поклонника», написанны пока лишь, только продюсеры, а именно: —СЕРГЕЙ ЕРШОВ —НАТАЛЬЯ ГОРИНА они будут заниматься данной экранизацией🙏🏻 —так же Наталья Горина отметила немного про экранизацию поклонника, представленные слова прикрепляются немного выше, они планируют взаимодействовать с фан базой, чтоб сохранить ту же атмосферу и ключевые…
❤2💘1
МАТВЕЙ ВЕСЕЛОВ & ПЕТР КАРПОВ –как же он хорош, новый кандидат на роль матвея веселова, как вам? какого вы видите в данной роли?🫂 –делитесь своими мнениями) #поклонник #матвейвеселов
❤3💘1
Дорогие поклонники! Мы ежедневно видим ваши отметки, читаем комментарии и просто тонем в море сообщений в наших группах. И знаете что? Это невероятно вдохновляет! Ваша поддержка — это лучшее топливо для творчества. Вы — наша главная сила, и мы хотим быть к вам ещё ближе. Поэтому мы открываем специальный почтовый ящик, который создан исключительно для вас! ✨ 📩 Почта для связи: [email protected] Для чего она нужна…
❤1💘1
«Ведьму» обсудили, настало время для нового народного голосования he-he-he... 🔤🔤🔤🔤из актеров и актрис вы бы хотели увидеть в роли главных героев «Поклонника»?❤️ 🔤Скидывайте свои фанкасты в комментариях! Кто наши Матвей и Ангелина, дорогие?
❤1
🩷✨ главные претенденты на роли экранизации «Поклонник» Анны Джейн?! Дружочки, всем привет! Сегодня предлагаю вам обсудить фанатские версии касаемо ролей Ангелины и Матвея из «Поклонника» Анны Джейн)) Ваши главные претенденты: Иван Нестеренко, Данила Краснов, Лолита Таборко А еще мне только что написали о Диане Лыщик, я её просто обожаю и, мне кажется, о ней тоже стоит задуматься!! 🩷✨ Давайте обсуждать с вами - ка…
❤1
УСПЕЙ ЗАПОЛНИТЬ ФОРМУ ДО 2️⃣6️⃣ ИЮЛЯ Дорогие поклонники! 💖 Огромное спасибо каждому, кто уже заполнил нашу опросную форму. Ваши ответы бесценны — именно вы помогаете нам сделать экранизацию книги Анны Джейн «Поклонник» по-настоящему живой и любимой. ❗️Но есть важное предупреждение! Если вы до сих пор откладывали заполнение на «потом», ловите дедлайн: форма закроется уже 26 июля в 23:59! 🔖 Пройти опрос можно здес…
❤3
Лолита Таборко&Андрей Нестеренко –мои фавориты на сегодняшний день 🙏🏻
❤3
ПРОЙДИ ОПРОС — ПОВЛИЯЙ НА ФИЛЬМ «ПОКЛОННИК» Дорогие поклонники творчества Анны Джейн 💖 Просим вас принять участие в опросе, который проводят официальные создатели будущей экранизации романа «Поклонник». У вас есть реальная возможность повлиять на фильм и рассказать, какие герои, сцены и сюжетные линии особенно важно сохранить. Здесь нет правильных или неправильных ответов — нам важно именно ваше мнение. 🔖 Пройти…
❤1
Лолита Табарко&Ангелина Ланская КАК ЖЕ ОНА ИДЕАЛЬНО ПОДХОДИТ НА РОЛЬ АНГЕЛИНЫ 🙏🏻 буквально она!
❤5
АНАСТАСИЯ КРАВЧЕНЯ&АНДРЕЙ НЕСТЕРЕНКО🫂 —ну какие, фото сделано через ии, но мне кажется они прям подходят,очень красивые!
💘3❤2💋2
⊹БУКТРЕЙЛЕР К «ПОКЛОННИКУ»— я уже безумно счастлива,что выйдет именно эта экранизация, обожаю эту книгу, и очень надеюсь на то, что подберут идеальный каст, и все хорошо отснимут,уже ждем с нетерпением) –а вы как думаете кто подходит на роль Ангелины и Матвея?
💘4❤2
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @angel_wolf25. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,194,834 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⊹ ࣪ ˖𝗹𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗸𝗮𝘆𝗮𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹ᡣ𐭩| ОБ ЭКРАНИЗАЦИИ ПОКЛОННИКА˖” (@angel_wolf25), 32 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/angel_wolf25.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.