导航分类,点击直接跳转 尾巴888 - 尾巴888 2 - 尾巴888 3 尾巴888 4 点击直接跳转
Channel
尾巴888
@angbaofu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004399380972 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @angbaofu |
| Created | 18 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/angbaofu |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 3 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 3 | first reading |
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3922.2%
- avg views ÷ 3 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 118
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 7 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (18 July 2026 – 18 July 2026) |
| Views total | 706 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Links
- 5
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
尾巴888 4 @a4i88 68 @b4t88 68 @c0i88 68 @c9h88 68 @d7w88 68 @h0w88 68 @h2i88 68 @h9i88 68 @h9w88 68 @j0o88 68 @j7w88 68 @m5t88 68 @m6k88 68 @n2m88 68 @n2q88 68 @n4ppn 68 @o3p88 68 @o40777 98 @o46777 98 @o5v88 68 @o9p88 68 @p4a88 68 @p6h88 68 @q0x88 68 @q3v88 68 @q7v88 68 @r9l88 68 @s2u88 68 @s4v88 68 @t5l88 68 @w3q88 68 @w5g88 68 @y4d88 68 @y7f88 68 @z3v88 68 🛫🛫🛫🛫 回到导航 🛫🛫🛫🛫
1
尾巴888 @ecj888 98 @ejd888 98 @ejn888 98 @ejr888 98 @ejv888 98 @eqt888 98 @erf888 98 @eug888 98 @exi88 98 @exr888 98 @eyc888 98 @ezl888 98 @fjv888 98 @fmv888 98 @fnv888 98 @fvk888 98 @gbv888 98 @gdo888 98 @gfv888 98 @gro888 98 @gwa888 98 @hci888 98 @hqo888 98 好气哦888 @hqu888 98 @hvm888 98 @hvw888 98 @ibf888 98 @ift888 98 @ifv888 98 @ihb888 98 @ihk888 98 @ihn888 98 @ijd888 98 @ije888 98 @ikf888 98 @inh888 98 @ipz888…
尾巴888 2 @bqi888 188 霸气888 @dso888 98 @ecx888 98 @egt888 98 @ehp888 98 @ejg888 98 @ejl888 98 @ejp888 98 @ejq888 98 @ekn888 98 @emh888 98 @emq888 98 @eof888 98 @eqy888 98 @eyb888 98 @eyh888 98 @eyj888 98 @fda888 188 发达888 @fhe888 98 符合888 @fik888 98 @fje888 98 @fju888 98 分局888 @fti888 168 防踢888 @fvi888 98 @fvm888 98 @gcu888 98 果醋888 @gcv888 98 @gpi888 98 @gvz888 98 @gwv888 98 官网v888 @hvt888 98 @hwe888 98 @hwv888 …
尾巴888 3 @aaca888 98 @aaza888 98 @cacc888 98 @ccuc888 98 @ccvc888 98 @cecc888 98 @crcc888 98 @cucc888 98 @dri888 98 @dru888 98 @eeue888 98 @eeve888 98 @eexe888 98 @efe888 98 @eji888 98 @elu888 98 @elw888 98 @eqs888 98 @equ888 98 @exi888 98 @ezb888 98 @fdo888 98 风波888 @fkv888 98 @fpu888 98 @fqo888 98 @fqv888 98 @grv888 98 @gvo888 98 @gze888 188 规则 @gzu888 188 贵族 @hvq888 98 @hvu888 98 @ifs888 98 @igy888 98 @ihf8…
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @angbaofu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 2,954 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@bb0w0 · 21 postcaichanchan
@caichanchan · 31 postcaotata
@caotata · 31 postcc7t7
@cc7t7 · 31 postchusuansuan
@chusuansuan · 21 postfeishishi
@feishishi · 61 postff9a9
@ff9a9 · 21 postjinlielie
@jinlielie · 41 postjj4c4
@jj4c4 · 31 postjve888
@jve888 · 21 postlahuihui
@lahuihui · 41 postll6w6
@ll6w6 · 21 postnn7q7
@nn7q7 · 41 postpanniuniu
@panniuniu · 21 postpp6e6
@pp6e6 · 21 postqikangkang
@qikangkang · 21 postss9g9
@ss9g9 · 21 posttangpaipai
@tangpaipai · 21 postuuu66e
@uuu66e · 31 postvv9y9
@vv9y9 · 31 postxitantan
@xitantan · 31 postyizongzong
@yizongzong · 31 postyy8c8
@yy8c8 · 41 postzzzllg
@zzzllg · 21 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@angbaofu named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“尾巴888” (@angbaofu), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/angbaofu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.