Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Андросов Сергей

Channel

Андросов Сергей

@androsov_pro

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,785subscribers

-26 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001652304471
TypeChannel
Username@androsov_pro
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/androsov_pro

Growth

1,7851,8111,7987 August 2026 — 1,811 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,810 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,799 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,790 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,785 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,781–1,815 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 12:431,785-5
14 Aug 2026, 09:561,790-9
10 Aug 2026, 17:411,799-11
7 Aug 2026, 12:501,810-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:321,811first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.1%
avg views ÷ 1,785 subscribers
Avg views / post
181
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (21 April 20267 August 2026)
Views total362
Reactions total56
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

384 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥10627.6%
8020.8%
❤‍🔥7920.6%
👍4411.5%
custom 53325720769202988873910.2%
🤯133.39%
custom 5336916024023345490123.13%
😁92.34%
👏20.521%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 384reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 20 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @androsov_pro. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 April 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTC150 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Когда ваш блог становится слишком большим, государство начинает считать его немного своим. Нет, это не шутка! Каждый месяц мы согласуем договоры на размещение социальной рекламы для крупных блогеров. Недавно я поймал себя на мысли, что большинство блогеров даже не подозревают о наличии обязательной для размещения рекламы. Ну что ж. Присаживайтесь. Оказывается, если ваш блог становится достаточно крупным, и каждый д

9

6 Aug 2026, 06:10 UTC212 views47 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026

Мой собственный бизнес оказался в стадии серьезной перестройки. Вы могли это заметить по дате последнего поста - он был больше месяца назад. Честно говоря, последние изменения в экономике не обошли и нас. Иногда я вспоминал мем про два состояние любого предпринимателя (с утра ты богат, вечером у тебя предбанкротное состояние). Но есть одна вещь, которую я давно понял не только как юрист, но и как предприниматель.

🔥2614👍6❤‍🔥1

26 Jun 2026, 07:04 UTC563 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Самозанятые все! Или не все? В сети опять паника: «С 1 октября самозанятым запретят работать с одним заказчиком больше 6 месяцев». Звучит как похороны самозанятости под грустную музыку ФНС. Но нет. Не всё так красиво. Реальная суть изменений такая: если самозанятый или ИП работает через цифровую платформу на одного заказчика больше 60 часов в месяц в течение 6 месяцев подряд, платформа должна ограничить такую работ

12👍12🔥4

4 Jun 2026, 13:38 UTC520 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌟 Вы уверены, что бизнес, который вы строите, принадлежит вам? Большинство предпринимателей отвечают «ну конечно мой», и ошибаются Потому что вы вложили деньги, время, нервы, собрали команду, сняли контент, упаковали продукт, раскрутили канал, придумали название. А потом в один день приходит человек - подрядчик, бывший партнёр, конкурент или просто незнакомец, и говорит: «Спасибо, что раскрутили, теперь это моё»

custom 53369160240233454906👍2🔥2

1 Jun 2026, 13:13 UTC497 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Куча претензий, суды, ФАС и риск потерять большие деньги - именно так мы встретили лето 2026 года. В этом посте расскажу более подробно про последние кейсы наших клиентов. ▶️ Кейс первый. Неожиданный. Предприниматель использовал обозначение для шиномонтажа. Но потом оказалось, что похожее обозначение уже защищено. Правообладатель пришел в суд. Просил 5 миллионов рублей!!! Итог - присудили 500 000 рублей компенсаци

custom 533257207692029888711❤‍🔥5

31 May 2026, 17:01 UTC358 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥8🔥2

31 May 2026, 16:00 UTC387 views16 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📍 Как легко потерять 500 000 рублей, не зная всего одного правила? Вы каждый день встречаетесь с этим, но о нем не знает 90% предпринимателей. На самом деле все просто. Один из моих клиентов уже «очень тесно» познакомился с этим правилом. Назовите свой бизнес, курс, продукт, Telegram-канал или группу так, как уже кто-то назвал до вас. И всё, можно даже не воровать логотип, не копировать сайт, не притворяться чужи

custom 53325720769202988878custom 53369160240233454904👍31

28 May 2026, 16:25 UTC419 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

▶️ Суд взыскал 250.000 за курс даже при открытии ученику доступов к урокам. Разберем свежее решение Приморского районного суда Санкт-Петербурга. Клиент купил образовательный онлайн-курс за 252 760 рублей. После начала обучения клиент решил отказаться от курса и попросил вернуть деньги за непройденную часть. Исполнитель ответил: мы можем вернуть только 68 841 рубль, потому что вам был открыт доступ к 9 модулям из 13

custom 533257207692029888714👍5👏21

26 May 2026, 14:53 UTC425 views21 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

📌📌📌📌 Возврат денег за онлайн‑продукт: почему «возврата нет» больше не спасает Если вы продаете онлайн‑продукт, доступ к материалам, курс, консультации или программу, политику возврата нужно прописывать аккуратно. 📍 Главная ошибка писать в договоре: «Денежные средства возврату не подлежат» Так делать нельзя. У потребителя есть право отказаться от договора оказания услуг. Исполнитель может удержать не «сколько захоче

🔥12custom 53325720769202988876custom 53369160240233454902👍1

24 May 2026, 10:23 UTC468 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📍 Меня часто спрашивают: «А чем вы вообще занимаетесь?» Отвечу честно. Канал посвящён мне и моей специализации, инфобизнес, шоу-бизнес, защита блогеров, певцов, актёров, инфо-предпринимателей. Это то, что я лично веду и развиваю внутри компании. Но компания - это не только я. Вот что мы реально делаем каждый день: - Получаем образовательные лицензии - Регистрируем товарные знаки - Создаём компании: от обычного ООО

👍12🔥8❤‍🔥41

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @androsov_pro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Apr 2026, 10:16 UTCAnonymous Poll49 voters

Покупаете / продаете криптовалюту?

  1. Да, стабильно и без проблем22%
  2. Да, с некоторыми сложностями10%
  3. Нет, не понимаю как делать это безопасно, но хотел/а бы22%
  4. Нет, не интересен этот инструмент37%
  5. Слышал/а о рисках, боюсь использовать8%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 870,075 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Андросов Сергей” (@androsov_pro), 1,785 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/androsov_pro.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.