Один сторителлинг + 4 заявки, из них 3 продажи А все почему? Потому что делаем только сторис точечно, закрываем нужные нам смыслы А точнее, смыслы нужные человеку для принятия решения о покупке
🥰2

Channel
@andrewigrch_launch
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
76subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002384767646 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @andrewigrch_launch |
| Description | Здесь делюсь своими мыслями и выводами по инфобизу. Сотрудничество: @li0n_tg |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/andrewigrch_launch |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 76 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 76 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 15 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (15 March 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 261 |
| Reactions total | 13 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
42 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 47.6% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 42.9% | |
| custom 5208601921845208724 | 2 | 4.76% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 4.76% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 15 March 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Один сторителлинг + 4 заявки, из них 3 продажи А все почему? Потому что делаем только сторис точечно, закрываем нужные нам смыслы А точнее, смыслы нужные человеку для принятия решения о покупке
🥰2
Выложу сюда чтобы не потерять Люблю отзывы 🤝
❤6
⚡️ Теперь официально: легализация криптовалюты в России Закон об обращении криптовалют подписан Президентом РФ Владимиром Путиным. Он вступит в силу с 1 сентября, за исключением некоторых положений. 💘 Как можно будет работать с криптовалютой? 💘 Какие есть нюансы и ограничения? Главное, что нужно знать о законе, — читайте по ссылке: ☀️ https://kod.ru/zakon-o-kripte-prinyat-glavnoe
Как вам такие новости ?
Posted without readable text
🔥3
Выдал ученице структуру лидмагнита для ее продукта ученица в нише здоровье и фитнес, есть свой Evergreen продукт Задача — записать лид магнит, который заводит новую аудиторию в воронку, утепляет через сам лид магнит + продает сам продукт Ученица не поняла «это структура лид магнита или моего продукта в целом?» К сожалению часто вижу это заблуждение на практике, когда человек получает лид магнит, а дальше с челове…
Posted without readable text
Домен t.me недоступен Как же выдать ссылку на телеграм канал пока работу не восстановили ? Все просто. Берем в канале ссылку типа t.me/andrewigrch_launch И вместо http://t.me подставляем полный домен telegram.me/andrewigrch_launch Не благодарите) UPD: Ссылки telegram.me не вставляются в сторис в инстаграм Для инстаграм вот эти два работают: Tlgg.ru/username Tlgme.app/username
❤2
Недавно решил структурировать: что конкретно я использую для повышения продаж какие фишки и инструменты ? Сел выписывать, и понял что я использую в работе дохера. Не буду тут писать полотно, но поделюсь частью: 1. Разные каналы базы (тг канал, тг бот, старые каналы интенсивов, емаил) 2. Пробовать разные CTA (не только призыв заполнить анкету) 3. Продавать брони места на курс — супер крутой инструмент 4. Дедлайны …
🔥2
Оцените сайт на который не потрачено ни копейки денег https://lodusya.ru/page11 Ах да, только на подписку Клода 20 баксов Просто ИИ + сайт на базе геткурса Очень интересно ваше мнение P.s. обещания и офферы на сайте не воспринимайте в серьез, некоторые из них мы не даем, нужно допилить.
🔥5❤1
Лето для меня это всегда период большой работы минимум отдыха и максимум задач Мы буквально недавно завершили продажи в одном проекте, и параллельно начали продажи во втором проекте 🔥 Я еще даже отдохнуть не успел, но мне это все пздц как нравится
❤4
Video message, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @andrewigrch_launch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 466,461 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мюсли продюсера | Andrewigrch” (@andrewigrch_launch), 76 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/andrewigrch_launch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.