Channel
@andrew_generator
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
9subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001622121299 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @andrew_generator |
| Description | Канал о чувстве вкуса, оригинальных штуках в творчестве и немного о себе 😜 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/andrew_generator |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 9 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:02 | 9 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 10 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
32 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 22 | 68.8% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 25.0% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 6.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2023 to 18 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Очередной большой привет векторной графике) Стилизация + многочасовая кропотливая отрисовка эскиза в вектор и вуаля) Прошу любить и жаловать) Запоминающаяся мелкодетализованная работа. Иногда собственные кропотливые сложные решения меня пугают, однако смотришь и понимаешь что все-таки оно того стоило 🤩
👍1
Новый сюжет, чтоб вы не заскучали. Посмотрим на одну и туже тему видео теперь уже с других углов и ракурсов. Приятного просмотра)
👍3
Памятное видео для рекламного ролика. Спасибо всем участникам, работа получилась классная и надеюсь понравится зрителям также как и мне) P.S. наконец я доволен результатом предварительных съемок 🤩
🔥3👍1
Сделаем вектором 😉
🔥2
И снова за долгое время приветствую всех на своем канале. Как и всегда не прекращаю свои попытки сделать наш обыденный повседневный мир немного красивей и прекрасней. Надеюсь очередная моя работа будет долго радовать меня, вас и моих заказчиков😊 Всем креативной осени и новых побед 😉
❤1
И также можно посмотреть на детали поближе теперь ☺️
🔥4
Ура) Finish it 😂 Всем хорошего настроения и приятного просмотра)
🔥4
Сегодня наконец четверг и я тоже сделал больше половины для завершения своей задумки. Надеюсь новые изменения вам понравятся также сильно как и мне. Полагаю еще 2-3 кропотливых сеанса и закончу этот проект)
🔥5
Странная штука творчество. Оно всегда исходит изнутри человека и каждый переживает творческий процесс по разному. Кто-то видит ясно результат и переносит его на любой носитель. Другие ищут верную ассоциацию и аллегорию и передают свои чувства, желания и переживания на холст, бумагу, фотографию, а то и вовсе выражаются в песне или танце. Некоторые через каждую минуту процесса как просмотр фильма или прослушивание мело…
👍3🔥1
Сегодня выдалось немного времени продолжить начатую работу. И тем временем картина начинает все больше оживать. Начинается самый долгий процесс наложение слоев, уточнение форм и проработка деталей. Конечно хочется побыстрее закончить, однако нет пока что такой возможности. Приятно всем просмотра)
❤1
Снова я решил сделать довольно большой и детальный проект. Мне захотелось поработать в масштабе. Задача не из легких скажу я вам. Руки помнят пропорции листа А4 формата, а с масштабом перенос пропорций в разы давался мне сложней. Однако, работа начата уже и есть желание ее довести до логичного завершения. 1е этапы я в порыве вдохновения забыл записать, зато сразу покажу как эта идея начинает оживать) Всем приятного п…
🔥3
Что проще по ментальным усилиям, но не по технике исполнения?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @andrew_generator. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что проще по ментальным усилиям, но не по технике исполнения?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2023 to 18 July 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Яркий мир Андрея” (@andrew_generator), 9 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/andrew_generator.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.