2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 161–163 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 16:46
162
no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:55
162
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 2 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,800
Videos
≈336
Links
≈290
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4m 49s
Average length
1m 12s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
26 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
17
65.4%
❤
6
23.1%
🔥
1
3.85%
😢
1
3.85%
🙏
1
3.85%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2025 to 8 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
سلام ودرود فراوان خدمت همه ی حضار عزیز 🌹دوستداران شطرنج واین کانال واساتیدی که افتخار حضورشان را در این کانال داشتیم 🌹
بنده محمد قلمزن (پیام ) از سال ۹۶ تا به الان، افتخار ادمینی وگذاشتن انواع محتواها (چه شطرنجی وچه غیر شطرنجی )را در این کانال داشتم
این کار را با عشق وبا تمام وجودم وصرفا برای دل خودم انجام میدادم ،
حالا امکان داشت یه سریا خوششان بیاد یه سری ها هم نه واین کاملا طبیعیه
به هر حال بعد از گذشت حدود ۸ سال …
❤1😢1
Signed ازصدایِ سخنِ عشق ندیدم خوشتریادگاری که دراین گنبدِدَوّاربِماند
سلام وعرض ادب و وقت بخیر 🌷
دارم نگاه میکنم ☝️تا الان ۴۵ بازدید و ۱۶ رای 👏
من در پست قبلی عرض کردم اگه رای دهندگان به عدد ۵۵ نرسه ،فعلا تا اطلاع ثانوی پستی نخواهم گذاشت ،
میخوام ببینم واقعا از این ۱۹۷ نفر که براشون از سال ۹۶ اینجا با عشق وقت میزارم و مطالب انتخاب میکنم ارزش وقت گذاشتن داره یانه
البته من با عشق وبی منت ومنفعت شخصی در تمام سالها این کارو انجام میدادم
بالاخره من فقط نباید انرژی دهنده باشم
از سمت شما ه…
❤3👍3🙏1
Signed ازصدایِ سخنِ عشق ندیدم خوشتریادگاری که دراین گنبدِدَوّاربِماند
سلام خدمت همگی 🌹با احترام اگر تعداد شرکت کنندگان در نظر سنجی اخیر به عدد ۵۵ نرسه فعلا تا اطلاع ثانوی پستی در این کانال نخواهم گذاشت
ارادتمند همگی عزیزان محمد قلمزن (پیام)
❤1
Signed ازصدایِ سخنِ عشق ندیدم خوشتریادگاری که دراین گنبدِدَوّاربِماند
سلام مجدد و وقت بخیر خدمت همگی عزیزان 🌹ببخشید در گزینه ها میشد نام مقصودلو، فیروزجا و طباطبایی را هم اضافه کرد
در هر صورت علاقه مند وطرفدار هر بازیکنی هستید که در حال حاضر بازی میکنه خوشحال میشم علاقه مندیتون را اینجا به اشتراک بزارید 😊
ارادتمند همگی عزیزان محمد قلمزن (پیام)
🔥1
Signed ازصدایِ سخنِ عشق ندیدم خوشتریادگاری که دراین گنبدِدَوّاربِماند
به شخصه به کدامیک از بازیکنان حال حاضر دنیا علاقه مندید ؟
گری کاسپارف کبیر و پیشکسوت29%
مگنوس کارلسن57%
فابیانو کاروانا9%
گوکش3%
ناکامورا9%
واسیلی ایوانچوک6%
ویسواناتان آناند11%
سایر بازیکنان9%
The shares total 133%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
سلام ودرود 🌷
یک بازی آنلاین زیبا از استاد جواد لواسانی براتون گذاشتم که امیدوارم لذت ببرید و استفاده کنید
«بازی آنلاین شطرنج»،
میتوان گفت شطرنج آنلاین یک سرگرمی محبوب است که به بازیکنان اجازه میدهد با افراد در سراسر جهان رقابت کنند. پلتفرمهای مختلفی برای این منظور وجود دارد که امکانات متنوعی مانند بازیهای رتبهبندی شده، مسابقات، آموزش و تجزیه و تحلیل بازی را ارائه میدهند. این بازیها معمولاً دسترسی آسان دارند و…
👍1
Signed ازصدایِ سخنِ عشق ندیدم خوشتریادگاری که دراین گنبدِدَوّاربِماند
سلام ودرود 🌷
نوبت با مشکی است ☝️☝️
به نظرتون نتیجه ی این بازی چه خواهد شد ؟
۱-برد سفید
۲-مساوی
لطفا اگر تمایل داشتید تحلیل وارزیابی خودتون را راجع به این پوزیسیون به اشتراک بگذارید
به زودی هم ویدیوی استاد را براتون خواهم گذاشت که به زیبایی وضعیت را برامون ارزیابی کردن
ارادتمند همگی دوستان محمد قلمزن (پیام)
👍1
Signed ازصدایِ سخنِ عشق ندیدم خوشتریادگاری که دراین گنبدِدَوّاربِماند
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @andishehchess. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
به شخصه به کدامیک از بازیکنان حال حاضر دنیا علاقه مندید ؟
گری کاسپارف کبیر و پیشکسوت29%
مگنوس کارلسن57%
فابیانو کاروانا9%
گوکش3%
ناکامورا9%
واسیلی ایوانچوک6%
ویسواناتان آناند11%
سایر بازیکنان9%
The shares total 133%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2025 to 8 May 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@andishehchess named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@fatemibook named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مدرسه شطرنج انديشه” (@andishehchess), 162 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/andishehchess.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.