Channel
@andSTBL
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
744subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001313985063 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @andSTBL |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/andSTBL |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 744 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 745 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 745 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
18 reactions across 7 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 18 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 January 2024 to 14 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5jtCeReNx12oajmV7SQ8Ejq | 1 | 30 January 2024 | 30 January 2024 |
| 5jtCeReNx12oajmV7fYCE38 | 1 | 2 February 2024 | 2 February 2024 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 January 2024 to 14 August 2025. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
🎯 О вебинаре, на который я всё-таки попал Давно слежу за Алексеем Стаценко и его каналом. До сегодняшнего дня всё как-то не складывалось, но тут звёзды сошлись. Тема эфира: "Телеграм-канал как инструмент развития интеллекта и духовности" Что сказать? Алексей в эфире такой же, как в постах — открытый, честный и без купюр. 💡 Мысль, которая зацепила: Реальность — это учитель. Можно от неё прятаться всю жизнь, а можн…
Focus Mode: как защитить свои лучшие 90 минут от всего мира В прошлом посте мы говорили о методе 3х90 — как выбрать главное и отработать его в защищенное время. Сегодня хочу поделиться конкретным инструментом, который стал для меня настоящим щитом: Focus Mode. Если вы помните, ключ к успеху — это не просто выбрать Big 3, а выполнить эти задачи. Вот где Focus Mode становится вашим союзником. 🛡 Что такое Focus Mode…
👍1
Метод 3х90: как сделать ГЛАВНОЕ за 90 минут В прошлом посте мы разобрали 3 ошибки, из-за которых списки растут, а важное стоит. Хорошая новость: есть простой выход — «Метод 3х90». Никакой сложной теории, только действие. Поехали! 1️⃣ «Сожги список» Смотрю на свой список дел — и вспоминаю дочь перед витриной сладостей. Те же растерянные глаза, то же «хочу всё сразу». Можно, конечно, методично просеивать пункты, оста…
👍3
3 фатальные ошибки в выборе задач (почему сложные системы тормозят вас) Утром составил список из 12 дел. Сделал 3. Остальные перенёс на завтра, список вырос до 20. Знакомо? Каждый день мы принимаем тысячи решений, мозг устаёт от этого и мы начинаем откладывать выполнение задач. Где же мы ошибаемся? Три ловушки: 1️⃣ Выбираем УДОБНОЕ, а не ЗНАЧИМОЕ Легкие задачи дают иллюзию прогресса. Проверить почту 10 раз? Понят…
👍2
🎯 Важно Этот пост для всех, кто недавно присоединился к каналу "Действуй → Достигай → Отдыхай: Цикл бесконечного развития". Кто я: Меня зовут Виталий. За 25 лет в бизнесе прошёл путь от запуска небольших производственных компаний с нуля до работы с крупнейшими FMCG-компаниями. Понял главное: результат зависит не от количества потраченного времени, а от выбора правильных задач и фокуса при их выполнении. Я не гуру…
👍5
Сколько времени вы можете работать НЕ ОТВЛЕКАЯСЬ над сложной задачей?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Выбери Главный Барьер (можно выбрать несколько)
The shares total 254%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Преграды на пути Регулярное выполнение ключевых задач — это фундамент позитивных изменений? Это то, что медленно, но верно ведет вперед, даже когда вокруг хаос. Каждая завершенная важная задача — кирпичик в стене вашего прогресса. Но прежде чем углубляться в нюансы глубокой работы и суперфокуса, нужно понять: что чаще всего подрывает ваши усилия? Какая преграда — ваш персональный главный враг — стоит между вами и в…
👍2
Хаос? Спасает простота и ОДНА задача. За год я понял: поток дел и информации растет как лавина. Мозг мечется, пытается ухватить все — и к вечеру часто ноль завершенных задач. Хаос побеждает. Спасает простота. Мой секрет — фокус на главном и безжалостное отсечение лишнего. Каждый день я выбираю ОДНУ ключевую задачу. Только после нее — следующая. Это работает как домино: первая костяшка роняет целую цепь. Без надрыва…
👍3
Друзья, я долго молчал — и это была не случайность. Когда живешь в Курской области, в 80 километрах от границы, где каждый день напоминает о хрупкости этого мира, а сигналы воздушной тревоги слышишь по 20 раз в день, начинаешь по-другому смотреть на жизнь. Приходится перетряхивать смыслы и цели, искать новые методы, которые работают, даже когда все летит к чертям. Мир вокруг меняется быстрее прогноза погоды — нужны…
👍2
Сон результат недели Продолжительность Получилось удержать длительность больше 7 часов. По ощущениям, мало, надо дотянуться хотя бы до 7 часов 15 минут. Кажется разница не большая, но тут есть порог, когда количество переходит в качество. Качество У меня получилось 86. Это лучше, чем у 75% пользователей программы. Но я сразу попытался улучшить качество сна. Я использовал ...., маску для сна и носки.) С маской для…
Как отдых влияет на нашу работоспособность? Наша способность сосредоточенно работать зависит от способности удерживать внимание на выполняемой задаче. Это не просто, на нас валится огромный объем информации. Что отвлекает от работы? Любые сигналы, сильно выделяющиеся на общем фоне, заставляют нас реагировать. Так происходит из-за нашей природы, мы так приучены действовать, иначе бы мы просто не выжили. Внутренние …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @andSTBL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Сколько времени вы можете работать НЕ ОТВЛЕКАЯСЬ над сложной задачей?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Выбери Главный Барьер (можно выбрать несколько)
The shares total 254%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Ранее мы говорили о балансе работы и отдыха. Хочу спросить, в чем для вас основная проблема в соблюдении этого баланса? Можно выбрать несколько ответов.
The shares total 203%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 January 2024 to 14 August 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,413,602 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Действуй → Достигай → Отдыхай : Цикл бесконечного развития” (@andSTBL), 744 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/andSTBL.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.