Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

хибу андервотер

@anchibubu

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

72subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002746903340
TypeChannel
Username@anchibubu
DescriptionУ меня нету рефа маскота, но вобщем, она СИРЕНА, не русалочка ) # Круглосуточные серенады
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/anchibubu

Growth

726 August 2026 — 72 subscribers9 August 2026 — 72 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 71–73 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 22:4572no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:3572first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
85.9%
avg views ÷ 72 subscribers
Avg views / post
61.9
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
27.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held9 (14 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total495
Reactions total138
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 22:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
371
Videos
9
Links
14

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

160 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54539121357572298803421.3%
custom 54561324362807662743421.3%
custom 54564228705592598252918.1%
custom 54564125068031742232515.6%
custom 5454349505161885261148.75%
custom 5206259734444807393106.25%
custom 519091333955480239095.63%
custom 526970393477934295153.13%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 160reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 20:15 UTC29 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

раз в месяцек захожу сюда. Создала тут всех осов из вселенной с музыкантами (на самом деле только одного не хватало), одежду новую нарисовала, лица.. В общем, хорошко

custom 54543495051618852617custom 54564125068031742234custom 54561324362807662743

5 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTC30 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Мы с подругой думали о том, как бы лохи и её перс, Лигуш, который в моей вселенной является их другом, относились к алине. напридумывали эдвард прагматист и позер. но в этом и шарм

custom 545613243628076627412custom 54564125068031742234custom 51909133395548023903custom 54564228705592598251

31 Jul 2026, 16:13 UTC55 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Какого фига уже 4 бота подписывается на канал, никогда столько их не было. И у них у всех на аве машины. Btw, я не дома, s0 скетчи

custom 54564125068031742239custom 54561324362807662744custom 54539121357572298801custom 54543495051618852611

29 Jul 2026, 10:32 UTC51 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Вы знали, что ему на концертах а качестве подарка фанатки кидают нижнее бельё¿ Вы тоже можете кинуть реакцией.. Он буде рад ⚡.. белью

custom 54539121357572298807custom 54561324362807662747custom 54543495051618852613

26 Jul 2026, 13:16 UTC79 views25 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🎼🎸 NME — New Musical Express No More Excuses О, это ж сам Гарри Галлахер!! В смысле, кто¿... Это же мой ОС! Знакомьтесь. Любимый персонаж журналистов, чьи громкие высказывания часто делают заголовками журналов, а его самоуверенное поведение — поводом к обсуждению.

custom 545391213575722988014custom 54564228705592598254custom 52697039347793429513custom 52062597344448073932custom 51909133395548023901custom 54564125068031742231

19 Jul 2026, 09:10 UTC90 views23 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ждите, я рисую кое-что, ох🖇️

custom 545642287055925982510custom 52062597344448073937custom 51909133395548023904custom 54539121357572298801custom 54561324362807662741

17 Jul 2026, 18:59 UTC83 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Никто с таким милым тоном никогда не говорил мне, что буде дррочить на мой арт 🖇️ берём пример, я чур первая. .

custom 545391213575722988010custom 54564228705592598253custom 54561324362807662742

17 Jul 2026, 09:33 UTC78 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Oh, fuck, не выигралось⚡ Well, it happens .. 😶

custom 54564125068031742236custom 52697039347793429512custom 51909133395548023901

14 Jul 2026, 10:02 UTC230 views22 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩буль буль буль 🤩🤩 🌟 #PortfolioDay

custom 545642287055925982511custom 54561324362807662745custom 54543495051618852613custom 52062597344448073931custom 54539121357572298801custom 54564125068031742231

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @anchibubu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,042,609 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“хибу андервотер” (@anchibubu), 72 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anchibubu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.