Channel
@ancgracia
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
203subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001143547415 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ancgracia |
| Description | El canal de difusió oficial de l'ANC de Gràcia Canal asíncron i unidireccional per difondre informació sobre les accions-activitats de l’Assemblea, difondre informació rellevant i material propi o aliè en relació amb els nostres objectius fundacionals. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2016 and 31 March 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ancgracia |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:19 | 203 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:11 | 203 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (21 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,325 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
📣 Aquest estiu i abans de l'11-S, col·loquem l'estelada al balcó, de vacances o a casa 💪🏼Aquest any, com sempre, la gent de l'Assemblea HI SOM‼️ 🫵🏼Digues tu també: HI SOC‼️ ✊🏼Posa la teva estelada 👍🏼Vine als actes de l'11S
Photo, posted without a caption
⬛️⬜️ CONCENTRACIÓ DE SUPORT A ISAAC PADRÓS Després de la humiliació i denúncia de la policia a l'Isaac per negar-se a parlar en castellà, cal una resposta clara. 📅Dimarts 11 🕥10:30 📍Carrer Major, 136 - La Jonquera Avui és l'Isaac, demà pots ser tu. HI SOC. HI SOM
⬛️⬜️✍️ L’Assemblea denuncia l’intent de l’Associació Germano-Catalana de censurar un col·loqui sobre l’autodeterminació de Catalunya Celebrem que el Col·loqui pugui tirar endavant. Tot i això, som davant d’un atac a la defensa legítima del dret a l’autodeterminació de Catalunya i a la llibertat d’expressió dels ponents, i cal denunciar-ho. 🔗https://assemblea.cat/lanc-denuncia-lintent-de-lassociacio-germano-catalana…
📢 Dilluns 27 de juliol a la plaça de la Vila de Gràcia recollim les reivindicacions de 🛫 la Plataforma @zeroportbcn 👎🏼 l'ANC de Gràcia, exclosa per 2on any de participar a la Festa Major ☝🏼La propera concentració serà el 31 d'agost 📽 Ho veureu aquí ▶️ https://youtu.be/utKHUarw1og
Photo, posted without a caption
👎🏼 El Districte de Gràcia que NO ens dona permís per fer els nostres actes en un espai propi 👍🏼 SÍ permet activitats a 4 espais alternatius a la Fundació Festa Major: La Torna, Tres Lliris, Plaça Raspall i Jonh Lennon ✊🏼Hem demanat i volem el mateix‼️ https://www.independent.cat/noticia/159498/lantifeixisme-i-la-defensa-del-catala-marquen-els-espais-de-festa-alternatius?&utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social-media&u…
🚫 El Districte de Gràcia NO ha donat permís per fer les nostres activitats a la Festa Major, els darrers dos anys 👍🏼Hi hem participat durant anys i volem seguir fent-ho 🗣 Vam explicar la situació a la concentració setmanal de la plataforma Gracia Llibertat 📣 Aquí ho trobareu
🌉 PONTS PER LA INDEPENDÈNCIA 🚗 Comença l'operació sortida, i serà una gran oportunitat per omplir d'estelades els ponts de les grans autopistes! 📅 Divendres 31 de juliol i dissabte 1 d'agost. Contacta amb la teva assemblea territorial!
L'Assemblea s'uneix al comunicat de La Directa i Irídia arran de les investigacions sobre els policies infiltrats en l'independentisme i els moviments socials. Sancionar La Directa per la investigació sobre les infiltracions policials crea un precedent perillosíssim per a la llibertat periodística i d'informació. Davant d'un estat que continua sense depurar responsabilitats i encobrint els agents infiltrats, la ind…
☝🏼Dilluns us explicarem com han anat les coses d'aquesta exclusió nostre de la Festa Major 👍🏼 Hi hem participat amb diversos actes des de 2012 👎🏼però els darrers 2 anys no hem pogut disposar d'un espai per fer-los ✖️ El Districte no ens ha autoritzat la nostra sol.licitud
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ancgracia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 660,250 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ancgracia named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ANC Gràcia” (@ancgracia), 203 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ancgracia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.