Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Александр Бирюков. Возрождаем семью

@anbiryukov

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,532subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001247156866
TypeChannel
Username@anbiryukov
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/anbiryukov

Growth

2,5322,5332,532.57 August 2026 — 2,532 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,532 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,533 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,532 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,532–2,533 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 15:382,532-1
10 Aug 2026, 11:412,533+1
7 Aug 2026, 10:012,532no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:542,532first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.9%
avg views ÷ 2,532 subscribers
Avg views / post
528
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held20 (25 July 20261 August 2026)
Views total10,567
Reactions total322
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

322 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍16250.3%
🔥5517.1%
💯4514.0%
😁257.76%
247.45%
👏61.86%
😢30.932%
😱10.311%
🤔10.311%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 322reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC430 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

«Чем плохи случайные связи? Разве плохо, когда мужчина то и дело меняет женщин?». Далее ссылаются на половой инстинкт, «признаки альфача» и прочие подобные аргументы. Если мы говорим о диком человеческом стаде времён палеолита, то спору нет, всё нормально. Особи живут чисто по биологическим законам, всецело руководствуясь инстинктами. Никаких регуляторов нет, они и не нужны. Захотел спариться — тут же спарился, захо

👍85

31 Jul 2026, 15:03 UTC524 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мужчины 30+ более пользуются большим успехом у женщин, чем молодняк. По своему опыту могу сказать, что в 30+ я гораздо более интересен женщинам, чем в 18. Нет, в 18 тоже было всё норм, но это было именно норм, то есть удовлетворительно. Сейчас же имею широкую возможность для выбора. Причём если в 18-20 я был ограничен только прослойкой ровесниц, то сейчас спектр расширился, с 18-20-летнего возраста и старше, вплоть д

👍121

31 Jul 2026, 07:05 UTC512 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍15💯10🔥4😁2

30 Jul 2026, 11:03 UTC542 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Почему с возрастом мужчины (до определённой поры, конечно) повышается женский интерес к нему? А всё из-за тех достоинств, которые мы уже перечислили. Причём понимают это не только 27-летние дамы, но и 19-летние, нацеленные на семью. Они видят, что ровесники ещё дети, попросту зелёное пацаньё с чисто подростковыми интересами. К тому же находящиеся под властью мамки и не имеющие никакой материальной базы для семьи. Я у

👍15

30 Jul 2026, 07:02 UTC500 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ТОТ САМЫЙ ИНФАНТИЗИЗМ. Почему женщины несчастны в отношениях Почему женщины, которые совершенно свободны в своём выборе и могут выбрать кого угодно, чаще всего выбирают придурков? Сегодня увидел в одной кафешке вот такую надпись: "В наших котлетках столько любви, что их можно дарить девушке вместо Рафаэлло". Авторы, видимо, хотели мило пошутить, а получилось так, что он подняли очень серьёзную тему. Большинство с

👍9

29 Jul 2026, 22:46 UTC431 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @DonskoiDmitriVideo

ПОЧЕМУ В БУРУНДИ РАСТЁТ НАСЕЛЕНИЕ, А НА ЗАПАДЕ ВЫМИРАЮТ? Взял себе по хозяйству поработать 35 летнего парня из Бурундии для меня он представляет помимо, что он работает мощно, но и как объект и представитель государства с патриархальным устройством семьи. Ну уже несколько дней изучаю патриархальную демографическую африканской республики. Меня хлебом не корми, дай на глубоком уровне поисследовать демографическу

👍207🔥5💯2

29 Jul 2026, 15:03 UTC455 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

«Как быть, если женщина не понимает слов? Она совершенно невменяемая, делает ужасные поступки и никого не слушает. Результаты её поведения вредят всем. Можно ли в этой ситуации научить её кулаком?». Здесь сам вопрос задан неправильно. Нужно спросить, не «надо ли бить жену?», а «зачем мне жена, которая понимает только язык кулака, а человеческой речи не понимает?». Если она скатилась до невменяемого состояния, то зач

👍13

29 Jul 2026, 07:04 UTC491 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍15🔥2😁2

28 Jul 2026, 20:05 UTC554 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Нужно ли мне заказывать и читать ваши книги, если я уже читал Новосёлова, Виталиса, .... ? Да, нужно. Мои книги написаны совсем на другие темы. Я специально писал о том, о чём ещё не было написано. нет смысла дублировать одно и то же. Книга Новосёлова - о женщинах для мужчин. У меня книги на эту тематику нет совсем. Виталис писал о "лёгких", "развлекательных" отношениях, а не о семье. 🔴"Мужчина 3.0", моя главная м

👍12

28 Jul 2026, 17:04 UTC491 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ТАТУИРОВКИ. РАЗОБЛАЧАЕМ МИФЫ. Вторая часть видео о татуировках Новое видео ВК https://vkvideo.ru/video-64581682_456240166 Друзья, в связи с недружественными действиями ВК по отношению к моим киноразборам я решил выкладывать новые видео так: - Раньше всего видео будут выходить на Ютубе. Так что если хочешь раньше - подписывайся на мой Ютуб. - А в ВК - на 3 дня позже. Ибо нефиг. Что случилось с ВК - обсуждали здесь

👍6

28 Jul 2026, 14:37 UTC513 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я ЗАВИДУЮ МУЖУ. Как женщины борются с успешностью мужа Новая статья "Умру, но сломаю мужа!" "Муж обязан быть лузером!" Как женщины не выносят успешных мужчин. Матриархальные женщины предпочитают мужчин-слабаков: неудачников, лузеров, неприкаянных. Маргиналов, пьющих, безработных. Об этом я ещё в конце 2000-х написал статью «Я женщина. Ищу слабака», а потом снял по этой статье каст. Но если матриархальная женщина вс

🔥10👍6💯3

28 Jul 2026, 11:04 UTC476 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Рептильный мозг против аленей.

😁12

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @anbiryukov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 665,963 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Александр Бирюков. Возрождаем семью” (@anbiryukov), 2,532 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anbiryukov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.