Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 41 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 554–564 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 00:18
555
-4
9 Sept 2026, 12:20
559
-1
30 Aug 2026, 22:36
560
-1
24 Aug 2026, 21:55
561
-1
16 Aug 2026, 19:05
562
-1
8 Aug 2026, 03:33
563
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:51
563
first reading
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 22 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
63 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
42
66.7%
custom 5370774720096509791
14
22.2%
🔥
7
11.1%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 8 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мы сейчас разрабатываем и тестируем новые продукты линии Balance — ухода для жирной, чувствительной кожи.
И чем глубже мы погружаемся в эту тему, тем очевиднее становится, что жирная кожа — это не всегда просто “избыток себума” и не всегда просто “акне”.
Очень часто состояния накладываются друг на друга:
кожа может быть жирной, но обезвоженной;
склонной к воспалениям и одновременно чувствительной;
с нарушенным бар…
Спасибо всем, кто участвовал в тестировании эмолента ANATOMY 💚
Для нас это было не просто тестирование продукта.
Это был важный этап: мы передали средство людям с реальной сухой, чувствительной и склонной к атопии кожей — и попросили честно рассказать, как кожа реагирует.
Не написать «хороший отзыв».
Не похвалить бренд.
А внимательно наблюдать за ощущениями: текстурой, впитыванием, комфортом, сухостью, реакцией ко…
Друзья! В честь дня защиты детей по вашим просьбам дарим промокод на скидку 15% 🏃♂️
THEFIRSTJUNE
Промокод действует только завтра 2 июня на все товары в магазине Эпохи косметики
В уходе за чувствительной кожей очищение играет важную роль.
Можно подобрать хороший крем, сыворотку, эмолент — но если каждый день очищать кожу слишком жёстко, она всё равно будет отвечать сухостью, стянутостью и раздражением.
Правильное очищение для чувствительной кожи должно:
— мягко удалять загрязнения — не оставлять ощущения “до скрипа” — не усиливать сухость после душа — не провоцировать зуд и покраснение — ос…
The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @anatomy_cosmetic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 8 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐀𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐎𝐌𝐘” (@anatomy_cosmetic), 555 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anatomy_cosmetic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
