Channel
@anastasiya_link
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
187subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001339700761 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @anastasiya_link |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/anastasiya_link |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 187 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 188 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:38 | 189 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:00 | 191 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 191 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
42 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 18 | 42.9% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 40.5% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 7.14% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 4.76% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Совершенно неожиданно для меня . Я начала писать роман . Придумала это вчера. Начала сегодня . Дома нет еды, пыль лежит, а я пишу . Это вымышленная история про женщину. Я в самом начале. Общий сюжет мне виден. Писать оказывается не так легко. Злюсь на скудный словарный запас и не литературность слога . Все, что сегодня написала gpt разнес в пух и прах, как мой редактор , но все же оставил надежду. (Он конечно ещё…
❤7🔥3
Video message, posted without a caption
ТЕСТ «МЕШАЕТ ЛИ МНЕ СТЫД РАСТИ?» Инструкция: Оцени каждое утверждение: 0 — не про меня 1 — иногда 2 — часто 3 — очень сильно 1. Стыд проявленности «Мне нельзя быть увиденным» □ Мне хочется проявляться, но в момент действия я начинаю сомневаться и откладывать. □ Я боюсь критики больше, чем хочу получить результат. □ Мне проще оставаться «за кадром», чем заявлять о себе. □ Когда на меня обращают внимание, я чувствую …
❤2🔥1
Сегодня в сторис , после мероприятия всплыла тема стыда ♥️ Стыд- это моя тема Она будоражит меня и создает оцепенение. Как не странно, в своих клиентах я тоже вижу актуальность этой темы… Стыд сам по себе не проблема, он помогает встроиться в социум взрослеющей личности ♥️ Но иногда личность растет , но не взрослеет и один из стопоров - СТЫД. Невзрачный, тихий и токсичный ☢️ Который удерживает от роста, видимост…
Маленькая история. Моя клиентка недавно спросила у меня смогу ли я поработать с ее сестрой, у которой не простой период в жизни. Поддержать ее, подобрать слова. Она очень за нее переживает и хочет помочь родному человеку . Я всегда за то, чтобы откликаться , но мы не можем причинить добро без запроса . Пойти к психологу, по рекомендации, без рекомендации - сложно и страшно, в первый раз всем. И этот импульс, это р…
❤3😍1
ПЕРЕХОДЫ 🤍 За последние 2 недели я проводила трансформационную игру «Переходы» трижды: дважды офлайн и один раз онлайн. Для совершенно разных женщин — индивидуально и для двух сестер ♥️ И каждый раз это потрясающе красивый путь знакомства со своей силой и сутью. У каждой игра течет по-своему. Показывает ровно то, что важно увидеть прямо сейчас. Это терапевтичный и бережный процесс, где ты не «собираешь себя из оскол…
👍2🔥2😍2
Сынуля вернулся из лагеря ♥️ Я ему купила перед поездкой кучу новеньких и классных вещей, он привез мне то, что привез 🙈 Но гордо сказал, что трусики и носки сам себе мыл 🤣 Ну в общем-то по стоячим носкам сразу видно- их действительно мыли 🤣🤣🤣 Но вопрос знатокам: КАК ОТСТИРАТЬ МАСЛЯННУЮ КРАСКУ ОТ ХЛОПКОВОЙ ОДЕЖДЫ? Принимаются все годные советы 😄
🔥5🤣2
Live stream finished (1 minute)
Live stream started
ПРАКТИКА РОСТА И РАСШИРЕНИЯ
🔥2
Про рост, масштаб и зажатое тело
🔥2
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @anastasiya_link. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
КАКОЙ СТОП-КРАН ТЕБЯ СДЕРЖИВАЕТ?
The shares total 139%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Чувствуй с Анастасией Слинкиной🤍” (@anastasiya_link), 187 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anastasiya_link.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.