Channel
@anamikus
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
910subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002344822916 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @anamikus |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/anamikus |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:50 | 910 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:05 | 912 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (22 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,970 |
| Reactions total | 534 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
534 reactions across 11 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5375526929610858088 | 95 | 17.8% | |
| custom 5411273160731435421 | 56 | 10.5% | |
| custom 5384087465151733524 | 55 | 10.3% | |
| custom 5440541511722772038 | 46 | 8.61% | |
| custom 5258249368670073225 | 44 | 8.24% | |
| custom 5442917217047967972 | 38 | 7.12% | |
| custom 5373150056054549123 | 25 | 4.68% | |
| custom 5411271614543215160 | 22 | 4.12% | |
| custom 5467470793459916154 | 21 | 3.93% | |
| custom 5323451078212095924 | 16 | 3.00% | |
| custom 5438578445380525414 | 16 | 3.00% | |
| custom 5375262690337907834 | 15 | 2.81% | |
| custom 5375551475348955286 | 14 | 2.62% | |
| custom 5440665786601482348 | 14 | 2.62% | |
| custom 5362096403667519164 | 10 | 1.87% | |
| custom 5298845854818409131 | 9 | 1.69% | |
| custom 5411294910445820319 | 8 | 1.50% | |
| custom 5413728176922732855 | 7 | 1.31% | |
| custom 5375402113566277518 | 6 | 1.12% | |
| custom 5373069426633499502 | 5 | 0.936% | |
| 5 further kinds | 12 | 2.25% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 534reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @anamikus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Меня очень многие просили пройти эти истории. А я всегда стараюсь прислушиваться к вашим советам и изучать что-то новое 🤩
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
custom 54385784453805254147custom 54406657866014823481
Здравствуйте! Я была бы счастлива, если бы Саша ушла, но ещё большее счастье будет, если она НЕ ВЫГОРИТ и НЕ ПЕРЕСТАНЕТ ПИСАТЬ. Потому что, честно, я даже представить не могу, в каком эмоциональном состоянии надо находиться, чтобы писать сн3… Мне кажется, это такое кладбище утраченных ресурсов и вдохновения… Будем надеяться, что у неё есть уже свои идеи и после окончания сн3 мы их увидим… Честно, я бы хотела видеть …
custom 544054151172277203846custom 544066578660148234813custom 54385784453805254149custom 54381920615326467202
А можно уже вместо крутых прогревов, скандалов, голых карточек, ответов в тгк и интервью будет просто интересная, качественно отрисованная история? Или сейчас это никому неинтересно? Можно как-то, чтобы «маркетинг» был пропорционален качеству истории? Сейчас все хейтят Маришку, как хейтили Сашу снр, а потом, если она напишет годную историю, все будут её на руках носить — это база. Выйдет ли у неё также? Никто не зна…
custom 525824936867007322544custom 532345107821209592416custom 536209640366751916410custom 52850143722031428503custom 54652175677170939401
Из старых точно предложу «Легенду Ивы» — для меня это до сих пор лучшее в вн. Можно еще «ПСИ» и первый сезон «Теодоры» Из новых можно «Бездушную», но с оглаской, что сюжет пошел по косой линии, но ветки там очень хорошие. И «код синий» очень даже приятный. Стоит говорить про снр? И не про его финал. А про 1-2 сезоны. Мб скучно и банально, но как-то так🚨
custom 538408746515173352449custom 544291721704796797210custom 54112652408117406275custom 54112731607314354211
Вы просили в анонимке отзыв на новинку кр. Сейчас будет моя самая короткая рецензия за все время: Пыталась читать рожденную солнцем. Не дочитала. Скучно. Простите, на этом мои полномочия все…💋
custom 541127316073143542146custom 52988458548184091319custom 54112949104458203195
Для меня одна из самых трагичных судеб в «Бесстыжих» — это судьба Мэнди. Моя любимая девочка, мой самый любимый женский персонаж. Я за неё готова убить так же, как она убила за Липа. Вы не представляете, насколько реалистично и точно подан портрет таких людей, как она. Самое ужасное и обидное, невыносимое — то, что она сбежала за лучшей жизнью, как и Фиона, но не нашла её. Она хотела выбраться из гетто. И выбралась…
custom 544291721704796797224custom 54112731607314354219custom 54112949104458203193custom 53840874651517335242
Причем самое интересное то, что Дециан имеет много достоевщины, но я не могу назвать его персонажем Ф.М.Достоевского во всей плоти. Вот такой вот необычный парадокс. Анну могу: Анна — это симбиоз Раскольникова, Катерины и Ивана Карамазова. Борис — Ставрогин для меня чистой воды (эстетически) с примесью Верховенского (духовно). Каин имеет нотки Рогожина в плане обсессии и страсти. А вот Дмитрий и Генри, как и Дециан…
custom 541127161454321516021custom 53730694266334995025custom 53754021135662775185custom 53840874651517335243
🤩достоевщина дециана соррета: человек идеи или идея человека🤩 как можно понять из заголовка, речь сегодня пойдёт о фаворите визуальной новеллы «в объятиях тьмы», дециане соррете. перво-наперво хочу предупредить, что все выводы — это моя интерпретация и попытка раскрыть всё то, что я вижу и чувствую, наблюдая за развитием арки данного персонажа. с огромным трепетом отношусь к подходу, которого придерживается сценари…
custom 537555147534895528614custom 53754021135662775181custom 53840874651517335241custom 54112716145432151601
Рекомендую ознакомиться с колоссальным трудом, которая проделала Верона, чтобы разобрать Дециана из «В объятиях тьмы». Это прекрасное, глубокое, вдумчивое, объемное эссе. Не торопитесь прочитать и понять его сразу, дайте время, чтобы настояться мыслям. Разделите чтение по главам. Бесконечно рада, что послужила вдохновением для этой статьи, но, думаю, Верона многое нащупала и создала сама, от меня лишь взят чужой т…
custom 537552692961085808822custom 54137281769227328557custom 54429172170479679724
Не знаю, почему решила поделиться с вами этим, но сегодня я писала письмо в тюрьму. Я не могу назвать эту девочку другом — для меня это слишком личное, но, думаю, она могла бы им стать спустя время. «Хорошая знакомая» — мы постоянно сталкивались, но общаться повода не было. Сейчас я жалею, что не успела сходить с ней в кино на «обсессию» или пофотографироваться. Она вот стригла меня неделю назад, а теперь так. Я бы…
custom 537552692961085808868custom 546747079345991615418custom 537526269033790783414
Ещё одно доказательство того, что канон для Мейо — не убивать отца, ведь тогда он пойдет по стопам матери чьи предки решали дело словом, а не орудием. А убив отца, он станет подобным ему — таким же жестоким, готовым идти по головам. Годы пройдут, а подлость поступков на душе останется, превратив его в циничного эгоистичного собственника-монстра. Автарх тоже убил своего названного отца (больше инфы нет), посмотрим, к…
custom 537315005605454912325custom 53755269296108580885custom 54674707934599161543custom 53752626903379078341custom 53842573912378295291
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @anamikus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Меня очень многие просили пройти эти истории. А я всегда стараюсь прислушиваться к вашим советам и изучать что-то новое 🤩
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 928,674 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“✞.𝐀𝐍Á𝐌𝐈𝐊𝐔𝐒.✞” (@anamikus), 910 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anamikus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.