Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Analyzing 🧠

@analyzer_di

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

112subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002016083812
TypeChannel
Username@analyzer_di
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/analyzer_di

Growth

11210 Aug 2026, 04:30 — 112 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 07:20 — 112 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 04:3010 Aug 2026, 07:20
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 111–113 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 07:20112no change
10 Aug 2026, 04:30112first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.7%
avg views ÷ 112 subscribers
Avg views / post
37.8
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (10 June 202531 July 2026)
Views total302
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 04:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
15s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

29 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1551.7%
👍1034.5%
💔310.3%
🥴13.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2025 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 07:29 UTC27 viewsread 10 August 2026

تورم اقتصادی نه به دلیل دشمنی با یک کشور خاص بلکه ناشی از مدل اقتصادی ایجاد شده توسط حکومت می‌باشد. تصور کنید اگر تا یک ساعت دیگر آمریکا تمامی تحریم‌ها را بردارد و پول‌‌های بلوکه شده جمهوری اسلامی را آزاد کند مجددا بعد از ۵ سال تورم اقتصادی حتی با شدت بیشتری بازمیگردد.

Signed Mahmoud Rezaei

31 Jul 2026, 07:22 UTC29 viewsread 10 August 2026

اما اگر تورم اقتصادی نه یکسال ، نه دو سال، بلکه ۱۷ سال! طول بکشد ، دیگر یک اتفاق یا حادثه نیست بلکه یک قاعده است و جزو لاینفک مدل اقتصادی آن جامعه می‌شود.

Signed Mahmoud Rezaei

31 Jul 2026, 07:17 UTC27 viewsread 10 August 2026

آیا تورم یا به طور کلی بحران اقتصادی یک حادثه است ؟ تقریبا در همه کشورها این احتمال وجود دارد که تورم و مشکلات اقتصادی بوجود بیاید. در حد ۶ ماه حتی یکسال ممکن است افزایش قیمت، کمبود کالا و افزایش نقدینگی اتفاق رخ دهد سپس دولت آن کشور این بحران را مهار می‌کند و از مردم به خاطر شرایط پیش آمده عذرخواهی می‌کند.

Signed Mahmoud Rezaei

30 Jul 2026, 16:41 UTC32 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

یکی از نشانه‌های سقوط یک حکومت دیکتاتوری این است که دیگر مردم فریب بازی‌هایش را نمی‌خورند. برای مثال مرز بین هنرمند حکومتی و مردمی آنقدر پر رنگ میشود که تمامی مردم جامعه با هر سطح سوادی قادر به تمایز این دو از هم می‌باشند. دست حکومت در پروژه‌ صادر کردن پرستوهایش به خارج از کشور رو میشود و مردم با یک نگاه می‌توانند پرستوهای حکومتی را تشخیص دهند . به عبارتی بهتر حنای نظام دیگر برای مردم رنگی ندارد .

👍2

Signed Mahmoud Rezaei

28 Jul 2026, 08:23 UTC51 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

به خاطر داشته باشیم ، حکم اعدامی که نتیجه اعتراض به وضع وخیم یک کشور است با اعدام به دلایل جنایی (که از نظر اخلاقی ناپسندیده است ) کاملا متفاوت می‌باشد. زمانیکه مردم جامعه به دلیل وضع وخیم یک کشور دست به تخریب و حتی قتل میزنند، دیگر یک عمل فردی که میبایست برای آن حکم قضایی صادر شود تلقی نمیشود بلکه در دسته خیزش های جمعی قرار میگیرد و با صدور حکم حتی اعدام سرکوب نخواهد شد.

👍2

Signed Mahmoud Rezaei

28 Jul 2026, 08:13 UTC45 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

دلیل اعدام هر چیزی هم که باشد باز هم یک واقعیت مهم را باطل نمیکند... این واقعیت که زمانی که دستگاه قضایی یک حکومت به هر علتی تعدد اجرای حکم اعدامی هایش افزایش پیدا کند، یک نشانه قوی از ناکارآمدی و نالایقی آن حکومت می‌باشد.

💔2

Signed Mahmoud Rezaei

28 Jul 2026, 08:05 UTC47 viewsread 10 August 2026

ابوالفضل سپاهی و امیرحسین صفری از اعتراض کنندگان ۱۸/۱۹ دیماه بودند.

Signed Mahmoud Rezaei

28 Jul 2026, 08:05 UTC44 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🔴خبرگزاری میزان اعلام کرد که حکم اعدام ابوالفضل سپاهی و امیرحسین صفری اجرا شد.

💔1

Signed Mahmoud Rezaei

1 Sept 2025, 16:03 UTC242 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

اینو نمیشد تو اینستا گذاشت فقط برای اعضای کانال

3

Signed Mahmoud Rezaei

1 Sept 2025, 16:03 UTC218 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

@bass_musics2 ------------ Downloads : 7.28K (7,283) Date : 1403/10/03-14:45

4

Signed Mahmoud Rezaei

26 Aug 2025, 20:12 UTC247 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

شباهت زیادی بین یک شخص و یک جامعه میشه پیدا کرد ‌. حتی گاهی اوقات میشه جامعه رو به یک شخص تشبیه کرد که هر فرد اون جامعه بخشی از شخصیت اون انسانه . جامعه هم مثل یک انسان بیماری میگیره ، فقیر میشه ، فاسد میشه ، موفق میشه و گاهی اوقات هم به فروپاشی میرسه . برای مثال جامعه ما در ظاهر مدام وانمود می‌کنه همه چیز خوبه اما از درون در حال فروپاشی روانی و هویتی قرار داره . 📝 کپشن این محتوا تحلیل‌های شخص خودم به عنوان یک روانش

👍21

Signed Mahmoud Rezaei

26 Aug 2025, 20:11 UTC205 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

اولین قدم در درمان اینه که شخص قبول کنه بیماره . تا وقتی بر این عقیده باشه که همه چیز روبراهه هیچ تغییری نخواهد کرد و حتی وضعش وخیم‌تر هم خواهد شد. اولین قدم برای تغییر هر کشور اینه که قبول کنه وضعش وخیمه ‌. تا وقتی در رسانه خودش بر این عقیده باشه همه چیز گل و بلبله هیچ تغییری نخواهد کرد و وضعش حتی وخیم‌تر خواهد شد . Mahmoudrezaei.psy @analyzer_di

1👍1

Signed Mahmoud Rezaei

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @analyzer_di. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 889,956 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Analyzing 🧠” (@analyzer_di), 112 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/analyzer_di.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.