Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for aNggell.exxe0

Channel

aNggell.exxe0

@anGell_exee1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

104subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002226636953
TypeChannel
Username@anGell_exee1
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/anGell_exee1

Growth

104107105.57 August 2026 — 107 subscribers9 August 2026 — 107 subscribers15 August 2026 — 104 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 104–107 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 04:08104-3
9 Aug 2026, 08:30107no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:16107first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 15 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
113.3%
avg views ÷ 104 subscribers
Avg views / post
118
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held16 (15 May 20265 August 2026)
Views total589
Reactions total57
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 07s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

220 reactions across 14 posts, in 63 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 5.91% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5355100279899448454135.91%
custom 5264966422643116996125.45%
custom 5348569404168760937115.00%
115.00%
🍓104.55%
custom 523576066650514424894.09%
🕊94.09%
custom 526486376433480787173.18%
custom 526525373448038385773.18%
custom 526480774937133273962.73%
custom 526484268463530549862.73%
custom 534587919127336816362.73%
custom 538230564642936956462.73%
custom 526522951515980102152.27%
custom 595869244369090044352.27%
🍾52.27%
custom 519316999697652412541.82%
custom 532360546510651173841.82%
custom 532825488746349424541.82%
custom 534581901019160854041.82%
43 further kinds7634.5%

Custom emoji. 16 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 220reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 16 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @anGell_exee1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 May 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 21:39 UTC54 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

⭐⭐ ⭐⭐

🕊3🦄3custom 53551002798994484543custom 53552895676981191102custom 52357606665051442481custom 52648426846353054981custom 52717739930519117871custom 53485694041687609371

Signed 〜(ゝ。∂)

29 Jul 2026, 19:56 UTC114 views34 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

🐈‍⬛

custom 535510027989944845410🕊5custom 52648426846353054984custom 53485694041687609374custom 52357606665051442482custom 52717739930519117872custom 53550121042208612972custom 53552895676981191102

Signed 〜(ゝ。∂)

27 Jul 2026, 16:37 UTC105 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

1

Signed 〜(ゝ。∂)

22 Jul 2026, 19:15 UTC136 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @F1julia

В нашем мире чтобы стать популярным надо показать сиськи детям на улице? Позор Я хотя бы в торче ходила но вреда никому не делала, ну и ебалом хотя бы вышла, и то я больной человек мне можно

3

Signed 〜(ゝ。∂)

19 Jul 2026, 17:39 UTC180 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

3

Signed 〜(ゝ。∂)

15 Jul 2026, 19:13 UTC201 views24 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩

custom 52357606665051442486custom 53485694041687609376custom 52652295151598010215custom 52649659845564500562🍌1🍓1🍾1custom 52648426846353054981

Signed 〜(ゝ。∂)

8 Jul 2026, 02:49 UTC272 views26 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩

custom 52649664226431169967custom 52648637643348078715custom 59586924436909004435💘2custom 52647672220599244192custom 52652537344803838572🍓1custom 59586774671399393051

Signed 〜(ゝ。∂)

4 Jul 2026, 18:26 UTC253 views24 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🍓7custom 534587919127336816364custom 52471382496206179262custom 53282242385768880582custom 52471344399846274141custom 52987134667464711351custom 53910512607009512111

Signed анфхЕлинп Манкрафт::/

2 Jul 2026, 18:48 UTC246 viewsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

Signed анфхЕлинп Манкрафт::/

26 Jun 2026, 22:35 UTC297 views21 reactions6 Starsread 9 August 2026
Video

🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸

custom 52648077493713327396custom 52649664226431169965custom 52652537344803838575custom 52604738997363881052custom 52044066106753819201custom 52062705234026296941custom 52649567031321249861

Signed ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴

11 Jun 2026, 02:20 UTC384 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🐳2custom 52648637643348078712custom 52649567031321249862🕊1🦄1custom 52648129591666635871

Signed angEl3.exe

10 Jun 2026, 21:34 UTC362 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

😭😭

custom 53823056464293695646custom 53458190101916085404🍾2custom 53010083837368278352custom 53417122655423937422custom 53008223171636313031custom 53008895806464526821custom 53011424468460030751

Signed angEl3.exe

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @anGell_exee1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“aNggell.exxe0” (@anGell_exee1), 104 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anGell_exee1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.