Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Юля Финесс

Channel

Юля Финесс

@F1julia

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

121,731subscribers

-213 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002872881094
TypeChannel
Username@F1julia
DescriptionОфициальный канал Юлии Финесс LIVE канал: @f1jullia Мой ВПН: @FinessVPN_bot Реклама и сотрудничество: @FINESSPRBOT @reklama_nikita Контент носит развлекательный характер. Всё в рамках законодательства РФ.
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held36
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/F1julia

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

119,966122,006120,9866 August 2026 — 121,944 subscribers6 August 2026 — 121,944 subscribers6 August 2026 — 121,971 subscribers7 August 2026 — 121,875 subscribers8 August 2026 — 121,619 subscribers9 August 2026 — 121,679 subscribers10 August 2026 — 121,965 subscribers11 August 2026 — 121,943 subscribers12 August 2026 — 122,006 subscribers13 August 2026 — 121,884 subscribers14 August 2026 — 121,887 subscribers16 August 2026 — 121,767 subscribers17 August 2026 — 121,721 subscribers18 August 2026 — 121,515 subscribers19 August 2026 — 121,422 subscribers20 August 2026 — 121,403 subscribers21 August 2026 — 121,118 subscribers23 August 2026 — 121,127 subscribers24 August 2026 — 121,118 subscribers25 August 2026 — 121,201 subscribers26 August 2026 — 121,102 subscribers27 August 2026 — 121,188 subscribers28 August 2026 — 121,221 subscribers29 August 2026 — 121,059 subscribers30 August 2026 — 120,889 subscribers31 August 2026 — 120,739 subscribers2 September 2026 — 120,613 subscribers3 September 2026 — 120,580 subscribers5 September 2026 — 120,196 subscribers8 September 2026 — 119,966 subscribers11 September 2026 — 119,971 subscribers13 September 2026 — 120,294 subscribers14 September 2026 — 120,994 subscribers16 September 2026 — 121,389 subscribers18 September 2026 — 121,766 subscribers25 September 2026 — 121,731 subscribers121,7316 August 202625 September 2026
36 measurements spanning 50 days, net -213. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 119,660–122,312 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 06:02121,731-35
18 Sept 2026, 21:35121,766+377
16 Sept 2026, 13:59121,389+395
14 Sept 2026, 16:37120,994+700
13 Sept 2026, 02:37120,294+323
11 Sept 2026, 04:38119,971+5
8 Sept 2026, 09:17119,966-230
5 Sept 2026, 04:16120,196-384
3 Sept 2026, 06:14120,580-33
2 Sept 2026, 02:03120,613-126
31 Aug 2026, 23:47120,739-150
30 Aug 2026, 23:13120,889-170
29 Aug 2026, 20:24121,059-162
28 Aug 2026, 20:52121,221+33
27 Aug 2026, 20:17121,188+86
26 Aug 2026, 23:43121,102-99
25 Aug 2026, 22:16121,201+83
24 Aug 2026, 19:36121,118-9
23 Aug 2026, 06:09121,127+9
21 Aug 2026, 19:17121,118first reading

Engagement

77 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 114 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.3%
avg views ÷ 121,731 subscribers
Avg views / post
55,100
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 77 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held77 (23 July 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total1,322,300
Reactions total18,457
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 13:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,530
Videos
≈447
Links
≈185

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
35s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

59,557 reactions across 74 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 537532868680536235359,557100.0%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 74 of the 77 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59,557 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 77 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
712
across the posts below
Posts paid on
65
of 74 we hold a reading for · 88%
Most on one post
77
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @F1julia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 77 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Sept 2026, 11:22 UTC≈7,200 views51 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

🔥MPL BTC — НОВОЕ ИМЯ. СТАРЫЕ ПРАВИЛА. Кто давно за мной следит, знает: крипту я меняла в BTC MONOPOLY. Но после истории с авторскими правами ребятам пришлось сменить название. 🚀Теперь они — MPL BTC. Поменялось только имя и логотип. Команда, скорость и уровень сервиса остались на месте. Обмен занимает 2–3 минуты, крипта прилетает на нужную платформу, а комиссия сейчас снижена до исторического минимума. 💰 Так что е…

custom 537532868680536235351

23 Sept 2026, 15:44 UTC≈24,700 views1,390 reactions8 Starsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Девочки, мы как новый айфон, не всегда есть что то новое, но за то какое дорогое и ахуенное

custom 53753286868053623531,390

21 Sept 2026, 19:50 UTC≈31,300 views446 reactions4 Starsread 27 September 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 5375328686805362353446

21 Sept 2026, 19:45 UTC≈30,200 views483 reactions1 Starread 27 September 2026

Скоро выйду с новостями❤️

custom 5375328686805362353483

21 Sept 2026, 19:45 UTC≈30,400 views215 reactions1 Starread 27 September 2026

Лисеи в течении следующих суток раздам приветы всем кто подключится к моему ВПН Те, кто уже подключен, тоже рандомно выберу и раздам https://t.me/FinessVPN_bot?start=Finess

custom 5375328686805362353215

17 Sept 2026, 17:45 UTC≈46,000 views819 reactions34 Starsread 27 September 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

custom 5375328686805362353819

17 Sept 2026, 17:45 UTC≈51,800 views582 reactions22 Starsread 27 September 2026

почему ты такая недовольная и каналы не ведешь активно

custom 5375328686805362353582

17 Sept 2026, 17:34 UTC≈43,500 views807 reactions6 Starsread 27 September 2026

Летели облака летели далеко как папина рука как лоси на цб

custom 5375328686805362353807

13 Sept 2026, 08:40 UTC≈68,700 views1,770 reactions27 Starsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Прости моя душа за мое молодое тело

custom 53753286868053623531,770

12 Sept 2026, 20:15 UTC≈105,000 views1,380 reactions12 Starsread 27 September 2026

Любовь это так круто но такая жестьььь короче ваще

custom 53753286868053623531,380

11 Sept 2026, 08:42 UTC≈62,700 views751 reactions4 Starsread 27 September 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

custom 5375328686805362353751

Showing the 12 most recent of 77 posts we hold for @F1julia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Jul 2026, 10:34 UTCAnonymous Poll11,400 voters approx.

будешь пользоваться?

  1. да46%
  2. нет20%
  3. смотря скок раковин45%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 77 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 27 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Юля Финесс” (@F1julia), 121,731 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/F1julia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.