Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

星兒工作室❤️‍🔥(尖沙咀)💕💋

@amy12345677

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,154subscribers

+31 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002133524982
TypeChannel
Username@amy12345677
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/amy12345677

Growth

3,1223,1543,1387 August 2026 — 3,123 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,123 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,122 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,134 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,154 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 8 days, net +31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,117–3,159 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 12:353,154+20
11 Aug 2026, 18:523,134+12
8 Aug 2026, 11:083,122-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:313,123no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:303,123first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.0%
avg views ÷ 3,154 subscribers
Avg views / post
505
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.674%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held15 (30 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total7,572
Reactions total49
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4s
Average length
4s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

49 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1326.5%
👍816.3%
💘714.3%
612.2%
💯510.2%
🥰48.16%
😘36.12%
👏24.08%
🏆12.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 23:28 UTC16 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

美好星期6️⃣❤️ 今日餘、2:30-5:30位👏💕 歡迎預約諮詢🫦💥😘

6 Aug 2026, 23:53 UTC316 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

星期5️⃣❤️ 瑜珈一小時🧘‍♀️ 餘12:30、4:30-6:30位💕 👏歡迎預約諮詢🫦💥👠

2👍1🔥1🥰1

6 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC391 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

有時簡簡單單的一句滿意👍已經係對星兒最高的評價🫶 真心多謝嗮😘💕

👍1💘1💯1🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTC382 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 今個月的拉票+參與抽獎連結 可以將呢個成個轉發去你哋舖頭/頻道/工作室 入面就已經啲人會自己識投票🗳️+參加到抽獎🎟️ 可轉發入去你的店/工作室每天放出嚟(如果唔想煩就可以🔝置頂訊息,不用每天放) 等人哋見到可以投你一票+投票嘅人可以得到抽獎機會 🌟有放里個拉票嘅店舖/工作室 才會參與被抽到獎嘅30位師兄去消費 減$300練功卷(由我地平台送出)+去完嘅師兄仲會幫手出報告更加增加 曝光率+影響力

👍1💘1💯1🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTC390 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🆔 店家ID:14 🏠 店名:星兒私密工作室 🏢 #九龍區 #個人工作室 🗺️ 地點:尖沙咀 🏷️ 標籤:#尖沙咀 #紅牌大場出身👍 #天然巨乳 #真人真相 #P1 #P2 #Nuru陪浴🚿 #偽入含水蕭🫦 #波推 #放風箏🪁 #高手🤌 #冰火兩重天 #事後男潮吹👅 #口技非凡 #服務一流 #專業按摩 #前列腺推拿 #腳交女神 #獨立單位 #全新靚裝修 #私隱度高 #一次性毛巾[end] 前往龍虎榜投票活動 https://t.me/mantiger_Popularity/48368 (連結本月有效)

1👍1🔥1🥰1

5 Aug 2026, 03:26 UTC561 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

今日已full❤️ 歡迎預約星期4️⃣❤️

👍1🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 04:32 UTC692 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

今日已full❤️ 歡迎預約星期3️⃣❤️

💯1🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 23:30 UTC697 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

多謝大家對星兒的讚賞👍 嘻嘻😜

1👍1💘1💯1🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 23:27 UTC779 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

美好星期一❤️ 一小時瑜珈🧘‍♀️ 11:30後🈶位💕 歡迎預約諮詢🫦😘

🏆1💘1💯1🔥1😘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @amy12345677. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,096,612 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“星兒工作室❤️‍🔥(尖沙咀)💕💋” (@amy12345677), 3,154 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amy12345677.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.