Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

GG一樓一&樓上骨&工作室 專區

@firstfloorone

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

19,446subscribers

-194 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001726335854
TypeChannel
Username@firstfloorone
Description香港GG男人TG群組: 香港18區工作室 #一樓一 #樓上骨 #THAI #CALLG #電話預約 #中醫保健 #泰式按摩 #香港tg群組 #spa #神秘房 Telegram主板 : @GG_GGlist0 #GG 男人資訊 @GG_GGlist3 查詢 @GGHKContact1 工作室 Link https://t.me/addlist/SpcW9wxRinFmNjc1 免責聲明👇🏻 t.me/GG_GGlistMenu/491
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/firstfloorone

Growth

19,44619,64019,5437 August 2026 — 19,640 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,616 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,575 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,496 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,468 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,446 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 5 days, net -194. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,417–19,669 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 11:1419,446-22
11 Aug 2026, 10:1719,468-28
10 Aug 2026, 07:0719,496-79
9 Aug 2026, 04:1119,575-41
8 Aug 2026, 04:5619,616-24
7 Aug 2026, 12:4619,640first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 20 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.7%
avg views ÷ 19,446 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,020
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.106%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held21 (20 June 202612 August 2026)
Views total48,292
Reactions total47
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 23:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
76
Videos
15
Links
38

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
28s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

74 reactions across 18 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 97.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7297.3%
👍11.35%
👎11.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 09:49 UTC372 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔞按以下店名 就可跳去該店連結入口 🔞 🎉🎉🎉九龍區🎉🎉🎉 < 深水埗 > < Sham Shui Po > ❤️ Nikko男潮吹工作室(深水埗) ❤️ POPO工作室(深水埗) ❤️ CoCo工作室(深水埗)❤️️小曼工作室(深水埗) ❤️ May出火性手工作室(長沙灣)❤潮吹後花園口爆專家 (深水埗) ❤紫珊工作室(深水埗)❤️️夏目工作室 (深水埗) ❤️長沙灣皇牌抓龍筋❤BoBo工作室 ❤絲絲性手工作室(長沙灣) < 太子&旺角 > <Prince Edward & Mongkok> 灣 ❤️ 脈道男士養生館(太子) ❤️ 太子貴族正宗抓龍筋(太子) ❤️️ Mimi全方位龍筋前列腺保養師(太子) ❤️ 青青男仕保健工作室(旺角) ❤️ 研兒工作室(旺角) ❤️ 旺角YoYo後庭插入式前列腺按摩(旺角)❤️ 喬喬男仕保健工作室 (旺角) ❤️ 旺角陀地Yellow男私密抓龍筋 (旺角)❤婉婉

1

7 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC≈3,370 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎 🔞按以下店名 就可跳去該店連結入口 🔞 《 總目 》 🎉🎉🎉香港區🎉🎉🎉 < 灣仔 > < Wan Chai > 🪂灣灣私密工作室(灣仔) 🪂Eva抓龍筋根骶性保養(灣仔) 🪂Stella工作室(灣仔) 🪂純陀Karen Studio (灣仔) 🪂辣寶兒工作室(灣仔)🪂純陀Jessica工作室 (灣仔) 🪂短髮Tiffany抓龍筋工作室 (灣仔) 🪂陀地Summer工作室 (灣仔) 🪂依依灣仔工作室(灣仔) 🪂純陀Cherry工作室(灣仔) 🪂Angela泰式抓龍筋工作室(灣仔) 🪂瀅瀅高端私人工作室(灣仔) < 中上環 >< Central and Sheung Wan > 🪂38D波妹抓龍筋(上環)🪂coco工作室(上環) < 炮台山 > < Fortress Hill > 🪂彤彤工作室 (炮台山)🪂Wefei工作室(炮台山)

3

4 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC≈3,950 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Sweet Girl 工作室🍯🎀🧸 #尖沙咀 #工作室 #中越混血 #P1 #按摩 #P2 #Nuru 📱TG頻道號 @sweetgirlAngel868 🔗TG客服號 @Sweetsweet2026

9

31 Jul 2026, 02:41 UTC≈4,450 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🍬糖糖🍬刺激性保養工作室🍭 #旺角 #個人工作室 #P1 #按摩 #P2 #真人相 #抓龍筋 #前列腺保健 📱Tg頻道: @sweet5ddd 🔗Tg預約: @sweet5dd

7

28 Jul 2026, 09:00 UTC≈4,630 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

EMMA💛慢節奏感知工作室 #九龍 #尖沙咀 #P1 #P2 #香薰推油 #泰式拉筋 #前列腺保健 #泰式抓龍筋 #狗仔式放風箏 #高潮控制 📱 睇圖號👀 @emma24681234 🔗TG預約📲 @emma57929214

5👎1

27 Jul 2026, 06:12 UTC≈4,380 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💥瀅瀅高端私人工作室🌸 #灣仔 #個人工作室 #P1 #按摩 #P2 #推油 #樓上骨 📱TG 頻道 @Yingyingws 🔗TG預約號 @spa3216 📱 WhatsApp預約 Wa.me/+85294892952

3

27 Jul 2026, 06:12 UTC≈4,010 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🐉婉婉工作室: 正宗徒手抓龍筋 #旺角 #九龍區 #P1 #按摩 #P2 #Nuru #抓龍筋 #男潮吹 #採耳 #SM 📱TG 頻道 @showshowspa 🔗TG 客服 @showshow88

1

27 Jul 2026, 06:12 UTC≈3,870 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⭐️✨星兒私密室✨⭐️ #尖沙咀 #星兒私密室 #紅牌大場出身 #真人真相 #P1 #P2 #Nuru #調情高手 #前列腺保健 #波推 #男潮吹 #專業按摩 #腳交女神 📱TG睇圖號: @amy12345677 🔗TG預約號: @Amy001019

23 Jul 2026, 05:19 UTC≈4,630 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💋 絲絲性手工作室 #長沙灣 #個人工作室 #P1 #P2 #Nuru #大波夾腸 #抓龍筋 #經絡推油 #放風箏 #前列腺保健 #波推 #RPP 📱TG頻道 @manmanstudio 🔗TG預約 @manmancs 📱電話/WhatsApp預約 wa.me/+85292917996

3

20 Jul 2026, 05:18 UTC≈4,950 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🩷粉紅🩷大波⚽️BiBi工作室 #尖沙咀 #個人工作室 #巨乳 #P1 #按摩 #P2 #Nuru #波推 #抓龍筋 #前列腺保健 📱睇圖號 @Bibi698 🔗TG預約 @DABC321 📞電話 92911101

7

18 Jul 2026, 06:41 UTC≈5,000 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🐉BoBo工作室 #深水埗 #個人工作室 #P1 #P2 #Nuru #抓龍筋 #採耳 #刮痧 #手骨一流 📱頻道號 @bobostudio68 🔗預約號 @bobostudiocs

4

14 Jul 2026, 06:17 UTC≈4,680 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🍷 純陀Jessica工作室 (灣仔) #港島 #灣仔 #陀地 #純陀 #工作室 #P1 #P2 #香薰推油 #Nuru #宮廷採耳 #刮痧 #港式按摩 #前列腺保健 📱 TG睇圖號: @BabyMass0608 🔗 TG預約號: @BabyMassCS

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @firstfloorone. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@firstfloorone edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 318,169 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GG一樓一&樓上骨&工作室 專區” (@firstfloorone), 19,446 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/firstfloorone.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.