Channel
@amperfeen
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
219subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001242629169 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @amperfeen |
| Description | Wir sind Bewohner von Olching & Umgebung, die friedlich für die Einhaltung unserer Grundrechte demonstrieren. Wir sind unabhängig von Parteien und ohne politischen Hintergrund. Kontakt @amperfee |
| Created | 7 May 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/amperfeen |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:30 | 219 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:00 | 219 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 January 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Beginn einer Corona-Aufarbeitung in der Schweiz: Eine Podiumsdiskussion zwischen Daniel Koch (war bis Mai 2020 das Schweizer Äquivalent zu Karl Lauterbach, nur nicht so ... 🤡 ) und Pietro Vernazza (war Leiter der Abteilung Infektiologie am Kantonsspital St. Gallen) https://vimeo.com/909773558 Dazu Fee, die inzwischen in der Schweiz wohnt: Ich finde die Gesprächskultur bezeichnend für den Unterschied Deutschland-Schw…
wieder Demo in Olching! ...am 18. März 2023 Danke an die Veranstalter 🙏👍
Photo, posted without a caption
Gruß und Rückblick von Fee, ehemalige Demoveranstalterin in Olching, mit ihren Erfahrungen und Wahrnehmungen ab Frühjahr 2020
Zur Erinnerung: Angemeldeter Spaziergang heute in Fürstenfeldbruck ab 18 Uhr (sammeln 17:30 Uhr) am Volksfestplatz. Veranstaltet wird dieser von der Bürgerinitiative "FFB hält zusammen", deren Telegram-Kanal ihr hier beitreten könnt: https://t.me/FFBZM
Wir möchten euch alle zu unserem friedlichen Spaziergang in Fürstenfeldbruck einladen. Die Veranstaltung ist Angemeldet und genehmigt. WIR HABEN KEINE MASKEN AUFLAGE! Letzte Woche waren wir 1400 Menschen die friedlich in Fürstenfeldbruck für ihr Recht auf Selbstbestimmung und Entscheidungsfreiheit bei medizinischen Behandlungen protestiert haben. Jeder der letzte Woche schon dabei war is aufgefordert noch einen we…
Photo, posted without a caption
Das leiten wir gerne weiter:
Das wurde mir gerade zugeschickt: ❗❗❗ WICHTIG ❗❗❗ Grüß euch ihr lieben, einige von euch haben bestimmt schon den Zeitungsartikel in der SZ gelesen das diese Woche das erste Mal eine Versammlung unserer seits offiziell angezeigt wurde. Für diese Versammlungsanzeige bin ich verantwortlich, wir haben eine Bürgerinitiative für den Landkreis Fürstenfeldbruck gegründet "FFB hält zusammen". Ziele unserer Bürgerinitiative…
Photo, posted without a caption
die Versammlung von München steht auf heute ist wieder abgesagt: https://t.me/muenchenstehtauf/1860
Na dann machen wir es halt mal! Viele haben es gefordert. Nun tun wir es halt. Theresienwiese mit allem drum und dran. FFP2-Maskenpflicht 500er Cluster Abstände. Die Stadt meint ja wenn wir das ordentlich durchführen wäre aus ihrer Sicht wieder ein Protest genehmigungsfähig den man auch so nennen kann. Mal sehen ob sie Wort hält. Wer also dabei mitmachen mag der kann sich mit uns etwas länger als eine Stunde auf …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @amperfeen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,067,439 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@amperfeen named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Die Amperfeen” (@amperfeen), 219 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amperfeen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.