НИХУЯСЕ—
❤9

Channel
@amorphooous
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
147subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003929595666 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @amorphooous |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 9 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/amorphooous |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:32 | 147 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 147 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 9 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
647 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5445178100717489445 | 196 | 30.3% | |
| ❤ | 172 | 26.6% | |
| custom 5445402074672042122 | 169 | 26.1% | |
| custom 5467561387205101673 | 110 | 17.0% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 647reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 21 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
НИХУЯСЕ—
❤9
Для Аморфа (прости за волосы я опять облизнула) Реакции комментарии репосты приветствуются. Сеня спасибо за звезду 🌟🌟
custom 544540207467204212215❤10custom 54451781007174894455
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩 @FrishaWal | 🤩 @mewulenss 🤩 @yorunoku0 | 🤩 @seven_seva 🤩 @chi_owchi | 🤩 @ciucvaa 🤩 @hatsu_mt2 | 🤩 @fosstet Ваша задача нарисовать тематический арт в данной палитре 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩 Подписка на организаторов (по желанию) 🤩 Репост данного поста в ваш ТГК 🤩 3-5 работ, ваш тгк и юз (Подавать заявки можно в несколько палитр, указав какая палитра у вас в приоритете) В каждую палитру будет отобрано 8-10 учас…
❤5
💣
❤14custom 54454020746720421225custom 54451781007174894454custom 54675613872051016732
немношко
custom 546756138720510167315❤8custom 54451781007174894455
любимые
❤25custom 544540207467204212217custom 544517810071748944516custom 54675613872051016734
беркут такой зайка, хихикаю
❤27custom 544517810071748944512custom 54454020746720421229
🤩🤩🤩 🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂 🤩🤩🤩🤩 @Lood_Shop777 🤩 🤩ᴀмы и господᴀ! «Lood Shop» открывает набор креаторов. Мы ищем тех, кто готов рискнуть своим талантом — и сорвать куш. 🤩 Кого мы ждем за столами: 🤩 Художников — адопты, коммишены, YCH; 🤩 Писателей — лоры, биографии, тексты под заказ; 🤩 Крафтеров — мерч, хендмейд, цифровые товары, музыкальные произведения. 🤩 🤩словия: ♥️ Подписка на шоп; ♥️ Репост это…
❤3
картинка ригби не знаю правильно нарисована пипирка или нет...
custom 544517810071748944544custom 544540207467204212232custom 546756138720510167326❤1
Хён крути 😇
custom 544517810071748944537custom 544540207467204212220custom 546756138720510167320❤5
надеюсь никто не против что я буду рисовать двумя способами 😔 (лайн/безлайн) а то я никак не могу определиться..
custom 546756138720510167311❤9custom 54454020746720421228
второйй у меня левая нога отказывает теперь придется рисовать нищими руками
custom 544517810071748944515
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @amorphooous. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 338,287 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@amorphooous named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AMORPHOUS¹⁸⁺” (@amorphooous), 147 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amorphooous.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.