Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Аммолит

@ammolite_72

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

154subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001831196600
TypeChannel
Username@ammolite_72
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ammolite_72

Growth

154155154.56 August 2026 — 155 subscribers8 August 2026 — 155 subscribers14 August 2026 — 154 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 154–155 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:36154-1
8 Aug 2026, 18:31155no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:34155first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.2%
avg views ÷ 154 subscribers
Avg views / post
58.8
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
24.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held12 (14 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total588
Reactions total146
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

184 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11964.7%
🔥2915.8%
💅115.98%
🍓105.43%
🐳42.17%
😍31.63%
❤‍🔥21.09%
💋21.09%
🤩21.09%
🥰21.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 184reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC26 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Когда-то писала, что Нань Цюшань промышляет компульсивной кражей книг, и решила зарисовать это Он не испытывает стыда за подобные преступления, так как считает, что информация обязана быть открытой и доступной. Впрочем, это не уменьшает страха того, что его обнаружат и лишат накопленных "сокровищ" #ОС_китайцы

6😍3💋2

2 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTC50 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

И наконец, финалочка Последняя и первая работы, символично для Rustytubas Дженсен похож на мимозу Его стойкость, сила растут из нечеловеческих условий Но он чудом сохранет свою нежно-желтую, пушистую заботливость и мягкость

7🔥4

2 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC46 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Предпоследняя атака на артфайт🥊 Для BoboKitty, которой я не успела ответить ещё в прошлом году, хехе Я — абсолютно неторопливый и неконкурентоспособный человек Но в каком же я восторге от состязательных, неистово решительных, одержимых героев!!

10🥰2

30 Jul 2026, 19:00 UTC57 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Артфайт атака для kiiroo!! Соскучилась по шикарным европейским дворянкам🌹 Отрицание заморозило её, а одиночество лишило любви Хотелось создать чем-то сюрреалистичную пустоту, воцарившуюся в её сердце

8🍓2🤩2

28 Jul 2026, 19:02 UTC59 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Забавная коллажная традишка🌟 Текстом хотелось высмеять образ "настоящего мужика", от которого страдает Августин из-за своего старого армейского окружения Он склонен как дотошно следовать этому образу, так и радикально уходить от него в приторную ласку #ОС_прочие

12🔥3

25 Jul 2026, 18:21 UTC64 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Славненькие работы с артфайта для CroakedTrinket и Zee🌟 В ходе ивента узнала кучу нового Про алхимию, например! Думаю, пассивная ртуть, стабильная соль и активная сера подходят вежливости, интеллекту и легкому высокомерию первого персонажа А ещё я узнала, что в фольклоре существуют люди-тюлени(шелки) В случае вторых героев, один из них достаточно мил, чтобы дарить моряку украшения на продажу :3

15

23 Jul 2026, 18:42 UTC74 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚑Нескорая помощь Артфайт атака для mixin!! Персонаж является врачом в пост-апокалиптическом мире Но они — неэтичный, кислый, авторитарный профессионал Руки больных тянутся к ним... Однако страдания назойливых пациентов безразличны герою

11🔥3❤‍🔥2

20 Jul 2026, 18:43 UTC81 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Зацензуренный вариантик в менее естественных цветах🌟 В комментах будут файлики для тех, кому любопытно посмотреть детали

💅86🍓2🐳1🔥1

20 Jul 2026, 18:00 UTC72 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🧬Мутация(TW: бодихоррор/гуро?) Принципы наследственности и изменчивости лежат в основе внутреннего конфликта Нань Цюшаня Главного героя терзают обсессии Они вынуждают ученого потакать собственным абсурдным тревогам, но их предсказуемость комфортна Его тяга к знанию и неизвестному, напротив, непредсказуема и опасна И трусость, и страсть необходимы ему #ОС_китайцы

9🔥7🐳3🍓2💅1

17 Jul 2026, 19:11 UTC59 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔵What Once Was One Снова вещь с артфайта, для angeldesir Эти два героя изначально были единой сущностью, ангелом, поэтому я решила показать раздражение, любовь и чуждость, что они испытывают друг к другу Так же как и один человек может не знать или ненавидеть определенные свои части, при этом не желая их исчезновения, скромно лелея их

8🍓4🔥2

15 Jul 2026, 18:19 UTC550 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Работа на артфайт для Spookie!🕊 Персонаж показался мне кем-то, кто настолько зависим от стресса и нездоровых отношений, что уже не может существовать без них Ему приходится наблюдать, как его свобода и покой улетают прочь в мечтательно-розовую даль по его же вине, по его болезненной привычке

14🔥4💅2

14 Jul 2026, 14:17 UTC190 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Подборка моих любимых работ!!🌟 Пытаюсь выходить в люди, хехе #PortfolioDay

13🔥5

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @ammolite_72. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 231,906 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Аммолит” (@ammolite_72), 154 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ammolite_72.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.