Channel
@ammercards
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
28subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001524507143 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ammercards |
| Description | Non-custodial Multichain Hardware Wallet with NFC Functionality. Use it to securely store your crypto, collect NFT's, play AR Games or pay in store or online with Ammer Pay. www.ammer.cards |
| Created | 22 May 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ammercards |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 28 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 28 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 22 May 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 September 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
14 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 11 | 78.6% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 7.14% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 7.14% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 7.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2022 to 16 September 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#Ammerteam at WEB3FEST. Showing photos from our current pilot with an unbanked community in the Peruvian Andes (at 3659 m altitude) together with impactMarket and Celo Foundation.
It was a great pleasure to present @ammercards to a good friend H.E. Shaikh Fawaz bin Mohamed bin Khalifa Al Khalifa, Ambassador of the Kingdom of Bahrain to the United Kingdom. Looking forward to bringing #web3 technologies to the Switzerland of the Middle East!
Here is my presentation from the Stable Summit where I demonstrate the payment flow on Ammer Cards / Ammer Wallet. It is available for every project built on one of the supporting protocols, so just DM me if we need to add your token to the payment infrastructure. https://youtu.be/C1wo2GgoOSw #stablesummit #stablecoins #web3 #onchain #web3payments #blockchain #ammer #ammercards #ammerpay #ammerwallet
Enhanced with hidden gems💎 of Ammer Wallet user experience while paying for @Ethichub ‘s coffee 🌱 with Celo branded cards at the Crypto Rockstars Cruise in Cologne. Web3 Payments made easy 🖤 #Web3 #blockchain #ammercards
⚡Exciting news⚡ We've developed a new feature that brings members of your community closer together with just one click! Our first partner to test out this feature is Power DAO Check it out here and get part in the airdrop pool of 10,000 $POWER tokens https://bit.ly/powerupwithammer
🔥1
Great news for all users of the #Waves protocol🔹 Ammer Wallet now supports 9 tokens from the Waves ecosystem, including the latest asset $POWER
🔥2
Hey, look who came to Zurich! Follow Satoshi Nakamoto and experience the future of payments 💳 Pay with TSQ tokens on @casperblockchain at Trust Square co-working space. Powered by #AmmerCards and #AmmerPay
⚡️Exciting news! Ammer Wallet now supports Litecoin ⚡️ You can store, manage and transfer your LTC within Ammer Wallet. No need to update the app, just add LTC to your assets from the home screen. Last but not least, our developers managed to implement the new currency in less than 24 hours 💪
🔥4👍1
While CT keeps discussing #SBF #FTX interview, we keep stress testing our freezing cold wallets! 🥶 And in this particular case support Telegram and @durov in his mission building easy to use decentralized infrastructure for the masses, while giving the power back to the people!
🔥4⚡1🆒1
Channel created
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @ammercards. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 182,616 of 1,604,598entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ammer Cards - The Key to Web3” (@ammercards), 28 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ammercards.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.