Channel
@amishaKalyaka
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
122subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002290225097 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @amishaKalyaka |
| Description | Каляка-маляка без опыта и знаний |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/amishaKalyaka |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 122 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:55 | 122 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (28 May 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 597 |
| Reactions total | 66 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
288 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5467496558968728706 | 98 | 34.0% | |
| custom 5391369131230501934 | 45 | 15.6% | |
| custom 6003814438094769626 | 37 | 12.8% | |
| custom 5395332277943157481 | 34 | 11.8% | |
| custom 5321220259313634677 | 18 | 6.25% | |
| custom 5249481592367232993 | 17 | 5.90% | |
| custom 5345862810268096227 | 17 | 5.90% | |
| custom 5314789748378708145 | 7 | 2.43% | |
| custom 5233376328295661346 | 6 | 2.08% | |
| custom 5397627684559799756 | 6 | 2.08% | |
| custom 5404320197089697654 | 3 | 1.04% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 288reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @amishaKalyaka. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 May 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ё, мой Мега арт на сломанный планшет от Воробушкааа, спасибо ей большое за очередной прекрасный ивент!🤍 Я очень много накидала на него хедканонов, предлагайте свои🥺 Думаю, что отрисую этого бро скорее всего в чиби версии и разыграю вам хихи🍟 #ивент #накалякала
custom 600381443809476962612custom 53458628102680962275custom 52333763282956613462
🌟🌟Красивые элдерсолты, да немного срекло, но красивые же🤩 Мой мне подарочек к др, буду раду рт этой работы👅 #накалякала 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩 По поводу моего др🌟🌟🤩 Ребята.. у меня через две недельки дршечка 19 августа, поэтому, если вы вдруг хотели бы меня поздравить, то буду очень рада картинке со своим детками по хештегу **#ос**, ну, а если вы мой бро, который живёт очень далеко от меня😭но хотели бы мне сделать.. подарочичек, …
custom 60038144380947696269custom 53147897483787081452
Posted without readable text
custom 534586281026809622711custom 60038144380947696264custom 53147897483787081452
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 52333763282956613464custom 60038144380947696261
 Newww gif of Toma  🌟🤩с новой оформой и обновой в тг, решила перерисовать уже привычную всем модельку Томы на видео • . • .” 🤩    Это ещё не всё, скоро доделаю её же с планшетиком и совсем скоро буду добавлять уже в видео с озвучкой её. Новый реф девочки тоже скоро добавлю❤️🤩🤩🤩  #видево #ос
custom 600381443809476962611custom 53147897483787081452custom 53458628102680962271
🤩❤️Ну не умею я фоны рисовать какие-то нормальные… только если это листочки какие-то🤠 Персонажи🤩 https://www.tiktok.com/@inku_demon?_r=1&_t=ZS-983JFhhMFj6 #artfight
custom 546749655896872870611custom 53913691312305019343custom 53953322779431574812custom 53147897483787081451
🤩Вторая атака! На девочку вот этой художницы🤩 https://vgen.co/Maymay Рисовала по пути на М11, каталась в Москву туда-обратно, достаточно нишевое занятие (не делайте так) 🌟🌟🌿💚 🌟🌟🤩 #artfight
custom 546749655896872870610custom 53913691312305019343custom 52494815923672329932
🤩🤩Всем добрейшого утречка и хорошего дня😺🟪 Вчера сидела в магме, почиркала луку из ALNST😈 Простоте что контента мало, все силы уходят на сбор бумажек для поступления в другую страну, сос🤩 #скетч
custom 539533227794315748110custom 54674965589687287063
Первая картинка на артфайт с ребенкой этого прекрасного художника -> @Gyaksakug Не понимаю нравится ли мне итог, но главное чтобы нравилось тому, на кого я напала хихи🤩 #artfight
custom 53953322779431574819custom 53212202593136346773
АРТФАЙТ ПОЕХАЛИ!! забыла кинуть вам акк, а ещё вот мои два ребенки (больше не успела), для вас кину перевод описания, хотите-почитайте🤩 А я буду ждать атак тех, кто учавствует, хехе Ноа🌊 Ноа — буквально вода. Древний дух, являющийся людям в образе демона, который раньше был источником боли и слез, но те, кто с ним общался, знают, что он довольно спокоен и равнодушен ко всему. Дух вселяется в тело человеком, утонувши…
custom 546749655896872870614custom 53212202593136346774custom 53913691312305019342custom 53953322779431574811
Ребятушки, я сдала все экзамены и ужу мучаюсь с поступлением, а главноеее, могу свободно рисовать! 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 🌟Помимо того, я вам не говорила, но вот, я вместе с ребятами работаю над игрой, как её назвала моя подружаня: |проектом в стиле культовых |игр Sally Face и Detroit |с легкой перчинкой и сейчас мы активно стали воркать, поэтому кому интересно, можете подписюкаться на канальчик #spoiler #Blind_Pilots
custom 546749655896872870614custom 52494815923672329935custom 53212202593136346775custom 53953322779431574811
Posted without readable text
custom 53953322779431574814custom 54674965589687287062
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @amishaKalyaka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 243,609 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@amishaKalyaka named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“aMishKa” (@amishaKalyaka), 122 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amishaKalyaka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.