1. Sirdaryoda erkakning ikkinchi xotini kundoshi va uning 5 yoshli qizini pichoqlab o’ldirdi. 2. Andjondagi bog’da atraktsion qulab tushdi. Rasmiylar 2 kishi jabrlandi dedi, guvohlar esa 7 kishi. Kim nimani yashirmoqchi? 3. Surxondaryoda 4 kishi bir kishini do’pposlab o’ldirdi. 4. PPX xodimi shantaj qilindi. u 14 yoshli qizga tegajog’lik qilishda ayblandi. 5. Sveet ko’p o’chgani haqida post yozgan blogerni Shaxsa…

Channel
"Amirxon Umarov shousi"
@amirxon_umarov_shou
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
405subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001324618517 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @amirxon_umarov_shou |
| Created | 1 September 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/amirxon_umarov_shou |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 03:20 | 405 | +6 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 22:19 | 399 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:42 | 400 | +3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:55 | 397 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:01 | 403 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 403 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 11 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
100 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 67 | 67.0% | |
| ❤ | 18 | 18.0% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 6.00% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 5.00% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 2.00% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.00% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 April 2024 to 4 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Bizga murojaat qilgan ayol hikoyasi: Murojaatimning sababi shundan iboratki, mening farzandim shifokorlarning mas’uliyatsizligi oqibatida vafot etdi, deb hisoblayman. Farzandimning sog‘lig‘ida ma’lum muammo mavjud edi. Turli shifokorlarga murojaat qilganimizda, ayrimlari jarrohlik amaliyotini tavsiya qilishdi, boshqalari esa dori-darmon bilan davolash mumkinligini aytishdi. Tekshiruvlar natijasida bir tibbiyot muas…
“Markazda gaplashamiz” biz boshladik. https://youtu.be/3xgEP0dWhBc?si=Gk96_yI8PbHMQz7l
Bizga yana bir yurakni tilka-pora qiladigan murojaat keldi… Bu safar — bir ayoldan. U shunday deydi: “Biz qishloq joyda yashaymiz… yordam so‘rash ham oson emas. Birinchi turmushimdan bir qiz farzandim bor edi. Erim ichkilikka berilib ketgan, meni kamsitardi, haqorat qilardi. Oxiri ajrashdim… Keyin ikkinchi marta turmush qurdim. Boshida hammasi yaxshi edi. Yangi turmushim meni ham, qizimni ham yaxshi qabul qildi…
❤1
Telegram: @shaxsiyqabul_bot
❤1
Matbuotda feyk va dezinformatsiya ko‘payib ketdi —Allamjonov Komil Allamjonov tele va radiokanallar hamda boshqa OAV rahbarlari bilan uchrashib jurnalistikadagi etika va OAV hamda mediatarmoqlar oldidagi dolzarb muammolar, yangi trendlar, matbuotning yaqin kelajakdagi holati, shuningdek, milliy kontent yaratish ishlarini muhokama qilibdi. Xususan, so‘nggi vaqtlarda OAV va media vakillari o‘z faoliyatlarida sensasion …
👍15❤4
"Million, million pul topib kelmasang nima keraging bor senday xotinni" - deb o'z erim mendan uydan chiqib ketishimni talab qildi. Ammo men o'lsam ham bu uydan chiqib ketmayman deganimda u meni o'z farzandlarimiz yonida kaltaklab ketti. Bundan tashqari janjalga murojaatchining o'gay qizlari ham qo'shilgan va ular o'rtasida nimalar bo'lgan? Siz bu oilaning ahvoliga qanday izoh qoldirgan bo’lardingiz? Batafsil Amir…
👍14❤3
Oilaning masalasi juda chalkashki murojaatchi ikki tomon aslida nima istayotganini nima xohlayotgani anglamayotgandek biz ekspertlarimiz tomonidan maksimal darajada yondashib yana bir oilaviy masalani hal qilishda yordam berdik. Siz bu oilaning ahvoliga qanday izoh qoldirgan bo’lardingiz? Batafsil Amirxon Umarov shousida “OCHIQCHASIGA GAPLASHAMIZ “ ko‘rsatuvi YOU TUBE kanalida ko‘rishingiz mumkin. 👇Rasmiy sahifal…
❤4👍4🎉1
Bizning ayollar naqadar sabrli va bardoshliliklarini yana bir murojaatchi ayolimiz timsolida ham ko‘rsak bo‘ladi. Turmush o‘rtog‘ining oilasi tomonidan yillar davomida bu ayolga nisbatan qilingan barcha adolatsizliklariga qaramasdan sabr qilib yashab kelgan. Batafsil Amirxon Umarov shousida “OCHIQCHASIGA GAPLASHAMIZ “ ko‘rsatuvi YOU TUBE kanalida ko‘rishingiz mumkin. 👇Rasmiy sahifalarimiz |•Telegram |•Facebook …
❤3👍3😱3🤩1
Ba’zi bir insonlar bir birlariga shu qadar moski tan ber maslikning iloji yo’q! Domla bu oilaning ikki yoshning qaysi o‘xshash jihatlarini ta’kidlab otdi? Batafsil Amirxon Umarov shousida “OCHIQCHASIGA GAPLASHAMIZ “ ko‘rsatuvi YOU TUBE kanalida ko‘rishingiz mumkin. 👇Rasmiy sahifalarimiz |•Telegram |•Facebook |•Instagram |•YouTube 🌐Tik Tok
👍4😱1
"Amirxon Umarov shousi" pinned a video
Bu galgi ko’rsatuv sonida domla hamma kuldirdi 😅 Aslida har qanday oilaviy mojarolar shu kabi go’zal tarzda yakun topib yanada yaxshilanishi mumkin va biz qo’limizdan kelgan yordamdan xursandmiz. Ko’rsatuv batafsil YOU TUBE kanalimizda ko’rishingiz mumkin. 👇Rasmiy sahifalarimiz |•Telegram |•Facebook |•Instagram |•YouTube 🌐Tik Tok
👍3😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @amirxon_umarov_shou. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 5
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 5
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@amirxon_umarov_shou named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“"Amirxon Umarov shousi"” (@amirxon_umarov_shou), 405 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amirxon_umarov_shou.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.