Channel
@americanChaz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
22subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002509603216 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @americanChaz |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 6 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/americanChaz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:30 | 22 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 22 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 6 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
31 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 45.2% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 19.4% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 19.4% | |
| 💋 | 5 | 16.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2025 to 31 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
➿:: # :: 🤩🔠🔠🔠🚬 ➖➖➖ ➖ : 「🗑 」— DUDES!! my roomie totally bonkers.😳😳 он ушёл за ТРИ часа до учёбы в глупом белом костюме голубя. oh, snap! ангела. well, #WHATEVS 🤙 🌟🌟🌟🌟 : . . BTW, happy fucking halloween! I'm thinking my 'fit's gonna flop, no cap. . ➖➖➖ ➖➖➖ #newpost ➿ text me.
❤2🔥1🥰1
➿:: # :: 🤩🔠🔠🔠🚬 ➖➖➖ ➖ : 「🗑 」— . . . whoa. ❤️ you tryna be my stepdad's twin sister or somethin'? get outta here. SCRAM!😑 не проецируй на мне свои мерзкие фетиши, я вроде как обещал не марать руки об женщин. не вынуждай меня резко менять свои планы, babe, or I'll beat the shit out of you. 🌟🌟🌟🌟 : . . EVERY TIME IT'S THE SAME THING. FUCKING FEMINIST SHITS.😭 ➖➖➖ ➖➖➖ #contact ➿ text m
➿:: # :: 🤩🔠🔠🔠🚬 ➖➖➖ ➖ : 「🗑 」— OWW, LOOK, это же та фанатичная цветастая психичка, которая дрочит мне комментарии своим бессвязным бредом из-за РЕВ-НО-СТИ!!🤩🤩 HEYY, чуваки, не будьте такими распиздяями, подайте этой cunt респект и валерьянки, ведь психолог две недели упрашивал её выйти из комнаты. 🌟🌟🌟🌟 : . . я не был настроен на личную встречу, но раз ты решила словить меня сейчас, то… 😮 окей?? уделю …
❤3🔥2
➿:: # :: 🤩🔠🔠🔠🚬 ➖➖➖ ➖ : _ 💬: : Можно ли назвать отношения в Вашей семье теплыми и близкими? Думаете ли Вы, что провели детство счастливее других людей? _ 「🗑 」— nah, чувак. даже с натяжечкой. мне слишком сложно понять и простить мою несравненную матушку за то, что она привела домой цупку в лице моего ёбаного отчима. ❕ I mean… hey, он по плохому двинутый. тупая мразь, мерзостный, гнойный прыщ на теле об…
❤1💋1🥰1
➿:: # :: 🤩🔠🔠🔠🚬 ➖➖➖ ➖ : 「🗑 」— йоу, чувакии🥰 как же долго я здесь не появлялся. прикиньте чё, я теперь живу в общаге. I can bring chicks here. well,, if I want to. fuck yeah!! 🤩🤩 🌟🌟🌟🌟 : . . мой сосед оказался очень творческим челом. каморка действительно стала уютнее. и ему очень повезло иметь такого классного, заботливого, избирательного, щедрого bro, because I bring him things to decorate our room!!…
❤3💋2🥰2🔥1
➿:: # :: 🤩🔠🔠🔠🚬 ➖➖➖ ➖ : 「🗑 」— whoa, thx for the compliment, chic. жаль, что тебе сразу крышу рвёт, если парень не готов целовать тебе ноги с первого взгляда. oopsie!🥹 если так хочешь внимания — могла его попросить, а не устраивать ток-шоу. у тебя что, предками были песчаные хомячки? если бы меня так воспитали, я бы уже давно повесился со скуки. 🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟 : . . ohh, babe!~ сама подошла, сама завезла диа…
➿:: # :: 🤩🔠🔠🔠🚬 ➖➖➖ ➖ : 「🗑 」— ты сюда приехала, чтобы ебать мозги другим своим мерзким характером и поросячими визгами, girl? крутая карма, мне бы твои амбиции . . . и крошечные кулачки. 🥱🥱 скажи спасибо хотя бы за то, что хоть кто-то в этом клоповнике соизволил вступить в диалог с такой EWW NERD как ты. 🌟🌟🌟🌟 : . . ya know, я бы тоже сюда не приехал, будь у меня выбор. но, видимо, нам суждено грешить…
➿:: # :: 🤩🔠🔠🔠🚬 ➖➖➖ ➖ : 「🗑 」— aww, ну прости, любительница свежего воздуха. 🤩 твоей проблеме есть простое решение — дышать через рот. 🌟🌟🌟🌟 : . . seriously, I smoke outside my window, типа, но, блин, ветер сегодня полный тролль. но можешь не благодарить, это всё ради твоего права ходить скромной мышкой, потея в маске. 😂😂 ➖➖➖ ➖➖➖ #contact ➿ text me.
➿:: # :: 🤩🔠🔠🔠🚬 ➖➖➖ ➖ : _ 💬: : С кем бы хотели поужинать, если бы могли выбрать любого человека? _ 「🗑 」— dude задал мне гораздо больше вопросов, чем можно было получить в обычные дни. я удивлён. и это… так мило. are u a fan of mine? I'll answer all of them, just a little later. 🌟🌟🌟🌟 : . . idk,, bro. I doubt that anyone would want to have dinner with me. I even doubt that I would want to.🤩 всей душой …
➿:: # :: 🤩🔠🔠🔠🚬 ➖➖➖ ➖ : _ 💬: : Знаешь Мимзи? Считаешь её пикмухой? _ 「🗑 」— что заставляет вас спрашивать моё мнение о девушках? 😳😳 с каких пор вас интересует моё мнение? вы ищете на меня компромат? does this not involve an attack in an alley and forced castration? 🥺 🌟🌟🌟🌟 : . . ofc, я слышал об этой girly и, кажись, даже на соц-сети подписан, но этим всё ограничено. имхо, однозначно пикми. 😏 ➖➖➖ ➖➖➖ …
➿:: # :: 🤩🔠🔠🔠🚬 ➖➖➖ ➖ : _ 💬: : Я расскажу Бельф, что ты дрочишь на её фотки _ 「🗑 」— fuckin’ hell, dude . . . я вспомил о ней считанные минуты назад, а ты уже угрожаешь мне мучительной смертью. THIS ISN'T FAIR.. 🤬 🌟🌟🌟🌟 : . . даже если так, то что с того, если она узнает, hmm? ) ➖➖➖ ➖➖➖ #SMS ➿ text me.
➿:: # :: 🤩🔠🔠🔠🚬 ➖➖➖ ➖ : _ 💬: : Hello, Chaz. Скажите, а как вы относитесь к Бельфегор?? _ 「🗑 」— who’s she?🐈⬛🐈 бляя, чел, idk. я с такими hoe ещё язык не проветривал. 🌟🌟🌟🌟 : . . If I meet this bitch, I'll tell you about my impressions first. ➖➖➖ ➖➖➖ #SMS ➿ text me.
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @americanChaz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 591,746 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@americanChaz named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐂𝐇𝐀𝐙-𝕥𝕚𝕞𝕖 ⸝⸝ dudes.ᐟ” (@americanChaz), 22 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/americanChaz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.