Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Amaranta's Art

Channel

Amaranta's Art

@amarantasart

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

454subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001650148313
TypeChannel
Username@amarantasart
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/amarantasart

Growth

45412 Aug 2026, 12:17 — 454 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 11:28 — 454 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 12:1713 Aug 2026, 11:28
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 453–455 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:28454no change
12 Aug 2026, 12:17454first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 5 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
52.5%
avg views ÷ 454 subscribers
Avg views / post
238
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held10 (5 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,667
Reactions total158
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

246 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 51998322772316162386526.4%
5723.2%
custom 52219596266180594463112.6%
🔥208.13%
custom 5255882519567418060187.32%
custom 5237724883898613754156.10%
custom 5325948223737584266135.28%
🦄124.88%
custom 577821768168977532572.85%
custom 577365597974482587862.44%
🐳20.813%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 246reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
10.0%
1 of 10 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
227
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
262
over 9 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFJWuB1B129 July 202629 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC124 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

"Одним августовским вечером, раздавленная невыносимой тяжестью собственного упорства, Амаранта заперлась в спальне, чтобы до самой смерти оплакивать своё одиночество, ибо она только что дала настойчивому полковнику окончательный ответ" Меня засосала июльская черная дыра. Не пропадаю, ребята, знайте что я где-то...в варпе

8custom 53259482237375842668custom 51998322772316162385

1 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC242 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Вк запустил пост с картами просто в космос😅 Ощущение, что на последней карте с похоронами я нашла свою целевую и стиль) Слегка есть вопросы, что мне теперь со всем этим делать.. Вот я стою, приоткрываю дверь своего дома посреди болот..И вижу, что кажется, теперь гостиная должна быть побольше 😄

custom 522195962661805944616custom 51998322772316162388custom 52558825195674180605

30 Jul 2026, 11:01 UTC262 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Одна из самых любимых мной карт

custom 523772488389861375415custom 519983227723161623813custom 52219596266180594467

29 Jul 2026, 15:41 UTC256 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Работа работой.. Но в голове только мысли о защите Империума от ксенобиологической угрозы🥲

custom 53259482237375842665custom 57782176816897753253🐳2

29 Jul 2026, 12:07 UTC227 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFJWuB1BForwarded from @predzakazknigPhoto

#купить #читайгород #фэнтези ОТКРЫТ ПРЕДЗАКАЗ Марина Суржевская «Двериндариум» (специальное издание) 📚 предзаказ в читай-городе 😊Иллюстрации на обложке, обрезе, оформление блока: Ольга Неходова 😊Иллюстрации на форзаце и нахзаце: Александр Саев (son) 😊Внутренние иллюстрации: Amaranta, Милана Корягина 😊Леттеринг: Вера Голосова Реклама. Рекламодатель ООО «Новый Книжный Центр». ОГРН 1027700282763

custom 519983227723161623886custom 52558825195674180604

29 Jul 2026, 12:07 UTC147 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Концентрация красивых мужчин в книге превышена до критических значений 🩷 первая книга с МиФ (рисовала внутрянки с персонажами)

custom 519983227723161623852custom 52558825195674180602

19 Jul 2026, 12:51 UTC409 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Форзацы с сестрами Эстерхази✨ для книги Оксаны Пелевиной «Вампирус Новус» #лигамечтателей #вампирус_новус

🔥20custom 51998322772316162389custom 52558825195674180607

11 Jul 2026, 13:39 UTC486 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Подруги уговаривают меня сделать серии открыток по городам. Не знаю, в какой параллельной вселенной и когда я найду время на это, но если бы вам было бы интересно, я подумаю🙂✨

🦄12custom 52219596266180594468custom 57782176816897753254

11 Jul 2026, 13:34 UTC601 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Пара спойлерочков к майско-июньскому проекту🌸 Для меня он был немного необычным из-за большого количества архитектуры, но очень вдохновляющим и интересным)

20custom 51998322772316162388

5 Jul 2026, 12:08 UTC406 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Новая подборочка любимых карт. Теперь с Калебом) Сторителлинг в иллюстрациях сложился сам собой. Везде Мадлен в желтом)✨ #печать_нострадамуса #лига_мечтателей

21custom 51998322772316162389custom 57736559797448258786

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @amarantasart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 349,907 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Amaranta's Art” (@amarantasart), 454 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amarantasart.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.