Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Amai Ven

@amaiven23

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

80subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001622730570
TypeChannel
Username@amaiven23
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/amaiven23

Growth

798079.56 August 2026 — 79 subscribers9 August 2026 — 79 subscribers13 August 2026 — 80 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 79–80 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:5680+1
9 Aug 2026, 19:1779no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:3279first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 31 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
104.4%
avg views ÷ 80 subscribers
Avg views / post
83.5
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held18 (31 May 20268 August 2026)
Views total334
Reactions total45
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 56s
Average length
2m 58s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

210 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥13765.2%
🍓4521.4%
😱104.76%
🗿73.33%
👍62.86%
👀52.38%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 210reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC24 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Очень поломала себе мозги, пока рисовала эту коммишку 🫠 В безлайне такие крупные работы я рисовала впервые, поэтому местами было ощущение: «А я вообще знаю, что делаю?..» 😂 Но, если честно, я сама в шоке от результата и в хорошем смысле! Очень довольна тем, что в итоге получилось Спидпейнт, как всегда, будет в комментариях 👀✨

❤‍🔥3🍓2

31 Jul 2026, 12:16 UTC117 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Я не знаю, что писать

❤‍🔥9🍓4

26 Jul 2026, 12:55 UTC91 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Наконец-то закончила эту коммишку! 🎉 Это был довольно необычный опыт, потому что впервые пришлось рисовать по референсу из Roblox (или, по крайней мере, очень похожему 😅). Самым сложным оказалось разобраться с одеждой и понять, как именно выглядят сами персонажи. Но, несмотря на все сложности, результатом я очень довольна. Кажется, получилось сохранить атмосферу и при этом сделать арт более живым и детализированным.

❤‍🔥8🍓7

15 Jul 2026, 11:17 UTC102 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥7😱3🍓2

13 Jul 2026, 05:59 UTC97 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Я, если честно, просто в шоке. TikTok поставил на моё последнее видео плашку «Создано ИИ». 🗿 Самое забавное, что это полностью мой рисунок, вручную прорисовывала каждую деталь, а теперь платформа решила, что это работа нейросети. Как художнику, который вкладывает столько времени и сил в свои работы, видеть такую отметку очень обидно. Кто-нибудь ещё сталкивался с этим? Получалось убрать эту плашку или теперь TikTo

🗿7😱7🍓3

12 Jul 2026, 07:23 UTC77 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Параллельно рисую ещё один заказ, и, кажется, я уже начинаю подозревать, что очень скоро пожалею о своих решениях... 😂 Почему? Потому что я зачем-то сделала волосы настолько детализированными. Пока в чёрно-белом виде это выглядит красиво, но стоит только представить, покрас... Чувствую, на волосы уйдёт какое-то нереальное количество времени. 👽 Но отступать уже поздно. Теперь остаётся только принять свою судьбу и до

❤‍🔥11🍓3

11 Jul 2026, 12:20 UTC60 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥10🍓3👍2

10 Jul 2026, 14:26 UTC61 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Я наконец закончила этот арт, и, честно говоря, я очень довольна результатом. 💜 На него ушло 20 часов работы, и за это время я чуть не сошла с ума от количества камней. Серьёзно, когда начинала рисовать фон, даже не подозревала, что мне предстоит провести столько времени, прорисовывая каждый выступ, трещинку и деталь. 😭 Были моменты, когда хотелось больше никогда не рисовать камни, но сейчас, глядя на готовую работ

❤‍🔥11🍓4👍2

8 Jul 2026, 10:40 UTC74 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Я так рандомно рисую без лайна, что иногда сама не понимаю, как это вообще работает. 👽 Сначала просто набрасываю общую форму. Потом почему-то начинаю прорисовывать верхние части. Теперь вот перешла к боковым. Никакого чёткого плана, никакой последовательности, просто мозг в какой-то момент говорит: «Сегодня рисуем вот это», и я послушно соглашаюсь. 😂 Но, как ни странно, такой способ у меня почему-то работает. Главн

❤‍🔥10🍓2

5 Jul 2026, 08:29 UTC84 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Потихоньку продолжаю рисовать фон для игры. 💜 На первый взгляд кажется, что это всего лишь несколько камушков... Но именно на них у меня ушло целых 6 часов. 😅 Порой кажется, что прогресс слишком медленный, но я стараюсь не торопиться. Лучше потратить больше времени сейчас, чем потом переделывать половину работы. Надеюсь, в итоге все эти часы окупятся красивым результатом. Осталось ещё очень много работы, но понемн

❤‍🔥12🍓3

4 Jul 2026, 11:34 UTC91 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Наконец-то я смогла вернуться к рисованию! 👽 Даже несмотря на то, что я всё ещё нахожусь в больнице, понемногу продолжаю работать над проектом. Очень соскучилась по планшету и самому процессу рисования. Правда, без приключений не обошлось... 😅 У меня внезапно слетел холст с наброском и теперь Ibis Paint постоянно выдает ошибку при попытке его открыть. Уже думала, что придется рисовать всё заново. Но, к счастью, ко

❤‍🔥9🍓2👍2

6 Jun 2026, 07:31 UTC117 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Пока что процесс двигается очень медленно. К сожалению, в последнее время я не очень хорошо себя чувствую, поэтому работать в привычном темпе не получается. Надеюсь, что скоро мне станет лучше и я смогу вернуться к работе с новыми силами и быстрее радовать вас прогрессом. Спасибо всем, кто остаётся со мной и поддерживает меня. 💜

❤‍🔥12🍓2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @amaiven23. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Jun 2026, 14:05 UTCAnonymous Poll27 voters

Какой вариант лучше?

  1. 111%
  2. 211%
  3. 378%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 543,109 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Amai Ven” (@amaiven23), 80 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amaiven23.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.