Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

AlyaLi печатает…

@alyapechataet

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

448subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001526069331
TypeChannel
Username@alyapechataet
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/alyapechataet

Growth

448453450.57 August 2026 — 453 subscribers8 August 2026 — 453 subscribers14 August 2026 — 448 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 447–454 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:53448-5
8 Aug 2026, 05:01453no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:38453first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 10 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
48.6%
avg views ÷ 448 subscribers
Avg views / post
218
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held14 (10 May 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,523
Reactions total207
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

487 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 541572549133416890413126.9%
custom 54652779377774103848417.2%
custom 53010255550160657036814.0%
custom 53708096295907133046212.7%
custom 5350482412667180187469.45%
custom 5460695302161850149469.45%
custom 5217874146351933727265.34%
custom 5395870579079280491244.93%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 487reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
7.14%
1 of 14 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
124
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
371
over 13 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFGXo7jw13 August 20263 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2026 to 5 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC111 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Слушайте, а кто-то играет (и соотвественно читает) в Водяную Лилию? Я смотрю, что фд живет (в части Деклана), а он мне понравился по тем сериям, которые прошла. Может пора сменить сторону? 😁 Картинка

custom 54157254913341689049custom 53010255550160657035custom 54652779377774103844

3 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC124 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFGXo7jwForwarded from @predzakazknigPhoto

#купить #читайгород #даркроманы ОТКРЫТ ПРЕДЗАКАЗ Ирина Тис «Монстр Нокса» 📚 предзаказ в читай-городе 💫 промокод: ПЕРСИК до 31.08 скидка 25% на заказы от 2000 рублей Реклама. Рекламодатель ООО «Новый Книжный Центр». ОГРН 1027700282763

custom 54157254913341689047custom 53708096295907133043custom 53958705790792804913custom 53010255550160657031

28 Jul 2026, 12:36 UTC199 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @BorisRomanovvetkaPhoto

Эстетика, которая им идёт🌹 #ииарт от Грешница Каина ✨

custom 546527793777741038415custom 54157254913341689047custom 53708096295907133044

25 Jul 2026, 07:38 UTC283 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Не знаю, как долго буду её писать, но буду. А ещё говорят, что отзывы ускоряют процесс 🌚

custom 535048241266718018716custom 54157254913341689047custom 53958705790792804912custom 54652779377774103842

23 Jul 2026, 16:51 UTC267 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Помните, я хотела писать новую работу и просила помощи с названием? Больше было за «Обсессию», но мне ближе «Русские сказки» — они хорошо подходят по смыслу. В последнее время часто об этой истории думаю. И про «Семь» тоже. А последние главы «Цены свободы» сегодня начала перечитывать, но не об этом сейчас. Просто видео попалось — вот такой у «Сказок» хочу вайб 🥀

custom 537080962959071330411custom 53958705790792804917custom 53010255550160657036custom 54652779377774103842

22 Jul 2026, 17:25 UTC240 views66 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

— Алло. — Не могу сейчас разговаривать, у меня дочь. — Ты же сама мне позвонила. — Мне нужно на неё смотреть. Всё, пока. Та самая причина, почему я больше не прилежный автор. Но я вернусь (когда насмотрюсь и посплю). Понять и простить.

custom 541572549133416890437custom 530102555501606570315custom 546527793777741038414

18 Jul 2026, 17:08 UTC299 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @neomitxx_artPhoto

🐍Drakula?…🐍 #борисилэйн #сн3 #снр

custom 546527793777741038414custom 53708096295907133048custom 54157254913341689048

15 Jul 2026, 17:07 UTC371 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

А я тут Лэйн нашла 🔪

custom 546527793777741038424custom 53708096295907133048custom 53504824126671801877custom 53958705790792804911

27 Jun 2026, 15:32 UTC551 views47 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Да! 🙂‍↕️

custom 537080962959071330428custom 539587057907928049110custom 53010255550160657037custom 54652779377774103842

11 Jun 2026, 21:00 UTC626 views52 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

❌🤩тим безумно красивым и нежным артом от любимой Иры хотела сообщить дату публикации новой главы, но, увы, она не написана. Я честно пыталась, но слишком много всего наложились, наслоилось, собралось в кучу — справиться не вышло. Некоторые обстоятельства от нас не зависят — поэтому так. Но я продолжаю придерживаться мнения, что всё, что происходит, — только к лучшему. ❌🤩о плану у «Цены свободы» остаётся дописать две

custom 535048241266718018723custom 521787414635193372715custom 546069530216185014914

6 Jun 2026, 18:23 UTC489 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

❌Просто красивое показать на минуточку 💘

custom 530102555501606570325custom 541572549133416890412custom 54606953021618501496custom 53958705790792804911

5 Jun 2026, 12:55 UTC432 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @neomitxx_artPhoto

🦢Лебедина любовь🦢 #борисилэйн #снр #сн3

custom 541572549133416890416custom 52178741463519337275custom 54652779377774103844custom 54606953021618501491

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @alyapechataet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 305,275 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AlyaLi печатает…” (@alyapechataet), 448 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alyapechataet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.