Channel
@alxmxv_oc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
152subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001374687110 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alxmxv_oc |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alxmxv_oc |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 152 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 152 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (19 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 782 |
| Reactions total | 92 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
92 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 35 | 38.0% | |
| custom 5282864655172132132 | 17 | 18.5% | |
| custom 5260706339071468433 | 10 | 10.9% | |
| 💔 | 6 | 6.52% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 5.43% | |
| custom 5204449388549658136 | 4 | 4.35% | |
| custom 5258249733742296479 | 3 | 3.26% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 3.26% | |
| custom 5220122218133991835 | 2 | 2.17% | |
| custom 5870564112823488984 | 2 | 2.17% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 2.17% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 2.17% | |
| custom 5341674117642854617 | 1 | 1.09% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
до конца октября афк, буду без релизов к сожалению и возьму отдых от соц. сетей на какое-то время пока ☠️ так что на связи, желаю вам хорошего последнего месяца каникул, а те кто работает, то хороших нервов и удачи на работе😉 всех люблю и всех обнял <3 с любовью, ваш любимый алимов❤️
custom 52828646551721321322❤1custom 53416741176428546171
выбирайте вообщем, возможно на все сделаем если получится, либо постепенно по одному конкурсу буду проводить 🐱 выбор за вами 🥱
custom 52828646551721321322❤1custom 52607063390714684331
на что устроить конкурс?
The shares total 143%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
к моему возвращению домой постараюсь сделать, так что ждите 🥱
custom 52607063390714684332❤1custom 52828646551721321321
делаю конкурс на что-нибудь для вас? и хотите ли вы его
The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
💘2
ждите в скором времени еще релиз с подольским с которым написали тот самый трек, это будет что-то атмосферное и одновременно хайповое, что взорвёт снова чарты 😊 ожидайте вообщем)
custom 52828646551721321323❤2custom 52607063390714684332
трек 2007 пока что удален из площадок, скоро возможно вернется, пока работаем над этим ☠️
💔3custom 52044493885496581362custom 52828646551721321322
если у меня когда-нибудь спросят куда я деваю ползарплаты, то я отвечу им вот так: инвентарь в кс на сумму около 30к+ стим аккаунт на 30-40к+ из-за игр и прокачки переферия для компа и моего хобби (музыки) около 20к+ ну и многое другое☠️
custom 52828646551721321322❤1custom 52607063390714684331
закинул новых реакций вам ☠️
custom 52607063390714684334custom 52044493885496581362custom 58705641128234889842
с 1 августа ребятки🥱
💔3❤2custom 52201222181339918352
🤍 Привет, у нас праздник! Мы празднуем уже год работы! Это время пролетело незаметно, но именно благодаря вам, мы являемся теми, кому доверяют артисты разного эшелона. Мы благодарны каждому из вас за то, что верите в нас! 🖤 Мы не сидим на месте, и работаем над улучшениями внутри системы нашего издательства. Начиная с понедельника, наши артиста начнут отгружаться на базе нашего сайта, подробнее информация будет в кан…
❤5❤🔥3custom 52582497337422964793
рассказывайте как поживаете ребятки, и чего нового произошло у вас за это время?
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @alxmxv_oc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
на что устроить конкурс?
The shares total 143%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
делаю конкурс на что-нибудь для вас? и хотите ли вы его
The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 172,629 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“alxmxv fam!ly” (@alxmxv_oc), 152 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alxmxv_oc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.