Просто как он хайпует - Кстати, одним из первых популяризаторов биткойна в даркнете был именно Ульбрихт со своей нарко-площадкой Silk Road
😱1

Channel
@altair_mu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
64subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002104437288 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @altair_mu |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/altair_mu |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 64 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 64 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 24 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
51 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 17 | 33.3% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 11.8% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 11.8% | |
| 🐳 | 4 | 7.84% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 7.84% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 7.84% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 5.88% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 3.92% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 1.96% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.96% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 1.96% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.96% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.96% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 November 2024 to 22 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Просто как он хайпует - Кстати, одним из первых популяризаторов биткойна в даркнете был именно Ульбрихт со своей нарко-площадкой Silk Road
😱1
Dogecoin появился на сайте Департамента эффективности правительства США (DOGE), который возглавит Маск
❤1
Что ты знаешь за флекс ?
🤣4
Крик души 😅
💯2
До /После Скрин от одного парня который просто по фану зашел в монету Трамп под конец всего хайпа
👍2🔥1
В связи с последними событиями
😁1
Ramadan Crypton вчера исполнилось 3 года Для меня это лучший канал из всех что я видел по фундаменталу Рамадан криптон в моем кругу это уже бренд Сказал Рамадан , - значит к этому стоит прислушаться Всегда в курсе всего Всегда изучает проекты и тенденции Для меня лично , это большой пример профессионализма Давайте поддержим проект нашего брата ➡️ «Ramadan» В честь трехлетия сейчас на канале проходит конкурс З…
❤9
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
USDT снова шумит Все криптобиржи в ЕС обязаны удалить USDT до 30 декабря. Главное чтобы мой план по обрушению USDT произошел после хорошей бычки 😆
Страшные истории на ночь проект NotPixel - настоящая драма В команде Диктатора куча людей задонатили огромные суммы Мой знакомый залили более 800к ₽ И казалось бы 4-6 иксов железно уже вот вот в кармане Сам Диктатор залили в этот проект примерно половину бюджета Казахстана 😅 Целая масса пользователей добавляли ботов, настраивали макросы. Работали и жили этим проектом И вот - Диктатору и всем топовым пользовате…
😢3👎2❤1
Павел Дуров запустил новый проект который дает очки за сообщения которые вы отправляли за все время Один раз зашли и забрали дроп ➡️Planes⬅️ Там есть еще доп задания. В прошлый раз проект Dogs от Дурова тоже раздал монетки Лично мне тогда выпало 5к рублей просто за одно нажатие так что - газ 🔥
BTC хоть и стоит 100к но ажиотаж не наблюдается Нету большого фуда по теме того что биток якобы будет «защитным активом с поддержкой государств» и т.п бреда По этому 100к это только начало
🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @altair_mu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 747,162 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@altair_mu named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Altair Crypto 🦇” (@altair_mu), 64 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/altair_mu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.