alwaaays 1000/10! JUJURRR KAMU NGEBANTUUU AKU BANGEEETTT KAAAK, akuu bener bener paling nyamann joktug ke kamuuu 🫠🫠🫠🤍🤍❗❗ price nya jugaa affordable bgt plsplspls walauu di awall adaa sedikit miskom darii akunyaa, aku minta maaf bangeet iaaa.. KM DEBESSSS BANGET KAAAK, TERIMAKASIH BANGET AKU KE TUHAN UDAH MEMPERTEMUKAN AKU & KAK SHANUM, pengerjaan nyaa juga cepeeet bangeett. hasilnyaa juga sjskjsnsns, MAKASIH BANYAAK …

Channel
Proof @Sccholarly. 🌛
@alsoshanum
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 26 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004371055199 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alsoshanum |
| First recorded | 26 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alsoshanum |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 19:22 | 5 | no change |
| 26 Sept 2026, 18:47 | 5 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 3 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1222.0%
- avg views ÷ 5 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 61.1
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (3 September 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,222 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 19:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
10000000/10 untuk ratenya 🤩 trusteddd bangett ya gaes yaa no tipu-tipu deh😎 kakaknya juga fast respon & fast proses jugaa pastinya :D dann ramaaahh poll😵💫🩷 lovyu kk shanumm, makasi sudah meringankan beban ini
Aku kasih rate 1000/10. Jujur awalnya ragu buat joki-joki gitu karena banyak yang hasilnya gak memuaskan, tapi pas coba joki ke kamu, hasilnya bener-bener memuaskan banget dan gak mengecewakan sama sekali. Ditambah harganya super terjangkau, jujur gak nyangka. Dengan harga seterjangkau itu, pengerjaannya super cepet pulaa, bener-bener langsung jadi di hari itunya. Selain itu, kamunya juga super ramah, jadi mau diskus…
1000 out of 10 for @sccholarly 🏅⛳️. i’m incredibly impressed ^0^ the work was done fast and the results exceeded all expectations 🪁🪞. service was top-notch *__*, and i couldn’t find anything to criticize 🛀🏻. if you’re considering @sccholarly, go for it—you won’t be disappointed 🚏🎗. the quality and price are unbeatable [serious]. i’ll definitely be coming back 🚴🏻♀. thanks for an outstanding experience! 🧾✂️ xOxO >__*
10000/10 kakaknya fast respon, ramah dan bakkk, pengerjaannya cepet. Hasilnya juga sesuai dengan yang dimau, engga mengecewakan. Engga overprice. Worth it to buy! Thank you kakk
BOLEH BANGEETT. 1000/10, pengerjaan cepettt poll, kakaknya ramah dan paham sama apaa yang di intruksii, dan tugasnya detaill bangeett
jujur cepet banget sumpah ga nyangka bakalan jadi secepet itu terus fast respon jugaa, hasilnya juga memuaskaaannnnn bangetttt, sukaaaakkkk deh sesuai ekspektasiiii!!! <333
10000000/10 dare i say. I DONT EVEN KNOW WHERE TO BEGINNN but thank you so much kak shanum untuk kerja keras nyaaa. jujur aku pun menyadari kalau tugas ini berat karena makalah nya panjangg, deadline mepet, kelompok ku hilang hilangan, apalagi kakak nya juga lagi sakitt. sumpah semoga kak shanum gak trauma sama aku karena kayaknya next time aku bakal reorder😭 soalnya despite all of that problems, tetep bisa selesai t…
NICEEE OKAAAYY KAKKK AKU SUKA HASILNYAAA NEXT KLO ADA TUGAS MAKALAH NDADAK AK REPEAT ORDER KE KAKAK YAHHH
EGILUY INI SAKING BAGUSNYA MAHADAHSYAT MASTERPIECE RASANYA KYK AKU MAU CIUM TANGAN KAKAKNYA TERUS FOR LIKE TWENTY FOUR SEVEN ?!?!!!! HH SUMPAH DEWABGT TANGANNYA. BAGUSBGT, CEPAT JG, DAN TENTUNYA GAK OOT ATAU ASAL-ASALAN. DIKERJAIN PAKE HATI YAH INI??? 😭😭💟💟💟💟💟 TERUS KAKAKNYA JG LUCU, KOMUNIKATIF, INTINYA BINTANG ∞ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ mamaci okay
WHY NOTTTT here i’ll give sccholarly 100000000000000 out of 10!!! ❤️🩹💞💗🤎💘💟😛 TIDAK ADA KATA MENYESAL DALAM DADAKU SEBAB TELAH ORDER DI SINI HAHAHA, aku burnout jir these days jd buntu kalo mau garap makalah makanya order di mari HEHE :pPpP taaaapi sumpahya aku ga expect aja sih bakal secepet itu ngerjainnya wkswkkw. aku order around jam set 6 an terus jam 8 udah selesai njir???? AJAIB GAKSI???? LU NGILMU DI MANE KAK …
Halo, kak aku mau review hasil joktug di kakak, overall aku puas sama hasilnya karena mudah dipahami juga notes nya, kakaknya juga enak diajak komunikasi dan super duper fleksibel dan sat set, thank you so much kak
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @alsoshanum. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Proof @Sccholarly. 🌛” (@alsoshanum), 5 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alsoshanum.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.