![Telegram profile photo for al-Qawl as-Sadeed [Archive]](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/b0/b085cac75798f9f3878f3874f5a328cac8d9dbc8632144903a62f9215e63efc4.jpg)
Channel
@alqawl1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
377subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002032028601 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alqawl1 |
| Description | Mostly an archive of posts from the blog, with perhaps the occasional new post. |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 28 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alqawl1 |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Sept 2026, 08:22 | 377 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 29 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (29 May 2026 – 20 September 2026) |
| Views total | 51 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Sept 2026, 08:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
24 reactions across 10 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 15 | 62.5% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 37.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Your Level of Knowledge Might Necessitate That You Follow a Madhab – Shaykh Sālih al-Fawzān Shaykh Sālih al-Fawzān حفظه الله was asked: “What is the ruling of adhering and ascribing to a madhab such as the Hanbali, Shāfi’i, or Māliki schools, and is there anything blameworthy therein?” The Shaykh حفظه الله replied: “The details regarding this are of three types, the first of which is concerning an individual whose…
👍1
The Mawlid Is a Good Bida’ah? They say celebrating the Mawlid is a good innovation (bida’ah hasanah) Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, stated: “Whoever brings forth an innovation in Islam seeing it as something good has claimed that Muhammad صلى الله عليه و سلم betrayed the message. This is because Allah says, ‘On this day I have completed your religion for you’ [Qur’an 5:3], so whatever was not from the re…
To Celebrate the Mawlid? [al-Khudhayr] Presenter: The questioner says: What is the ruling for the celebration and gathering of people for the Prophet’s birthday, along with reciting the Qur’an and something from the Sunnah, trading lines of poetry and prophetic praise, and preparing food in it? Is this a good custom (originally observed) by the Salaf? Shaykh Abdul Karim al-Khudhayr: “No doubt, loving the Prophet i…
Channel name was changed to «al-Qawl as-Sadeed [Archive]»
Cultivation of the Scholars to Those Preoccupied with Gossip and Hearsay A young man approached our Shaykh Abdullah ibn 'Aqīl رحمه الله at Masjid al-Harām and began asking him about various individuals... The Shaykh did nothing but stand and leave him. This kind of discipline is better than delving with them into fruitless arguments and feeble debates. Shared via Telegram on the channel of Shaykh Hussain al-Balūs…
👍2
تربية العلماء للمشتغلين بالقيل والقال والكلام عن الناس.. جاء شابٌ إلى شيخنا عبدالله ابن عقيل -رحمه الله- بالمسجد الحرام، وأخذ يسأله عن فلانٍ وفلانٍ من الناس.. فما كان من الشيخ إلا أن قام وتركه.. مثل هذا النوع من التأديب خيرٌ من الخوض مع أولئك في مناقشات عقيمة، ومناظرات سقيمة..
Wahb ibn Munabbih رحمه الله stated: "The physicians are unanimous that the cornerstone of medicine is moderation in diet, and the wise are unanimous that the cornerstone of wisdom is silence." Kitāb as-Samt by ibn Abī ad-Dunyā قال وهب بن منبه : أجمَعَت الأطباء على أنَّ رأسَ الطّبِّ الحِمْيَة. وأجمَعت الحُكَماء على أنَّ رأسَ الحِكْمَة الصَّمْت. 📚 الصمت لابن أبي الدنيا
❤6👍1
When a Sin Becomes a Means of Rectification Ibnul Qayyim al-Jawziyyah رحمه الله stated: “How often does a sin become the cause for the servant’s rectification, fleeing to Allah, and abandoning the paths of deviation. Such a person is like one who falls ill and then realizes his unhealthy condition, though hidden within him are chronic and deadly ailments of which he is unaware. He takes medicine, and it removes tho…
👍2
The great scholar and carrier of the Shāfi'ī madhab, Abu Ibrahīm Isma'īl al-Muzanī رحمه الله mentioned: "Imām ash-Shāfi’ī heard me one day as I was saying, 'So and so is a kadhāb (habitual liar)', so he said to me: 'O, Abu Ibrahīm, if only you'd watch your words. Don't say "kadhāb", rather, say "his speech has no value."" Source: al-'Ilān bil-Tawbīkh Shared by Shaykh Ahmed al-Qu’aymi حفظه الله on Telegram في «ال…
👍3
Archive post from June, 7 2024 100 Benefits of ibn Uthaymīn 31/100 A Good Opinion is the Basis https://qawlunsadeed.wordpress.com/2024/06/02/100-benefits-of-ibn-uthaymin-31-100/
A Sign that Allah Intends Good for His Servant al-Imām Muhammad ibn al-Hussain al-Ajurrī رحمه الله wrote in his book ‘Ash-Sharī’ah’: علامة من أراد الله به خيرا سلوك هذا الطريق ؛ كتاب الله ، وسنن رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم ، وسنن أصحابه رضي الله عنهم ، ومن تبعهم بإحسان ، وما كان عليه أئمة المسلمين في كل بلد ، إلى آخر ما كان من العلماء ؛ مثل : الأوزاعي ، وسفيان الثوري ، ومالك بن أنس ، والشافعي ، وأحمد بن حنبل ، وال…
❤1👍1
al-Imām Ahmad ibn Hanbal رحمه الله stated: "Part of a man's lack of knowledge is his blind following other men in his religion." Majmū al-Fatāwa 20/212 Arabic quote shared by telegram channel: 📌قناة مختصّة بنشر أقوال العلماء والصالحين. https://t.me/gurabx قال أحمد بن حنبل: من قلة علم الرجل أن يقلد دينه الرجال. #مجموع_الفتاوى [٢١٢/٢٠] 📚
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @alqawl1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
What are your thoughts on the inclusion of AI in terms of Da'wah?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 20 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“al-Qawl as-Sadeed [Archive]” (@alqawl1), 377 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alqawl1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.