3 measurements spanning 1 day, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean βno change observedβ, never βinterpolatedβ. The vertical axis spans 143β146 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 21:32
143
no change
8 Aug 2026, 09:55
143
-3
7 Aug 2026, 18:57
146
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 13 March 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
11
Links
2
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 8 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
23 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
β€
8
34.8%
π₯
6
26.1%
π
2
8.70%
π³
2
8.70%
β‘
1
4.35%
π
1
4.35%
π―
1
4.35%
π₯°
1
4.35%
π¦
1
4.35%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 23reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2026 to 14 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Alonzo Degens Lab π§ π·π° pinned Β«Ok let's get some house ground rules hereβ¦ 1. Firstly if I share a low cap MC donβt buy more than 2% 2. And if you missed an entry on any play , donβt fomo, wait for dip or for the next play 3. Lastly and very important always make sure to take your profitsβ¦Β»
Ok let's get some house ground rules hereβ¦
1. Firstly if I share a low cap MC donβt buy more than 2%
2. And if you missed an entry on any play , donβt fomo, wait for dip or for the next play
3. Lastly and very important always make sure to take your profits out (if you sell youβre jeet, yes be the jeet thatβs in profits than a holder that ends up broke ..
Aped on this cute dog $momo
842xzGPaCWTVqpZJLdzcfUZSH4EUMsf5w1piR4KPpump
Signed M
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @alonzodegens. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channelβs posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@alonzodegens named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant β a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@trendingsevents named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 β 9 August 2026 Β· confirmed gone 13 August 2026 (two independent sightings β see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 β this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βAlonzo Degens Lab π§ π·π°β (@alonzodegens), 143 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alonzodegens.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
