Channel
@alnimi2020
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
324subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001208362904 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alnimi2020 |
| Description | ناشط سياسي ________________________________ 🔸️واتساب: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb1Ly85 🔸فيسبوك: www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100047956575653 🔸تويتر: twitter.com/Alnimi1975 🔸يوتيوب : youtube.com/Alnaemi2020 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alnimi2020 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:20 | 324 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:30 | 324 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (8 December 2025 – 19 July 2026) |
| Views total | 187 |
| Reactions total | 13 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
205 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 106 | 51.7% | |
| ❤ | 81 | 39.5% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 3.41% | |
| 🫡 | 6 | 2.93% | |
| 👌 | 5 | 2.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 205reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 December 2025 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alnimi2020. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 December 2025 to 19 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
المملكة العربية السعودية الآن تحاول أن تتواصل مع أكثر من وسيط، ومع أكثر من دولة، في محاولة لشراء الوقت فقط." "المملكة العربية السعودية، كما قال السيد عبد الملك، تُجهّز نفسها لحرب شاملة على اليمن عضو المكتب السياسي لأنصار الله عبد الله النعمي لـ #الميادين ؛••━•━•━•━•━•━•━•━•━•━••؛؛ https://t.me/Hsan_Dawd
👍6❤1
عضو المكتب السياسي في ح.ركة أنص/ار الله عبد الله النعمي للميادين: ⭕بعض العروض قدمت لنا من السعودية كالحصول على امتيازات مالية أو توسع ح.ركة أنص/ار الله في الجغرافيا اليمنية ⭕لن نقف مكتوفي الأيدي وهناك الكثير من الحلول #الميادين
👍5❤1
مليونية السبعين تؤكد التمسك بخيار الجهاد كخيار استراتيجي وحيد وتبعث برسائل لقوى الاستكبار والسعودية بأن موازين المرحلة تغيّرت لصالح الشعوب. ♦️ عبدالله النعمي - عضو المكتب السياسي لأنصار الله
❤7🫡1
ماذا تعني النقاط العشر التي تم الإتفاق عليها بين الجمهورية الاسلامية في ايران، وبين امريكا??
❤7👍4
ماهي الأسباب والعوئق التي تقف أمام المستثمرين؟
❤8👍5
الى حد الآن لم يدخل اليمن ارض المعركة العسكرية بشكل حقيقي وملموس. والعمليتان التي تم الإعلان عنهما مؤخرا لم تكونا سوى رسالة اراد اليمن من خلالهما ان يشرح مضمون البيان الذي اعلنه العميد يحيى سريع قبل انطلاق العمليتين. واعتقد ان الرسالة وصلت والشرح كان واضحا وشافيا وكافيا.
👍9🔥5
يقولون ان 80% من الضربات الايرانية استهدفت دول الخليج، و20% فقط توجهت نحو العdو الاsرائيلي. طيب ممكن تنزلوا احصائية بأعددا القتلى والجرحى من ابناء الخليج? وهل من الممكن تنزلوا صور للمنازل التي استهدفت في الاحياء المدنية التي لاعلاقة لها باطلاق الصواريخ الاmريكية على ا,يرا.ن?
👍8
عضو المكتب السياسي لحركة أنصار الله عبد الله النعمي لـ"العهد": نحن جاهزون وأيدينا على الزناد bio.link/alahadtv
👍11❤4
كلمة واحدة لو تقولها ايران سيجعلونها تسود المنطقة، وتعود مرة اخرى شرطي الخليج، وسيسلمونها مفتاح ادارة دول الخليج مرة اخرى كما كانت ايام الشاة. هذه العبارة الطلوبة هي ان تقول فقط (لم تعد لي اي علاقة بالقضية الفلسطينية). مشكلتها وذنبها الوحيد هو وقوفها في وجه اسرائيل ودعمها للاخوة الفلسطينيين.
👍10❤3👌3
اذا اقدم ترامب على تنفيذ تهديده باستهداف جزيرة خارك الٱيرانية. فستشتعل المنطقة برمتها. وستتحول آبار النفط الى فوهات براكين لن تبقي ولن تذر.. ايران تعي جيدا ان ماتتعرض له حاليا هو من دول الخليح قبل غيرها. ايران بيدها اهداف موجعة اشد وجعا والما من الاهداف التي يمتلكها خصومها.
👍7❤3👌1
لو كانت دول الخليج خالية من القواعد الامريكية هل كانت ستتعرض لكل هذه الحرب?? اذن من الذي جلب وسبب كل هذه المخاطر عليها?
👍5👌1
سألني لماذا الشيعة يضربون انفسهم في عاشوراء? قلت له بيضربوا انفسهم او بيضروك? قال لا .. بيضبوا انفسهم. قلت له ماعليك منهم. هذا شي يخصهم. اهم شي انهم لايؤذونك انت. لأن اذاهم سيقتصر على انفسهم فقط. المشكلة في من يضربون الشعوب المسلمة في غ.ز.ة، ولبنان، وايران، واليمن. بالصواريخ والقنابل المحرمة دوليا..
👍9❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @alnimi2020. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة عبدالله محمد النعمي” (@alnimi2020), 324 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alnimi2020.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.