Channel
@alnaasibiu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
47subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002067975797 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alnaasibiu |
| Description | الزنديق الضال الناصبي طه الدليمي الطعان بال بيت النبي ﷺ وباحاديث الصحيحين |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alnaasibiu |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 47 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 47 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 13 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
14 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 50.0% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 35.7% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 7.14% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 7.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 13 September 2024 to 23 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
وَأَخْبَرَنِي مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ الْحُسَيْنِ، أَنَّ الْفَضْلَ بْنَ زِيَادٍ حَدَّثَهُمْ قَالَ: سَمِعْتُ أَبَا عَبْدِ اللَّهِ يُحَدِّثُ، عَنْ عَبْدِ الرَّزَّاقِ، عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ رَاشِدٍ، عَنْ عَوْفٍ، قَالَ: كُنْتُ عِنْدَ الْحَسَنِ، فَكَانَ ثَمَّ رَجُلٌ انْتَقَصَ أَبَا مُوسَى بِاتِّبَاعِهِ عَلِيًّا، فَغَضِبَ الْحَسَنُ ثُمَّ قَالَ: «سُبْحَانَ اللَّهِ، قُتِلَ أَمِيرُ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ عُثْمَانُ، فَاجْتَمَعَ النَّاسُ عَلَى خَ…
👍2
وَأَخْبَرَنِي مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ عَلِيٍّ، قَالَ: ثَنَا صَالِحٌ أَنَّهُ قَالَ لِأَبِيهِ فِي هَذِهِ الْمَسْأَلَةِ: فَإِنْ قَالَ قَائِلٌ: فَيَنْبَغِي لِمَنْ ثَبَّتَ الْخِلَافَةَ عَلَى عَلِيٍّ أَنْ يُرَبِّعَ بِهِ؟ قَالَ: «إِنَّمَا نَتَّبِعُ مَا جَاءَ، وَمَا قَوْلُنَا نَحْنُ؟ وَعَلِيٌّ عِنْدِي خَلِيفَةٌ، قَدْ سَمَّى نَفْسَهُ أَمِيرَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ، وَسَمَّاهُ أَصْحَابُ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ ﷺ أَمِيرَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ، وَأَهْلُ بَدْرٍ…
وَسَأَلْتُ أَبَا عَبْدِ اللَّهِ قُلْتُ: أَثْبَتُ شَيْءٍ يُرْوَى عَنِ النَّبِيِّ ﷺ فِي خِلَافَةِ عَلِيٍّ؟ قَالَ: مَنْ لَمْ يُثْبِتْ خِلَافَةَ عَلِيٍّ فَيَزْعُمُ أَنَّ أَصْحَابَ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ ﷺ كَانُوا فِي رَهَجٍ وَفِتْنَةٍ وَأَبْطَلَ أَحْكَامَهُمْ؟ قَالَ: فَيُرْوَى عَنِ النَّبِيِّ ﷺ حَدِيثُ سَفِينَةَ، وَحَدِيثُ ابْنِ مَسْعُودٍ. حَدِيثُ الْعَوَّامِ بْنِ حَوْشَبٍ عَنِ الشَّيْبَانِيِّ، عَنِ الْقَاسِمِ بْنِ عَبْدِ الرَّ…
رضي الله تعالى عنهم اجمعين
انظروا لهؤلاء النواصب الجدد الزنادقة فروخ الخبيث طه الدليمي الزنديق مخانيث النكرانية والاباضية يطعنون بالاحاديث التي تخالف اهوائهم ويتطاولون على امير المؤمنين علي رضي الله عنه وبالمقابل رافضي زنديق مثلهم سب ام المؤمنين عائشة رضي الله عنها والصحابيان امراء المؤمنين عثمان ومعاوية رضي الله عنهما الرافضي والناصبي ملة كفر واحدة لا فرق https://t.me/alnaasibiu #النواصب_الجدد_مخانيث_الاباضية
👍1
[ عقيدة أهل السنة في الصحابة ] 🔖 قال الإمام ابن بطة العكبري (387 هـ) فيما كتبه من إجماع الأئمة في أمور الاعتقاد: - ثم الإيمان والمعرفة بأن خير الخلق وأفضلهم وأعظمهم منزلة عند الله عز وجل بعد النبيين والمرسلين وأحقهم بخلافة رسول الله ﷺ: أبو بكر الصديق؛ عبد الله بن عثمان؛ وهو عتيق بن أبي قحافة رضي الله عنه. وتعلم أنه يوم مات رسول الله ﷺ لم يكن على وجه الأرض أحد بالوصف الذي قدمنا ذكره غيره رحمة الله عليه. ثم من بعده…
❤2👍2
احد اتباع الخبيث طه الدليمي يتهم امير المؤمنين علي رضي الله عنه بالكفر #النواصب_الجدد_مخانيث_الاباضية
😱1
رضي الله تعالى عن ال بيت النبي ﷺ
❤2
نموذج اخر لاحد الزنادقة النواصب اتباع الخبيث الزنديق الناصبي طه الدليمي #النواصب_الجدد_مخانيث_الاباضية
هذا نتاج فكر الزنديق طه الدليمي الناصبي واتباعه الذين يسلكون مسلك النكرانية
#ناصبي_زنديق
النواصب الجدد الزنادقة وتحريف احاديث النبي ﷺ https://t.me/alnaasibiu
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @alnaasibiu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,384,766 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الناصبي الزنديق طه الدليمي” (@alnaasibiu), 47 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alnaasibiu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.