Channel
@almufadall
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,980subscribers
+616 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002108265950 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @almufadall |
| Description | الأَثِير.. أي: المفضَّل على غيره. |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/almufadall |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @almufadall/15307 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 04:34 UTC | @adeooshamaa9/118745 Aug 2026, 05:48 UTC | 1.00 | 74 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @adeooshamaa9 | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 1.9 hours | this entry (4–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 489 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @adeooshamaa9. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 15:47 | 12,980 | +6 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 17:55 | 12,974 | -4 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 10:57 | 12,978 | +5 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 12:54 | 12,973 | +4 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 13:20 | 12,969 | +4 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 14:49 | 12,965 | -2 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 15:16 | 12,967 | +1 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 17:04 | 12,966 | +3 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 19:09 | 12,963 | +7 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 18:38 | 12,956 | +7 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 18:27 | 12,949 | -7 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 18:17 | 12,956 | -5 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 18:37 | 12,961 | -3 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 15:16 | 12,964 | -4 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:40 | 12,968 | +2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 14:05 | 12,966 | -1 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 12:36 | 12,967 | -2 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 08:17 | 12,969 | -7 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 05:26 | 12,976 | +2 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 05:27 | 12,974 | first reading |
629 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 629 (5 August 2026 – 13 November 2026) |
| Views total | 95,076 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Nov 2026, 20:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 34 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 197 posts held from the last 30 days (2.03%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
« فمن كان مشغولاً بالله وبذكره ومحبته فى حال حياته = وجد ذلك أحوج ما هو إليه عند خروج روحه إلى الله، ومن كان مشغولاً بغيره في حال حياته وصحته = فيعسر عليه اشتغاله بالله وحضوره معه عند الموت ما لم تدركه عناية من ربِّه، ولأجل هذا كان جديرًا بالعاقل أن يلزم قلبه ولسانه ذكر الله حيثما كان؛ لأَجل تلك اللحظة التى إن فاتت شقى شقاوة الأبد، فنسأَل الله أن يعيننا على ذكره وشكره وحسن عبادته. » • ابن القيِّم | طريق الهجرتين (٦٧…
- كيف لا تُهلكنا النّوازل (الابتلاءات عامّة) بهذه المحاور الثّلاث : ١) الاستسلام. ٢) التصالح. ٣) فهم الرسائل بحسن الظّن بالله عزّوجل. — الاستسلام = أنتَ عبد ، يفعل بكَ الله ما يشاء سبحانه، لحكمة يعملها هو سبحانه. التصالح = هذه دنيا دار كدر ودار نَصَب والقواطع والنوازل والمفاجآت دأبها، والتمتع والتّلذذ والاشتهاء والتّمني والراحة كل هذا بالجنة. فهم الرسائل بحسن الظّن بالله عزّوجل = إنّا كل شيء خلقناه بقدر. ماضٍ …
بين ضجيج البيت ومسؤوليات اليوم.. أين وقتكِ أنتِ؟🫠 تمضين يومكِ في رعاية الجميع، تسعين لراحة هذا وذاك، وتنسين أن لقلبكِ عليكِ حقاً.🤦🏻♀️ القرآن ليس مهمة جديدة تُثقل جدولك، بل هو المساحة الخضراء التي تتنفسين فيها بعد تعب النهار.🤍🫂 اجعلي لكِ ورداً وحفظاً يكون هو استراحتكِ، لا عبئاً عليكِ. في أكاديمية روضة القرآن، خصصنا لكِ حلقات هادئة تناسب يومكِ وتمنح روحكِ السكينة التي تستحقها.✨🕊 #استراحة_قلب_في_رحاب_القرآن 📌 ل…
Signed ،
آمنت بالله. لا إله إلّا الله.
- اللهمَّ لا تجعل أُنسنا إلا بك، ولا توحشنا إلا بالبُعد عنك، وأسألُكَ لذَّةَ النظرِ إلى وجهِكَ ، والشوْقَ إلى لقائِكَ، اللهمَّ اجعل قلوبنا خزائن توحيدك وألسنتنا مفاتيحَ تمجيدك وجوارحنا خدمَ طاعتِك… اللهمَّ اسلُل سخيمةَ قلبي، اللهمَّ إنّي اسالك قلباً سليماً ولساناً صادقاً، اللهمَّ أعنّي ولا تُعن عليّ وانصرني ولا تنصُر عليّ، اللهمَّ أحسِن عاقبتنا في الامور كلها وأجرنا من خزيِّ الدُّنيا وعذاب الاخرة، اللهمَّ زينّا بزي…
- اللَّهُمَّ إنِّي أَعُوذُ بعِزَّتِكَ -لا إلَهَ إلَّا أَنْتَ- أَنْ تُضِلَّنِي، أَنْتَ الحَيُّ الَّذي لا يَمُوتُ. اللَّهُمَّ رَحمَتك أَرجُو، فَلا تَكِلنِي إِلَىٰ نَفسِي طَرفَة عَينٍ، وَأَصلِح لِي شَأنِي كُلَّه، لَا إلَه إِلَّا أَنت. ربَّ اصْرِفْ عَنِّي السُّوءَ والفَحْشاءَ واجْعَلْني من عِبادِك المُخْلَصِين اللهُمَّ ألهمني رُشدي وقِني شرَّ نفسي اللهمَّ اهدني وسددني،اللهمَّ إنّي أسألكُ الهُدى والسّداد اللَّهُمَّ آ…
- قال ابنُ القَيِّم رحمه الله: "وَمنْ أنْفَعِ الأَدْويَة: الإِلحَاح فِي الدّعَاء". وقالَ ابنُ الجوزيُّ -رحمهُ الله-: "فإذا جاءَ إبليسُ فقالَ: كم تدْعُوهُ ولا ترَىٰ إجَابة!؟ فقل: أنَا أتعبَّدُ بالدُّعاء". صَيدُ الخاطرِ ص٢٢٢. وقَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّه -ﷺ- : «لا يَرُدُّ القدرَ إلَّا الدُّعاءُ ، ولا يزيدُ في العمرِ إلَّا البِرُّ». حديث حسن - ساعـة استجابـة سارعوا ولا تغفلوا
[ساعةُ الجمعةِ] هي الغنيمة الباردة التي يُحرم منها الغافل ، فمن عرف قدر المُعطي، لم يفرط في وقت العطاء، وجعل من عصر الجمعة مِحرابًا يغسل فيه همومه ويجدد فيه ميثاق اليقين. اللهم اجعلنا من الذين يقتنصون ساعات فضلك، واغفر لنا ما مضى، ووفقنا لما تحب وترضى . ساعة استجابة، والوقت المُتبّقي يكفي للصلاة على النّبي أكثر من ١٠٠٠ مرة باستشعار بإذن الله ، ومع ساعة الاستجابة تتنزّل الرّحمات ، والصلاة على النّبي أفضل من جميع…
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
قال ابن تيمية رحمه الله: فإذا جعل مكان دعائه الصلاة على النبي كفاه الله ما أهمه من أمر دنياه وآخرته، فإنه كلما صلى عليه مرة = صلى الله عليه عشرا، وهو لو دعا لآحاد المؤمنين لقالت الملائكة آمين، ولك بمثله، فدعاؤه للنبي أولى بذلك. والفتاوى لابن تيمية (١٩٣/١) - اللهُمَّ صَلِّ وَسَلِّمْ وَزِدْ وَبَارِكْ عَلَى نَبِيِّنَا مُحَمَّد. - اللهُمَّ صَلِّ وَسَلِّمْ وَزِدْ وَبَارِكْ عَلَى نَبِيِّنَا مُحَمَّد. - اللهُمَّ صَلِّ وَسَ…
Showing the 12 most recent of 629 posts we hold for @almufadall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@almufadall edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 6 posts on @almufadall as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
——— تُطفئ الخطيئة كما يُطفئ الماء النار :
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 629 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الأَثِير” (@almufadall), 12,980 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/almufadall.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.