Channel
@almotakallem
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,072subscribers
+109 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001349985753 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @almotakallem |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/almotakallem |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Sept 2026, 21:41 | 3,072 | +14 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 15:57 | 3,058 | +10 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 3,048 | +12 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 3,036 | +24 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:22 | 3,012 | no change |
| 4 Sept 2026, 01:17 | 3,012 | +3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:18 | 3,009 | +9 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 3,000 | +8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 2,992 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 2,991 | +3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 2,988 | +3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:54 | 2,985 | +14 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:24 | 2,971 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:22 | 2,970 | +7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 2,963 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 1 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (1 September 2026 – 5 September 2026) |
| Views total | 4,175 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Sept 2026, 07:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
الطريثيثي المعتزلي: الخلفاء الراشدون والصحابة العشرة محكوم عليهم بأنهم من أهل الجنة. ويذكر أنه يتبرأ مما يفعل الروافض من تنقيص الخلفاء الراشدين وخاصة أبي بكر. متشابه القرآن للطريثيثي. #الصحابة #المعتزلة
عدالة #الصحابة ونفي فسقهم عند كبار متكلمي #السادة_المعتزلة مثل هشام الفوطي وغيره في كتاب الانتصار للخياط. #الصحابة #المعتزلة
القاضي عبد الجبار (مفهوم كلامه): ذنب #الصحابة عند #الرافضة هو ذنب الأنبياء عند الملاحدة. وهو جعل الناس المسلمين. تثبيت دلائل النبوة.
من افتخارات الجاحظ هي: الكلام على #الرافضة. الطبقات للقاضي. #المعتزلة
الشاهد على أن المالكية من أهل الرأي وليسوا من أهل الحديث. يظن الكثير بأن المالكية من أهل الحديث، وهم ليسوا كذلك. بل هم من أهل الرأي في الفقه لأخذهم بالقياس مقابل الحديث كالحنفية. والجشمي هنا يختار مذهب أهل الحديث، أي: الشافعية، تأثرا منه بالقاضي عبد الجبار الشافعي، الأشعري سابقا والمعتزلي لاحقا.
عدالة #الصحابة وإجماعهم والاعتماد على خبر الواحد عند الحاكم الجشمي. #الملاحظة: هذا الاستدلال لحجية الخبر الواحد عند الجشمي هو استدلال أبي عبد الله الشافعي في كتبه. #المعتزلة
الشافعي يذكر في بعض مصادر #المعتزلة بأبي عبد الله.
أدل الدليل على بطلان #الإمامة عند الحاكم الجشمي. عيون المسائل، ٨٣. #المعتزلة
مؤقت: مما لفت انتباهي في كتب المقالات هو أن جميعهم متفقون على أن الرافضة لا يرون الخروج (أي: القيام والثورة ضد الحكام) إلا بعد ظهور الإمام الغائب. بل وهذا قد كرر المفيد والشريف المرتضى، والطوسي في كتبهم عدة مرات. بل الطوسي يطمئن الحكام بأن لا يخافوا من الشيعة على حكمهم!! لأنهم لا يعتقدون بتأسيس الحكومة والقيام ضد الحكام قبل آخر الزمان عند ظهور الإمام الغائب!! ثم قارن هذا ما يدعيه بعض الشيعة اليوم من تحريف تراثهم بأ…
الجبر عند #الروافض. الناشئ الأكبر، مسائل الإمامة ومقتطفات من الكتاب الأوسط، ٩٢_٩٣.
عدالة #الصحابة عند الجاحظ. مقالات البلخي، ٥٠٠. #المعتزلة
#التشبيه و #الجبر عند #الرافضة في مقالات الكعبي البلخي.
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @almotakallem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“المتكلّم (الدراسات الكلامية المبكرة ثم الأمور العامة)” (@almotakallem), 3,072 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/almotakallem.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.