2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 728–729 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Aug 2026, 06:43
729
+1
8 Aug 2026, 07:15
728
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 3 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
23m 28s
Average length
1m 34s
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
830 reactions across 19 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
228
27.5%
❤
205
24.7%
🔥
174
21.0%
💘
65
7.83%
⚡
48
5.78%
👍
21
2.53%
😈
14
1.69%
🏆
12
1.45%
🍾
10
1.20%
👀
9
1.08%
👏
9
1.08%
🍓
7
0.843%
🥰
7
0.843%
🤯
6
0.723%
👻
3
0.361%
💅
3
0.361%
🙊
3
0.361%
🐳
2
0.241%
👌
2
0.241%
💯
2
0.241%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 830reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 January 2026 to 9 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
79
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 19 we hold a reading for · 74%
Most on one post
16
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @allshuffle. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 January 2026 to 9 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ALL SHUFFLE 2026🚀
Отличные новости для всех, кто из года в год создает атмосферу и огонь на нашем событии👇
По традиции, в этом ноябре мы проведем новую, юбилейную главу нашего фестиваля🏆
Вас ждет много нововведений, интересных форматов и привозов, которые раньше мы не делали, от вас остается не ронять планку и создавать такой же пожар как и раньше!❤️🔥
Совсем скоро мы начнем делиться информацией о грядущем событи…
AFTERMOVIE 🎬
ALL SHUFFLE 2025
Спасибо каждому, кто стал частью этих незабываемых дней❤️🔥
Если увидели себя или своих друзей - делитесь этим видео, отмечайте нас и оставляйте свои впечатления в комментариях 👇
Увидимся в ноябре 2026😉
Inst: @allshuffle
ВК: vk.com/allshuffle
Танцу любые возрасту покорны 🔥 Мы приглашаем вас посетить крутое мероприятие ❤️🔥
Чемпионат NEO SHUFFLE KAZAN 2026 🔥 WHITE PARTY EDITION SUMMER ☀️
Как вы поняли из названия это будет Белая вечеринка в формате Баттлов с невероятно вайбовой атмосферой 😎
Мы наконец можем объявить об открытии регистрации на Турнир
https://forms.gle/nQnDeq8sikhBt4m86
Он состоится 21 Июня в 10:00 Утра ❗️Локация : г. Казань Парк Имени…
AWESOME KIDS😍
KIDS PRO TOP 32
@katushka vs @amira
ALL SHUFFLE 2025
Еще один интересный баттл, где в самом начале сетки сошлись две яркие участницы, одна с прекрасной техникой из Питера, другая с бешеной харизмой из Казани🤩
Inst: @allshuffle
ВК: vk.com/allshuffle
BATTLE MODE ⚔️
ADULTS PRO TOP 16
@nikshapes vs @rusito
ALL SHUFFLE 2025
Один из интереснейших и напряженных баттлов, концептуальный шейпер из Санкт-Петербурга, против вайбового танцора из Барселоны😤
Интересно, о чем они говорят?😄
Inst: @allshuffle
ВК: vk.com/allshuffle
ADULTS PRO for THIRD🥉
@joker vs @anderson_jovani
ALL SHUFFLE 2025
Напряженная битва между двумя финалистами, с одной стороны мощная танцовщица из Москвы, с другой - судья ALL SHUFFLE 2024 из Барселоны, но только один займёт 3 место😱🔥
Inst: @allshuffle
ВК: vk.com/allshuffle
TEENS for THIRD🥉
@feel vs @starkiller
ALL SHUFFLE 2025
Ученики двух разных школ по шаффлу в Москве, чей подход и стиль победит в этом баттле? Давайте посмотрим😎
Inst: @allshuffle
ВК: vk.com/allshuffle
Смотрим итоги👇
Прежде чем вы узнаете о своем призе, мы хотим сказать вам спасибо за вашу активность, и то как вы старались ее проявлять🙏❤️🔥
Мы верим в то, что вне зависимости от результатов, вы и дальше сможете поддерживать наш проект, так мы будем понимать в правильном ли направлении мы двигаемся🫰
Победители и бонус для всех участников в комментариях👇
Вы же помните, что сегодня последний день?😉
Во-первых, надеемся он будет не последним, потому что мы продолжим делиться самыми яркими событиями нашего события🥹❤️
Во-вторых, какой для вас был самый запоминающийся баттл или событие на ALL SHUFFLE 2025?🫠
Пишем ответ в комментариях👇
KIDS PRO for THIRD🥉
@firefox vs @madinati
ALL SHUFFLE 2025
Последние силы, чтобы побороться за попадание в тройку лучших, две разные школы и подход, Москва против Казани, кто проявит себя лучше?😱
Inst: @allshuffle
ВК: vk.com/allshuffle
❤🔥21👏9❤8🐳2👍2💘1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @allshuffle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 267,440 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@allshuffle named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@katushka named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ALL SHUFFLE” (@allshuffle), 729 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/allshuffle.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.