Channel
@allminings
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
280subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002110924544 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @allminings |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/allminings |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:38 | 280 | +2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 278 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:33 | 279 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 279 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (13 May 2026 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 53 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
New Update just like Notcoin Called $67 🔥 _67 price 0.008$ 🤝 Notcoin gave me $500 some people made thousands $$ so lets see how much $67 will give us after 16 days_ @all Start now 👇🏻 https://telegram.me/sixsevenclub_bot/app?startapp=ref_774025c6
My honest take on Six 6️⃣ Seven 7️⃣ Club. This is a telegram mini app with almost same mechanics as the *Notcoin*, launched with no white paper and it’s probably nothing too. Their token generation event has already taken place and the token is seating at a good market cap of $19m. The app is simple and straightforward, all you need to do is complete given quest in app and also role a dice 🎲 to get six and punch t…
😱🔥Do this now and get 1000 ITLG☝️ 👉Tap Ur profile ✅ 👉Tap on Referral ✅ 👉Tap on Human Hash✅ 👉Copy the Code: 0595329504 👉Submit the code and u will get 1k ITLG ✅💯 For new users, here is the link below👇 Link: https://interlinklabs.ai/0595329504
🚨The Live Consensus Price of $ITL is now available on ATV! Track the latest consensus value of $ITL directly on ATV and stay updated with real-time market sentiment. One ecosystem. One live price. More transparency. 1 $ITL is sold for 😱$3.5 on ATV New users can register immediately 👇🏻 https://interlinklabs.ai/0595329504 Make sure you're mining interlink very actively until you get there 😂
*Summary 📖* 🔰Why are IEOs so popular right now? ✅Relatively clear regulations: Exchanges usually have compliance measures in place, making them safer than ICOs. ✅Market focus: New projects are concentrated on exchange platforms, making them easier to attract attention. ✅Investor psychology: Investors hope to seize early opportunities to earn quick returns while minimizing the risk of being scammed. 📖Example: NGE…
4️⃣ Convenience ✅ Investors only need an exchange account to participate. ✅ No need for complex operations such as managing wallets, signing, and calling smart contracts. ✅ Low barrier to entry for beginners and ordinary investors.
2️⃣ Fast Listing and Trading ✅ After subscription, the tokens will be directly listed and traded on exchanges. ✅ No need to find liquidity pools yourself; trading is immediate.
1️⃣High security ✅Projects must be vetted by the exchange, including verification of technology, team, white paper, and compliance. ✅The exchange provides partial credit endorsement, reducing the probability of investors being scammed.
📖Reasons Why IEOs Attract Investors 1️⃣ High Security 2️⃣ Fast Trading Launch 3️⃣ Potentially High Returns 4️⃣ Convenience 5️⃣ Guaranteed Liquidity
@79900 HIT TP1✅ +27%✅💸💸💸 Close 50% of orders Adjust the break-even point for the remaining orders
🪙 Cryptocurrency: BTC (USDT) 🟢 Direction: BUY 📍 Entry Range: 79650-79750 🎯 Take Profit 1: 79900 🎯 Take Profit 2: 80100 🎯 Take Profit 3: 80300 🎯 Take Profit 4: OPEN ⛔️ Stop Loss: 79300 💡 Execution is crucial—profit will naturally follow💰
HIT TP1✅ TP2✅ TP3✅ +220 pips✅💸💸💸 Close all orders and enjoy profits Signal from our team, Senior VIP group
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @allminings. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PROJECTS, TRADES & INVESTMENTS” (@allminings), 280 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/allminings.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.