и на последок. итзи лучшая группа, которая когда-либо существовала и эта компания их не заслуживает. теперь я всё сказала
🍓107❤52💯32❤🔥22💘9⚡5💋4🔥2
Signed all in itzy ≷

Channel
@allinitzyy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
597subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001294034641 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @allinitzyy |
| Created | 13 November 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/allinitzyy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:27 | 597 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 599 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 599 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 10 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,668 reactions across 14 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 439 | 26.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 288 | 17.3% | |
| 🍓 | 288 | 17.3% | |
| 💘 | 230 | 13.8% | |
| 💋 | 113 | 6.77% | |
| 💔 | 105 | 6.29% | |
| 😭 | 66 | 3.96% | |
| 🥰 | 44 | 2.64% | |
| 💯 | 32 | 1.92% | |
| ⚡ | 26 | 1.56% | |
| 🕊 | 17 | 1.02% | |
| 🦄 | 15 | 0.899% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 0.18% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.12% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,668reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 10 March 2025 to 11 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
и на последок. итзи лучшая группа, которая когда-либо существовала и эта компания их не заслуживает. теперь я всё сказала
🍓107❤52💯32❤🔥22💘9⚡5💋4🔥2
Signed all in itzy ≷
closed 🔒 всем привет. думаю, все давно заметили, что я начала часто пропадать и активность сильно спала. я уже писала, но для тех, кто не знает. на данный момент я готовлюсь к выпускным экзаменам и впереди меня ждут некоторые операции по состоянию здоровья и у меня ни физически, ни морально нет сил вести этот канал. очень жаль, что так происходит, так как я очень люблю его, он для меня очень важен и у меня очень мно…
💔105😭28⚡13❤9🍓6❤🔥3💋3💘3
Signed all in itzy ≷
🤍 йеджи для harper's bazaar korea × roger vivier
💘59❤25❤🔥18💋17🍓3🦄3🕊1
Signed all in itzy ≷
выступление уже вышло ❤️
❤45❤🔥11💘10💋7🍓6🕊1
Signed all in itzy ≷
я заплакала.
❤🔥68💋24💘20❤18🥰10🍓6🕊1
Signed all in itzy ≷
ВСЕМ МОЛЧАТЬ. йеджи на студио чум !! 🚨🚨
❤52❤🔥19😭14🍓8🥰6💘3💋2🕊2
Signed all in itzy ≷
господи как же это хорошо. это именно то звучание, которое я безумно люблю в кпоп. настолько качественный дебютный альбом.. как же я ею горжусь 😭 надеюсь на то, что этот шедевр заметят, и он получит заслуженный успех. и давайте поговорим о том как раскрылся её вокал ?? это невероятно 🩵 мой топ треков на данный момент 1. air & invasion 2. can't slow me, no 3. 258
❤71❤🔥20🍓18💘7⚡5💋1🕊1🦄1
Signed all in itzy ≷
Я НЕ МОГУ ПОКА ПОСЛУШАТЬ давайте свою оценку 😭
🍓39❤17💋11💘7❤🔥5🕊1🦄1
Signed all in itzy ≷
AIR M/V OUT NOW🤩
💘36❤17💋12🍓6❤🔥3🔥1🕊1🦄1
Signed all in itzy ≷
йеджи первая участница группы, которая дебютирует сольно, поэтому ей как никогда необходима наша поддержка. ознакомьтесь с данным постом, здесь есть вся основная информация по саппорту. если у вас есть возможность уделите этому немного времени 💕
❤51💘23🥰10🍓5💋5❤🔥4🕊1
Signed all in itzy ≷
не буду выкладывать никакие спойлеры, так как остались считанные минуты до релиза, но во время лайва девочки присоединились к йеджи 🥺
🍓53😭19💘18❤8❤🔥5💋4🥰4🦄2
Signed all in itzy ≷
🖤 йеджи о поддержке участниц во время подготовки к сольнику мемберки сказали мне: «мы рады, что ты первая начала сольную карьеру. мы знали, что это будешь ты». их поддержка по-настоящему согрела мое сердце и продолжает придавать мне сил даже сейчас». она продолжила: «я впервые готовилась к съемкам музыкального клипа в одиночку. даже когда было тяжело, я не могла ни с кем поделиться своими переживаниями, поэтому чувс…
❤🔥50💘20❤13🥰11💋6🍓5😭5🕊2
Signed all in itzy ≷
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @allinitzyy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,291,488 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“crazy in løve ❤️🔥” (@allinitzyy), 597 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/allinitzyy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.