Channel
@allbridge_announcements
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
869subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001300590971 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @allbridge_announcements |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/allbridge_announcements |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 869 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 870 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:01 | 870 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (20 April 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,484 |
| Reactions total | 24 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 23:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
55 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 21 | 38.2% | |
| ❤ | 13 | 23.6% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 12.7% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 7.27% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 5.45% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 3.64% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 3.64% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 3.64% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 1.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
You still have a month to climb the Wave 2 leaderboard. Half of Wave 2 is done, half to go, until September 1. Create content about Allbridge Next, bring referrals, claim your rewards. Join Wave 2 → next.allbridge.io/ambassadors
❤3👌1
Allbridge Core is running steady. In the first week since the relaunch, total transfer volume through Core already topped $5M. Thank you for the trust!
Allbridge Core is back up, running on CCTP and LayerZero for transfers, with no liquidity pools. The bridge is fully safe to use. Allbridge Next kept running normally throughout. Cross-chain transfers continue without interruption. Technical Post-Mortem is available on X
👍4👌1
Allbridge - Announcement Group pinned a photo
Official Statement from the Allbridge team We confirm that an attacker withdrew $1.65M from Allbridge Core's liquidity pools. The team is preparing a detailed breakdown and will publish a final report on what happened. There is no threat to users liquidity right now. Allbridge Next is operating normally. At the same time, we are already working on relaunching Core without liquidity pools. Transfers will go through …
🔥4👌1👍1
Allbridge Core is experiencing a security incident. We have paused the protocol as a precaution while we investigate. If you have liquidity in affected pools, please withdraw now. The resulting pool imbalance created a temporary positive arbitrage window. If you took advantage of it, please consider returning funds to the address below - this will go directly toward compensating affected LPs. 0x01a494079DCB715f62…
🔥6👀2👌1
TON is now live on Allbridge Next. One more major network has joined the cross-chain flow. Ton is a decentralized L1blockchain developed by @telegram and the open-source community You can now move USDT and GRAM (TON's native token) between TON and other Allbridge Next networks in one bridge, with no extra steps. Try it now → https://bit.ly/4w6AR9B
❤2
The first month of summer is behind us. Allbridge Core keeps showing strong numbers. This month also brings the first numbers from Allbridge Next. Here is a look at what happened at Allbridge.
🔥3❤🔥2❤1
Allbridge Next Ambassador Wave 1 rewards are paid. Thanks to everyone who joined, created content, and drove referral volume. Reviews are done, submissions checked for quality and abuse, and payouts are sent. Top 10 creators by content score split the $1,500 content pool: 🥇 @bigkala_001 🥈 @KGeNazeemali12 🥉 @rahul19_rahul 4. @Realboybr 5. @Dzola17 6. @zkzonk 7. @Bency1749379 8. @onyx71188 9. @STsweet007 10. @VOnyech…
❤3🔥1
Allbridge Next Ambassador Wave 1 is complete. In just one month, 578 ambassadors joined the program, created 2995 posts, shared Allbridge Next with their communities, and helped bring 1,102 transfers totaling $594,657 through referral links That is exactly what this program was created for: real people explaining real cross-chain use cases, testing the product, bringing new users, and helping Allbridge Next grow. …
❤4
Allbridge Next crossed $3M in volume. A meaningful first milestone for us. Stablecoins and native gas tokens across 8 chains, predictable fees, typically 0.1%, and fast settlement. That's what you keep choosing. Thank you for bridging with us. Keep going, no limits. → next.allbridge.io
🔥4
One week left. Cycle closes July 1. Create content on X, drive referral volume, or both. $3,000 prize pool. The leaderboard shifts every day. Secure your spot. Team members on the leaderboard are not eligible. 👉 next.allbridge.io/ambassadors
👍2🤣2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @allbridge_announcements. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 493,848 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@allbridge_announcements named 8 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Allbridge - Announcement Group” (@allbridge_announcements), 869 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/allbridge_announcements.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.