Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for dydonia

Channel

dydonia

@allalaghhioo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

146subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001836983978
TypeChannel
Username@allalaghhioo
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/allalaghhioo

Growth

1441461459 August 2026 — 144 subscribers10 August 2026 — 144 subscribers17 August 2026 — 146 subscribers9 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 144–146 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 21:47146+2
10 Aug 2026, 05:01144no change
9 Aug 2026, 07:00144first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
49s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

160 reactions across 5 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥5433.8%
4930.6%
👀127.50%
🍓106.25%
🔥106.25%
💋85.00%
custom 528067057542393687942.50%
custom 536621983855963077342.50%
custom 525133320430815155431.88%
custom 529185613914153152521.25%
custom 530075843811503455921.25%
custom 527201546470321190710.625%
🥰10.625%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 160reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 12 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Jul 2026, 17:38 UTC319 views56 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

как подписать

❤‍🔥2013💋7custom 52806705754239368794custom 52513332043081515543🔥2custom 52918561391415315252custom 53662198385596307732

6 Jul 2026, 09:06 UTC290 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026

привет хотите

❤‍🔥8👀31custom 52720154647032119071custom 53007584381150345591custom 53662198385596307731

6 Jul 2026, 08:14 UTC259 views41 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ээ артур микаэлян

18❤‍🔥10🍓9👀2🔥1custom 53662198385596307731

5 Jul 2026, 11:07 UTC169 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @kozabemePhoto

ПІВЕНЬ SQUAD - SKIN этот номер пипец как много для меня значит, я ехала на фест чисто ради того чтобы кайфово выступить и ощутить себя в этом образе. это первый именно мой проект, и я рада, что мои друзяшечки меня постоянно поддерживали, даже те кто не участвовал, спасибо вам большое❤️ вообще меня много чего мотивировало ставить эту хорягу, начиная песней, заканчивая великой лизой хейли, так что мне очень приятненьк

11👀5❤‍🔥2

4 Jul 2026, 16:14 UTC173 views30 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

единственное чем могу за сегодня похвастаться

❤‍🔥14🔥76👀1💋1🥰1

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @allalaghhioo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 946,418 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“dydonia” (@allalaghhioo), 146 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/allalaghhioo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.